In post 217, waynegg wrote:Jason. If you can get all those words out, you can build cases in those words. All you've done is point fingers and shield Sakura to this point. You can be town for now, but try working evidence in instead of just derp, scum this guy. You're wrong about me and I think you're wrong about Sakura too. I'll commute my judgement on you and put you on probation to give you the opportunity to improve your posting.
You think i'm not DUDE?
Your scum, you know IT.
You can't even defend IT.
You argued semantics like SCUM.
Instead of having the TIME.
To just ask better QUESTIONS.
So don't point fingers HERE.
When you did the SAME.
And tunneled Sakura on NOTHING.
Other then shitty Semantics FOOL.
In post 228, Klick wrote: In post 177, waynegg wrote:So, how about explaining that. Why were you role fishing, and then when called out for it what town motivation is there to add shit to statements that isn't there and push a mislynch? There's no town motivation to what you're doing. I've answered your questions. I could give two shits whether you're personally satisfied with the answers. You've actually made me move to the computer instead of spending quality time with my lady so I could stop being ninja'd by you before I could even respond. Fuck you for that. Now rant on with your scum ass and keep digging that grave. Make sure it fits the way you like.
VOTE: Desparado
This isn't scumposting. The objective of this post is not to get people to follow him onto a mislynch, or to gather town points, but to vote scum.
Do you have anything to support him being scum?
That may be the CASE.
But that can come FROM.
Just as many scum BUMS.
Cause he was redirecting SUSPICION.
From the Sakura and WAYNEGG.
Arguments, so scum would DO.
Just what you said DUDE.
In post 253, Sakura Hana wrote:Town: Jason, Zoid, Desperado, Peregrine
Scum: waynegg, Klick, Belisarious
Null: The rest
Not sure what i THINK.
About this list, looks FAKE.
But could be from TOWN.
Quite easily in my MIND.
In post 288, Belisarius wrote: In post 279, Skullduggery wrote:Belisarius has not pushed a case of any sort yet. I don't understand why he's being lumped in with the other two.
Because I supported wayne, and never said outright that my initial vote was for high word count:content ratio. She could be forgiven for thinking that I was sheeping wayne, and since I voted first I could only sheep wayne if I knew in advance what he'd do, like scum that planned this shit ahead on N0. Somehow.
No, lumping me in with wayne was not scummy. Her reaction to the wagon, however,
was
. I also don't like how her first vote on wayne, although supposedly in agreement with SD's logic, was written to look like she was sheeping Jason and then the story later changes to be supporting SD. If you look at the whole post in context:
In post 28, Sakura Hana wrote:Looks like he also has to rhyme or sound like a song or something in addition to capitalizing the last word, also I agree with that vote
[post=waynegg]waynegg[/post]
Why do I feel like i'm the only Normal person here?
So "Looks like he also has to rhyme or sound like a song ...." is clearly talking about Jason, and the clause "also I agree with
that vote
" (emphasis mine) is
in the same sentence
as her comment on Jason's post restriction, posted immediately after Jason's vote, and makes no reference to SD. She doesn't say she agrees with any reasoning, she says she agrees with
that vote
. Devoid of any other context, one would expect to believe "that vote" would refer to the vote immediately beforehand (Jason's), and in context it's part of a sentence that is talking about Jason. Both tell us she's talking about Jason's vote.
People say what they mean, even when they don't mean to. SH was piling onto Jason's vote, not SD's, or she would have said "I agree with SD's reasoning," most likely in a separate sentence from talking about Jason.
There. Now I've made a case.
Beli, this is semantics FOOL.
So quit arguing it NOW.
She replaced out so INSTEAD.
Of this shit you CALLED.
A fucking case, it AIN'T
Why not actually Scum HUNT.
She clearly refered to THAT.
In the way the VOTE.
Was as a whole DUDE.
Even if refering to MINE.
Mine was a wagon VOTE.
So what's the difference DUDE?
That you can see FOOL?
In post 297, Karnage wrote: In post 202, JasonWazza wrote: In post 154, Karnage wrote:VOTE: Sakura Hana
I wouldn't have wasted my time reading through that shit if she would have just clarified her "reason" instead of arguing semantics. Plus I find sheeping scummy.
Sakura, at the time of your vote did you think waynegg was scum? if so, why?
Dude what you been SMOKING?
And can i get SOME?
Read it again you FOOL.
And realize Sakura wasn't ARGUING.
Them semantics of yours TOOL.
Her reasoning was clearly THERE.
And he semantic-ed it UP.
Maybe it wasn't arguing semantics but in my read it seemed obvious the waynegg was looking for an explanation of sakuras vote and the whole thing could have been dealt with rather quickly instead of it getting dragged out.
So why was it THAT.
It's Sakura's job to CLARIFY.
Shitty questions and not WAYNEGG'S?
Waynegg argued Semantics with HER.
And used it to PAINT.
A Scummy Picture that's FAKE.
It may have been DRAGGED.
Out but that wasn't SAKURA.
That was scum butt WAYNEGG.
In post 302, Saki wrote:could that be wayne's pr?
he has to post like he's high
This i lol'd at HARD.
So Baby Spice is TOWN.
It quite easily shows HERE.
And this is just ONE.
More fucking person that HAS.
Seen the shit Waynegg PULLED.
Clearly it ain't a COINCIDENCE.
That so many people SPOTTED.
This fuckers scuminess so EASILY.
