The Walking Dead Mafia! ( Game Over )


Forum rules
User avatar
Jon Doe
Jon Doe
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Jon Doe
Goon
Goon
Posts: 161
Joined: July 29, 2013

Post Post #1225 (ISO) » Sun Aug 04, 2013 5:55 am

Post by Jon Doe »

Can we knock it off and get back to scum hunting?

Wayne, make a decision, either you're in or you're out or let the mod make it for you.

~Titus
User avatar
Jon Doe
Jon Doe
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Jon Doe
Goon
Goon
Posts: 161
Joined: July 29, 2013

Post Post #1226 (ISO) » Sun Aug 04, 2013 5:55 am

Post by Jon Doe »

With an unstoppable hoard and 2-5 deaths a night, I don't think multiball is an option here. SK or x-shot vig, maybe. Having two scum factions, a random 1-3 kills from a mechanic, and a SK/vig would be up to 7 dead per day. Doing the math, that doesn't add up.
User avatar
Sugar Cain
Sugar Cain
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Sugar Cain
Goon
Goon
Posts: 814
Joined: May 4, 2013

Post Post #1227 (ISO) » Sun Aug 04, 2013 6:00 am

Post by Sugar Cain »

In post 1225, Jon Doe wrote:Can we knock it off and get back to scum hunting?
What a pro town thing to say. :igmeou:

I think I made a joke (albiet a bad one) to lighten the mood.
User avatar
waynegg
waynegg
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
waynegg
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4445
Joined: May 30, 2013
Location: Somewhere in the vapours surrounding the Moon

Post Post #1228 (ISO) » Sun Aug 04, 2013 6:09 am

Post by waynegg »

I thought it was funny Nero...
Wayne's reading...odd, but I think he's trying, he's just decided the quickest way to the market down the street was to create a causality portal and tesseract between the two spaces rather than walking. down. the street. ~ Ghostlin
Like LEGO minifigs?
User avatar
Desperado
Desperado
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Desperado
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 12582
Joined: February 18, 2013
Location: Raleigh, NC

Post Post #1229 (ISO) » Sun Aug 04, 2013 6:15 am

Post by Desperado »

Do I need to requote my Pitoli case or something? It's really good and deserves more votes.
User avatar
Jon Doe
Jon Doe
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Jon Doe
Goon
Goon
Posts: 161
Joined: July 29, 2013

Post Post #1230 (ISO) » Sun Aug 04, 2013 6:15 am

Post by Jon Doe »

In post 1228, waynegg wrote:I thought it was funny Nero...
User avatar
Sugar Cain
Sugar Cain
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Sugar Cain
Goon
Goon
Posts: 814
Joined: May 4, 2013

Post Post #1231 (ISO) » Sun Aug 04, 2013 6:25 am

Post by Sugar Cain »

In post 1226, Jon Doe wrote:With an unstoppable hoard and 2-5 deaths a night, I don't think multiball is an option here. SK or x-shot vig, maybe. Having two scum factions, a random 1-3 kills from a mechanic, and a SK/vig would be up to 7 dead per day. Doing the math, that doesn't add up.
I kinda agree. Though I was pretty sure that the zombie's only killed 1-2 per night and any potential vig/sk could be even/odd night. When I say the kill I admittedly thought an SK 'cause "smothered" sounds up close, personal and sinister but Mara reminded me that flavor means crap. Though its still a theme game and I assume that roles fit with the show somekind of way.

Mainly I just think it was off that Amrun thought Thor was scummy and that his attack on us was scummy but was still considering us as a viable lynch option unless she thought there was scum beyond the hypothetical Thor team.
User avatar
Jon Doe
Jon Doe
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Jon Doe
Goon
Goon
Posts: 161
Joined: July 29, 2013

Post Post #1232 (ISO) » Sun Aug 04, 2013 6:42 am

Post by Jon Doe »

Yep. It's 0-2. Senior moment.
User avatar
Jon Doe
Jon Doe
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Jon Doe
Goon
Goon
Posts: 161
Joined: July 29, 2013

Post Post #1233 (ISO) » Sun Aug 04, 2013 6:43 am

Post by Jon Doe »

Speaking of Thor...still waiting on that answer
User avatar
Amrun
Amrun
Killed the Radio Star
User avatar
User avatar
Amrun
Killed the Radio Star
Killed the Radio Star
Posts: 22501
Joined: January 24, 2011
Location: East Coast US

Post Post #1234 (ISO) » Sun Aug 04, 2013 7:13 am

Post by Amrun »

In post 1222, Sugar Cain wrote:
In post 1206, Amrun wrote:
In post 1194, Sugar Cain wrote:
In post 1116, Amrun wrote:Thor being shady isn't a valid reason not to vote you in the current gamestate.
please explain this?
Why would it be? At a point when reads are fluid and the game is large, you vote who is scummiest, period.
Ok, so you vote for who is scummist right? That's cool, that's like any mafia game ever but you said that the current GAMESTATE made me voteable, so what about the current gamestate makes you think there's multiscum? You think that the kill on Andrea is an SK?
Never said the gamestate makes you votable. Also never implied multiscum, not that I consider an sk multiscum anyway.

I said the gamestate (early game, mutable reads) means that one bad vote on a wagon isn't a reason not to be on a wagon. Huge misrep. Stahp.
I survived
Tigerpocalypse 2011


Fusion Mafia, ongoing now.
User avatar
waynegg
waynegg
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
waynegg
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4445
Joined: May 30, 2013
Location: Somewhere in the vapours surrounding the Moon

Post Post #1235 (ISO) » Sun Aug 04, 2013 7:17 am

Post by waynegg »

In post 1222, Sugar Cain wrote:
In post 1206, Amrun wrote:
In post 1194, Sugar Cain wrote:
In post 1116, Amrun wrote:Thor being shady isn't a valid reason not to vote you in the current gamestate.
please explain this?
Why would it be? At a point when reads are fluid and the game is large, you vote who is scummiest, period.
Ok, so you vote for who is scummist right? That's cool, that's like any mafia game ever but you said that the current GAMESTATE made me voteable, so what about the current gamestate makes you think there's multiscum? You think that the kill on Andrea is an SK?
Can you GLOAT moar?
Wayne's reading...odd, but I think he's trying, he's just decided the quickest way to the market down the street was to create a causality portal and tesseract between the two spaces rather than walking. down. the street. ~ Ghostlin
Like LEGO minifigs?
User avatar
Jon Doe
Jon Doe
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Jon Doe
Goon
Goon
Posts: 161
Joined: July 29, 2013

Post Post #1236 (ISO) » Sun Aug 04, 2013 7:17 am

Post by Jon Doe »

In post 1235, waynegg wrote:
In post 1222, Sugar Cain wrote:
In post 1206, Amrun wrote:
In post 1194, Sugar Cain wrote:
In post 1116, Amrun wrote:Thor being shady isn't a valid reason not to vote you in the current gamestate.
please explain this?
Why would it be? At a point when reads are fluid and the game is large, you vote who is scummiest, period.
Ok, so you vote for who is scummist right? That's cool, that's like any mafia game ever but you said that the current GAMESTATE made me voteable, so what about the current gamestate makes you think there's multiscum? You think that the kill on Andrea is an SK?
Can you GLOAT moar?
User avatar
sangres
sangres
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
sangres
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4466
Joined: July 8, 2013
Location: Siege Perilous

Post Post #1237 (ISO) » Sun Aug 04, 2013 8:24 am

Post by sangres »

In post 1128, Amrun wrote:Why aren't I in the town bloc? I haz a sadz. :(. I am legit obvtown

P-edit: that's a stupid fucking answer and you know it

P-edit 2: okay, Matt, sounds legit
You are totally in my town bloc
In post 1134, MattP wrote:
In post 1133, Amrun wrote:Srs question about why I'm not in the bloc :'(
That's not a block, that's currently the three incredibly active town players. You haven't read a chunk of the game. I have you as a townread, but I don't have you as a person who's prone to be in counterproductive arguments

Like seriously, people are going to come into this game and call brains, myself, and sugar scum. Because it's easy. Period. And we're all loud enough and antagonistic enough for people to wagon it, as is evident throughout the duration of the game. But if all three of us swallow our egos and just metaphorically buttfuck anyone that tries to derail productive wagons, we'll be fine considering we three definitely have the most vocal power.

That's my point. Vote blocs never work when this many players. It's more that we three slots need to try to be more cohesive
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pk7yqlTMvp8
In post 1207, Desperado wrote:Why is everyone saying the like/agree with my pitoli case but not voting it
I wanted to synch first but it's not happening yet.
In post 1229, Desperado wrote:Do I need to requote my Pitoli case or something? It's really good and deserves more votes.
VOTE: Pitoli
User avatar
Desperado
Desperado
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Desperado
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 12582
Joined: February 18, 2013
Location: Raleigh, NC

Post Post #1238 (ISO) » Sun Aug 04, 2013 8:28 am

Post by Desperado »

In post 511, sangres wrote:
In post 501, No Brains Here wrote:I have been ready to discuss reads from the get mebbe you missed the whole fery fery fery fery nacho nacho nacho nacho post where are you huhhuhuhuh

I mean how much louder can I get. instead you decided to troll me/us and trust fund instead
3. Amrun
5. Desperado
6. borkjerfkin
7. Majiffy
12. No Brains Here ( DrippingGoofball / Pirate Mollie )
13. Toogeloo
17. Mattp
19. Thor665
21. Trust Fund ( Cabd / Syryana )
23. Sugar Cain ( Nero Cain / Ms Marangal )

^^town

ellibereth and AD i wanna call town but i can't yet

the guy i'm voting is scum
john doe also seems pretty scum
Majiffy/Trust already flipped town. I still feel really comfortable with everyone else on this list. Forget Doe for today, Pitoli is way scummier and we need to stop bickering and start consolidating.
User avatar
Desperado
Desperado
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
Desperado
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 12582
Joined: February 18, 2013
Location: Raleigh, NC

Post Post #1239 (ISO) » Sun Aug 04, 2013 8:28 am

Post by Desperado »

In post 511, sangres wrote:
In post 501, No Brains Here wrote:I have been ready to discuss reads from the get mebbe you missed the whole fery fery fery fery nacho nacho nacho nacho post where are you huhhuhuhuh

I mean how much louder can I get. instead you decided to troll me/us and trust fund instead
3. Amrun
5. Desperado
6. borkjerfkin
7. Majiffy
12. No Brains Here ( DrippingGoofball / Pirate Mollie )
13. Toogeloo
17. Mattp
19. Thor665
21. Trust Fund ( Cabd / Syryana )
23. Sugar Cain ( Nero Cain / Ms Marangal )

^^town

ellibereth and AD i wanna call town but i can't yet

the guy i'm voting is scum
john doe also seems pretty scum
Majiffy/Trust already flipped town. I still feel really comfortable with everyone else on this list. Forget Doe for today, Pitoli is way scummier and we need to stop bickering and start consolidating.
User avatar
No Brains Here
No Brains Here
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
No Brains Here
Goon
Goon
Posts: 662
Joined: July 29, 2013

Post Post #1240 (ISO) » Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:00 am

Post by No Brains Here »

In post 1208, Desperado wrote:
In post 1205, No Brains Here wrote:
MORE OGML votes please


focus focus focus
My pitoli case is much better than your OGML case and I'm annoyed that I asked you to comment on it and all you could muster was "I've never played with them so i dunno."
desp

desp

desp

I want you to look into my eyes and know that I am here for you. okay? you are in my don't lynch don't touch pile if anyone looks at you funny I will eat their liver.

the ogml case is mostly dgb cos I don't them either. and that was dgb posting right there.

let me elaborate on the pitouli case; I think it is decent but the thing is, is some of that could be a playstyle thing. if I had at least 1 game with them I could give you a better response. dgb is pretty adamant about ogml so I don't see our vote moving.
User avatar
Thor665
Thor665
Papa Smurf
User avatar
User avatar
Thor665
Papa Smurf
Papa Smurf
Posts: 33454
Joined: October 11, 2009
Location: Venice, FL

Post Post #1241 (ISO) » Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:01 am

Post by Thor665 »

In post 1108, Sugar Cain wrote:What the Smurf is this Smurf? Not surprised that Amrun was willing to vote us but Thor, Smurfing Thor. You are better than this.
Am I?
What do you think of my case?
In post 1110, Jon Doe wrote:You seem to exude confidence and never second guess yourself. Would this be a fair assumption?
I certainly extrovert both of those things.
In post 1111, Jon Doe wrote:Who said we were town reading you? That is overconfidence. I just liked something and I said that.
I wasn't aware there was a like/dislike axis of gameplay. There *is* a town/scum axis, and I presumed 'like' was an alternate word for 'town'.
What did you mean? Simply that you'd like to come over for tea and crumpets sometime? Maybe do a puzzle together? Ride a rollercoaster?
In post 1153, MattP wrote:They've done enough scummy things that just dont make sense from town to be probabilistically scum-oriented
You've named a batch of three players that you think are town that look scummy - so what is so odd about his scumminess compared to theirs and your own?
Functionally you're name calling him and then taking his offense and trying to craft it as a scum tell - which is the EXACT thing you warned that scum would try to do your group of three.
So...wtf?
In post 1167, MattP wrote:All that you've done since I've called you out is constantly insult me. You have not tried to talk to me at all, you immediately because incredibly aggressive and overdefensive. I don't think town do that.
Yeah, town are NEVER aggressive or overdefensive.
What alignment did Majiffy just flip? Scum, right - musta been scum.
In post 1176, MattP wrote:So despite you having a QT to discuss this stuff your hydra partner said NOTHING over the duration of the ENTIRE day phase in the QT about flavor analysis?
Which would justify him asking in thread for his partner to come talk to him.
Town-ta-town-town-town...
In post 1195, sangres wrote:While I finish catching up I have something to say.

If Trust Fund was vigged then the vig needs to sit down and take stock of his/her life because that would be one of the dumbest vig kills of all time.
The only 'Vig' kill that makes any sense of the three was Chesskid.
And I'm pretty certain that was a zombie kill, so...
In post 1207, Desperado wrote:Why is everyone saying the like/agree with my pitoli case but not voting it
Because they're too busy voting town.
What do you think of my Sugar Cain case?

I will admit I am somewhat ameliorated that Matt decided to call John town...but then he leapt right back onto OGML which is equally derp. So he can still answer my attacks above.
User avatar
MattP
MattP
Dr. Feelgood
User avatar
User avatar
MattP
Dr. Feelgood
Dr. Feelgood
Posts: 13356
Joined: August 22, 2011
Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre

Post Post #1242 (ISO) » Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:05 am

Post by MattP »

My push was me trying to pressure him to be scummy? Because he had done enough things that could be construed as scum-aligned moves that I wanted to push him. I knew his partner posted the brief explanation we reiterated in thread, the point was to see if he would immediately defend himself with that or if there was genuine lying of hydra dissonance

Also I NEVER name called Jon Doe so I have no idea what you're talking about

And I just very quickly skimmed what you just posted so I probably didn't answer everything so pls repeat anything I missed tia
SlappyKrust
User avatar
MattP
MattP
Dr. Feelgood
User avatar
User avatar
MattP
Dr. Feelgood
Dr. Feelgood
Posts: 13356
Joined: August 22, 2011
Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre

Post Post #1243 (ISO) » Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:06 am

Post by MattP »

You're acting as if I was pushing him solely to get him lynched and that therefore my entire case was intended to see him at L-0, when if you recognize that I was pushing him to get a better read on him, which is obvious from my immediate jump off when I got the better read, it wasn't ridiculous that I was using hyperbole to try to pressure him
SlappyKrust
User avatar
MattP
MattP
Dr. Feelgood
User avatar
User avatar
MattP
Dr. Feelgood
Dr. Feelgood
Posts: 13356
Joined: August 22, 2011
Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre

Post Post #1244 (ISO) » Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:08 am

Post by MattP »

AND you're saying it's derp that I'm on OGML and yet I don't have a good read of OGML so why would I NOT be on him right now if I don't have a clear scumread? It's day 2 and day 1 was 24 hours long. I'm trying to sift through 20+ players and figure out their alignment. It's not easy especially when the majority of players have 10 or less posts and have been completely ignored.
SlappyKrust
User avatar
MattP
MattP
Dr. Feelgood
User avatar
User avatar
MattP
Dr. Feelgood
Dr. Feelgood
Posts: 13356
Joined: August 22, 2011
Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre

Post Post #1245 (ISO) » Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:09 am

Post by MattP »

In post 1241, Thor665 wrote:Functionally you're name calling him
Actually, please quote EXACTLY where this happened so that I know you're not just being accusatory for the sake of being accusatory and are actually reading the thread King of the Scum
SlappyKrust
User avatar
Amrun
Amrun
Killed the Radio Star
User avatar
User avatar
Amrun
Killed the Radio Star
Killed the Radio Star
Posts: 22501
Joined: January 24, 2011
Location: East Coast US

Post Post #1246 (ISO) » Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:17 am

Post by Amrun »

Guys!!! I am caught up! Are you proud of me?

Okay, first thoughts upon having re-read today including what I missed:

Jon Doe:


-Can you link me to the newbie game you reference? What was your stance on wKing in that game? What was your alignment? What was GiF's?

-What was OMGL's scumslip?

-Is GiF still scum? Is OGML still scum?

For the record, though, you made a statement about GuyInFreezer not being lazy. That isn't true. Sometimes he's lazy, and sometimes he isn't. I just finished a town game with him where he literally did NOTHING the whole game -- like, ACTUALLY fuck all nothing, basically prod dodged the entire game.



OGML


Do you agree that if Trust Fund ISN'T the scum kill, that makes Jon Doe less likely to be scum? If Jon Doe isn't scum, who is? Why?


Thor


If Sugar Cain isn't scum, who is? Why? What do you think of the StupendousKey wagon yesterday? What is your read on OMGL?


pitoli


Pitoli, you said the wagon yesterday was scumdriven. Who is scum on the wagon, and why?

What is your read on OMGL?


VOTE: pitoli
I survived
Tigerpocalypse 2011


Fusion Mafia, ongoing now.
User avatar
Thor665
Thor665
Papa Smurf
User avatar
User avatar
Thor665
Papa Smurf
Papa Smurf
Posts: 33454
Joined: October 11, 2009
Location: Venice, FL

Post Post #1247 (ISO) » Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:23 am

Post by Thor665 »

In post 1242, MattP wrote:My push was me trying to pressure him to be scummy? Because he had done enough things that could be construed as scum-aligned moves that I wanted to push him. I knew his partner posted the brief explanation we reiterated in thread, the point was to see if he would immediately defend himself with that or if there was genuine lying of hydra dissonance

Also I NEVER name called Jon Doe so I have no idea what you're talking about

And I just very quickly skimmed what you just posted so I probably didn't answer everything so pls repeat anything I missed tia
:neutral:
In post 1244, MattP wrote:AND you're saying it's derp that I'm on OGML and yet I don't have a good read of OGML so why would I NOT be on him right now if I don't have a clear scumread? It's day 2 and day 1 was 24 hours long. I'm trying to sift through 20+ players and figure out their alignment. It's not easy especially when the majority of players have 10 or less posts and have been completely ignored.
You called me scummy for being on Sugar Cain.
How do you define them as different acts?
In post 1245, MattP wrote:
In post 1241, Thor665 wrote:Functionally you're name calling him
Actually, please quote EXACTLY where this happened so that I know you're not just being accusatory for the sake of being accusatory and are actually reading the thread King of the Scum
Please quote your understanding of what the word 'functionally' means.

@Amrun - I feel I have implicitly answered one of those questions and *explicitly* answered two of them already. Do you really have no idea my read on OGML or about the Stupendous wagon yesterday? I've stated both multiple times. How well do you feel you've read?
User avatar
Sugar Cain
Sugar Cain
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Sugar Cain
Goon
Goon
Posts: 814
Joined: May 4, 2013

Post Post #1248 (ISO) » Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:36 am

Post by Sugar Cain »

In post 1241, Thor665 wrote:
In post 1108, Sugar Cain wrote:What the Smurf is this Smurf? Not surprised that Amrun was willing to vote us but Thor, Smurfing Thor. You are better than this.
Am I?
What do you think of my case?
When you have a town pm you are.

I think your "I don't have a case/I wasn't awed by their posting/lemme go make a case/oh but I don't like the two leading wagons so I'M GOING TO HANG MY HAT ELSEWHERE" is craptastic and the case itself is no better. Pretty much everything in your "case" is stuff Mara did. Though we both did have scum reads on TF and John Doe. If you think us voting for someone that flipped town makes us scum then you are retarded or scum. What's this "bad start to day 2" junk about?
User avatar
MattP
MattP
Dr. Feelgood
User avatar
User avatar
MattP
Dr. Feelgood
Dr. Feelgood
Posts: 13356
Joined: August 22, 2011
Location: on honeymoon at red lobster with chevre

Post Post #1249 (ISO) » Sun Aug 04, 2013 9:48 am

Post by MattP »

In post 1247, Thor665 wrote:
In post 1242, MattP wrote:My push was me trying to pressure him to be scummy? Because he had done enough things that could be construed as scum-aligned moves that I wanted to push him. I knew his partner posted the brief explanation we reiterated in thread, the point was to see if he would immediately defend himself with that or if there was genuine lying of hydra dissonance

Also I NEVER name called Jon Doe so I have no idea what you're talking about

And I just very quickly skimmed what you just posted so I probably didn't answer everything so pls repeat anything I missed tia
:neutral:
Cool, glad we got that line of conversation over with
In post 1247, Thor665 wrote:
In post 1244, MattP wrote:AND you're saying it's derp that I'm on OGML and yet I don't have a good read of OGML so why would I NOT be on him right now if I don't have a clear scumread? It's day 2 and day 1 was 24 hours long. I'm trying to sift through 20+ players and figure out their alignment. It's not easy especially when the majority of players have 10 or less posts and have been completely ignored.
You called me scummy for being on Sugar Cain.
How do you define them as different acts?
Because I think different things when I push different people, since as a human being I generally have altering reasons for different actions I take, and when I call one person scum (Jon Doe) it does not have the same meaning as a different scenario where I call someone scummy (you), since both motives and intensity of reads can change. In the situation with Jon Doe, I wasn't trying to push a lynch through at the time I started pushing him, because that would have required me being positive about the read. I obviously was not positive about the read, otherwise I wouldn't have wasted my time trying to get him to prove his scumminess or towniness with the reaction test regarding his QT knowledge.

As for me calling you scummy for a Sugar Cain push, I called you scummy because I think your tone was scummy. Let's compare to the Jon Doe slot. Intensity of read? I thought your action was less weakly scum-oriented than my initial points on Jon Doe. Motivation-wise did I call your action scummy? I wasn't trying to push you, I was talking to fellow people I thought were town so that they knew my stance. Why am I not motivated to push you? Because I don't think a Thor wagon right now is lucrative. Why is that? Because I don't read you any better under pressure than not under pressure, so there's nothing positive to gain for me right now in pushing you. I'll push you when I'm confident of a scumread on you. You're more experienced that most players that I would pressure. I don't push CES either in games. I avoid placing pressure on experienced scum players to derive information, I push experienced scum players when I want them lynched.
In post 1247, Thor665 wrote:
In post 1245, MattP wrote:
In post 1241, Thor665 wrote:Functionally you're name calling him
Actually, please quote EXACTLY where this happened so that I know you're not just being accusatory for the sake of being accusatory and are actually reading the thread King of the Scum
Please quote your understanding of what the word 'functionally' means.
I would actually like you to show me anything that was functionally name-calling against Jon Doe. The entire conversation with him I felt incredibly impartial about being rude in response to him. If you show me something that was functionally name calling I'll agree to it, but currently it looks like you made a throwaway statement that served no purpose but to antagonize me. Please prove me wrong.
SlappyKrust
Locked