The Walking Dead Mafia! ( Game Over )

[No Brains Here]

I just realized something.

We need to get Jon Doe and Sugar Cain to claim.

Can we run them up quickly?

[Amrun]

Why?

[Sugar Cain]

....................................

Why is everyone so retarded?

Why should we claim, Mollie?

[No Brains Here]

Why should we claim, Mollie?

DGB here.

You might have killed Trust Fund.

[Ms Marangal]

DBG, we promise you we don't have any capability to kill, Period

~Sugar

[Sugar Cain]

yeah, that didn't happen.

[Sugar Cain]

yeah, that didn't happen.

[Sugar Cain]

DBG, we promise you we don't have any capability to kill, Period

~Sugar

[Sugar Cain]

DBG, we promise you we don't have any capability to kill, Period

~Sugar

Thanks for fixing my quote Nero!

[No Brains Here]

K then Jon Doe. It's Jon Doe.

[Sugar Cain]

YAY!!!! I was right.

[Titus]

No. I have no capability to kill either. Like I mentioned, my FORMER other head had a lot of conflict with trust fund that I disagreed with. I have no ability to kill.

Waynegg was ejected. I'm playing on alone.

[Venmar]

Jon Doe has been replaced by Titus, one of the players who was part of the hydra.

[Titus]

And Jon doe, that answer grows old. Find out why one of you did something so stupid, explain why, and start signing your damn posts.

If the post wasn't signed or having arrows to it having me claim it, my other head did it. I find it annoying when Hydras don't sign.

[MattP]

If I was wrong to change my read on Jon Doe I'll be sadpanda

[Sugar Cain]

Titus, please respond to 1344 and 1357 plox.

[No Brains Here]

Never mind then

I must be on crack.

Let's lynch OGML MOAR!!!

[Thor665]

If I was wrong to change my read on Jon Doe I'll be sadpanda

Try to describe why he's scummy.
Then recognize it was probably a good switch, yeah?

[Titus]

Sugar and OGML are both consistent with how the nightkills went down.

WHAT is this?


This is basically, after the Trust Fund flip, I would expect scum to start attacking us hard for no reason. Given the fact both of you have voted us, you being scum is consistent with my view of how the nightkills went down.

Sugar's voting pattern has been erratic at best.

So that's the only reason you suspect us other than "Sugar and GIF being the most talked about in the thread"

Absolutely not. Wayne laid down the meta case against GiF. As for you, your over the top reactions and general behavior in the thread make me paranoid enough. Then, there is Thor's case which is decent but I don't fully trust Thor. I have bigger fish to fry than you. I might change my mind in the mean time.

Over the top reactions and general behavior? Way to be vague. Yes, Thor and Amrun calling us scum out the fucking blue with little or no reasoning was pretty derptastic. AJ selectively scumhunting us was pretty bad, too. I'm going to react but I don't think my reaction to ANYTHING has been over the top.

This sounds like an opinion bordering on an discredit. If you have a question, please rephrase.

Also note, that our hydra was scumreading John Doe on day 1 as well. Their claim that they are being attacked over the Trust Fund kill is stupid stupid stupid.

Why you think that scum would attack you over the TF kill?

Who are your top 4 scum reads?

Scum attack over the TF kill makes sense. The process goes as follows, kill a failed lynch train, claim the biggest player pushing the train is scum, find whatever reason you can to FoS that player and try to link the kill to them. I figured I'd preempt the scums by highlighting this is a likely play.

Sugar, GiF, and OMGL are my big three. I don't have a fourth yet. My other head, before he vanished, liked Thor. I keep going back and forth on him though.

[No Brains Here]

Scum attack over the TF kill makes sense. The process goes as follows, kill a failed lynch train, claim the biggest player pushing the train is scum, find whatever reason you can to FoS that player and try to link the kill to them. I figured I'd preempt the scums by highlighting this is a likely play.

\

Nah.

That would be extremely unconvincing.

[Sugar Cain]

Sugar and OGML are both consistent with how the nightkills went down.

WHAT is this?


This is basically, after the Trust Fund flip, I would expect scum to start attacking us hard for no reason. Given the fact both of you have voted us, you being scum is consistent with my view of how the nightkills went down.

Sugar's voting pattern has been erratic at best.

So that's the only reason you suspect us other than "Sugar and GIF being the most talked about in the thread"

Absolutely not. Wayne laid down the meta case against GiF. As for you, your over the top reactions and general behavior in the thread make me paranoid enough. Then, there is Thor's case which is decent but I don't fully trust Thor. I have bigger fish to fry than you. I might change my mind in the mean time.

Over the top reactions and general behavior? Way to be vague. Yes, Thor and Amrun calling us scum out the fucking blue with little or no reasoning was pretty derptastic. AJ selectively scumhunting us was pretty bad, too. I'm going to react but I don't think my reaction to ANYTHING has been over the top.

This sounds like an opinion bordering on an discredit. If you have a question, please rephrase.

Oh, I'm just calling you on your bullshit. I figured you might disagree but its nice that you agree that you of full of it.

Also note, that our hydra was scumreading John Doe on day 1 as well. Their claim that they are being attacked over the Trust Fund kill is stupid stupid stupid.

Why you think that scum would attack you over the TF kill?

Scum attack over the TF kill makes sense. The process goes as follows, kill a failed lynch train, claim the biggest player pushing the train is scum, find whatever reason you can to FoS that player and try to link the kill to them. I figured I'd preempt the scums by highlighting this is a likely play.

And again, I'm countering your point. We were already scumreading you on day 1 so your "oh woe is me, we're being attacked 'cause TF died" is nothing but a discredit.

[Titus]

I don't agree with myself that I'm full of it. Your expressed opinion (if you can call it that) is that I'm lying. I brought up the claim, knowing what would likely happen and you're claiming it's a personal attack on you? The theory is that scum would be SOMEWHERE on the people who were going to show up to attack me. Again, you take it personally. Yet, you wonder why I say you're overreacting.

[Titus]

**God even answering that got twisted. I don't agree with your opinion that I'm full of it.

[Sugar Cain]

I think you are very full of it and here's why. #1 You are claiming that I'm overreacting by defend myself and denying allegations.

I never claimed that you were personally attacking me.

I think your "TF died and now I'm going to get attacked" is weak and given that we were attacking you BEFORE TF died seems nothing like a big OMGUS and/or an inability to think critically.

Even if you hold the theory that scum are attacking you, I find it odd that you are ignoring AJ.

[Sugar Cain]

I think you are very full of it and here's why. #1 You are claiming that I'm overreacting by defend myself and denying allegations.

I never claimed that you were personally attacking me.

I think your "TF died and now I'm going to get attacked" is weak and given that we were attacking you BEFORE TF died seems nothing like a big OMGUS and/or an inability to think critically.

Even if you hold the theory that scum are attacking you, I find it odd that you are ignoring AJ.