In post 1473, MattP wrote:I don't like your line of questioning because I don't believe you really think it's a useful line of questioning.
People have accused me of that multiple times when I've been town.
I've even explained the concept behind my questioning before, it's really quite simple. I look for the logic behind actions - oh, hey, look, that's what you're whining that I'm doing. How odd it is to look for the logic behind actions, certainly that cannot be taken as looking for motivations and scumhunting!
In post 1473, MattP wrote:I think you're trying to lead me by the leash and make me subservient to you by making me feel like I have something to prove to you.
This sounds kinky and weird.
If I was going to do it I'd at least pick a cuter player to do it to.
In post 1473, MattP wrote:It's like you're trying to shut me up and trying to prevent me from having any sort of leadership role by calling me scum and keeping me absorbed in trying to please you with roundabout questioning.
Or I'm reacting to your leadership by demanding logic from someone who wants a leadership role.
In post 1473, MattP wrote:you JUST SO HAPPEN to have every single powerful player in the game as a scum read and have tried getting every single player that has power to look bad.
I have Sangres and Amrun as town, or at least 'not scum' currently. Oh, hey, look, power players who use logic.
Also, seriously, you're saying my scum plan is, what, call all the potent players scum and...what? Yes, because that will assuredly not put me at lynch risk.
YOU'VE FIGURED OUT MAH SCUM PLAN!
Confirm yourself then - then I'll go away. I could work with that.
Or, y'know, just answer what my logical fallacy was - y'know, the one you claim exists and that I claim doesn't. You could just show that I'm a liar and weaken me and strengthen yourself all in one fell swoop - it would also help you get others to lynch me.
