AD, I've presented a case for. I've explained why he's a scumread, shown crystal-clear evidence
@underlined: Games I've played with you are invitational 15 and Maestro's NY 161. There is a huge difference in Meta from those games + this game compared to Pikmen mafia. --->In post 2086, mastin2 wrote:Now, to offer a proper explanation for my AD scumread, to borrow a bit from more arrogant scumhunters, the reason I'm voting him is that he's scum. Simple as that. But since y'all need more than that, AD's posts here are a dead-ringer for Pinkmin Mafia, and do not have that feeling of pro-townness that I remember coming from him in whatever game(s) I saw him as town in. (I recall there being at least one or two, but heck if I remember which games they are.)Furthermore, beyond the meta, there's the (lack of) content in them; his posting is largely shallow and empty. Heck, his entire reason for voting me is very largely OMGUS in nature, because I voted him. Of all my scumreads, none are stronger than my scumread on him.
@bolded: namely that there is content in my posts, not too much only due to activity, but there is actual analysis (whereas I gave none in Pikmen). You call your case crystal clear yet but the underlined and bolded are general accusations. no specific example of lack of content is offered.
You say my vote was OMGUS in nature yet that's mere babble from you considering when I voted you I was pretty specific as to why:
In post 1580, ActionDan wrote:What Mastin's post does:
Lists unlynchable town reads:
Elaborates on lesser town reads and perhaps nulls and weak scum reads:
Votes a scum read with no elaboration:
Tells everyone that game will be won not by lynching scum but by not lynching town.
Individually these actions are fine:Together it plays into the claimed narrative of working from the 'protect town' perspective more than feels necessary. I would have thought at least more words would be spent on an explanation of why mastin has a scumread on me and then perhaps reasoning as to why mastin is voting me over other reads. As it is now, smells of votepark on low content/activity target.
The bolded by itself would describe OMGUS had I objected for that reason alone. But I clearly said that that would have been fine had it not been accompanied by the rest. This is fleshed out precisely in the italicized.
Not only that but the last sentence is an equivalent description of your "case".
Note I am ignoring your further allegations past the point of voting for me in your post centered around town blocs. Since they are trivial/ridiculous or false