OK, you ask me what exactly do I mean, then you try to justify it in your next paragraph.In post 65, LnGrrrR wrote:What exactly do you mean by "You're trying to use that as a scum-tell when none of them have even flipped scum yet."
Of course they haven't flipped yet; I just noted the odd interaction. I don't know if any of them ARE scum, but I mention it so when I review later or I get killed, I at least have it noted in my ISO. I only stated it felt "off" to me because that is how it feels: it doesn't necessarily make any of them scum, but once one of them flips I can review.
Obviously I think Squilly's voting pattern/play this game have been scummy, but I think it's suspicious how he has voted only CDB and Amrun. Yes, it might be me being overly paranoid, but I find it better to be paranoid early than to be too trusting.
Tell me Fegelin, what do you think of the interaction between Amrun and Channel? What do you think of Squilly's votes?
@Jason, still waiting for you to tell us whether you are going to explain your vote or not.
It still comes off as you trying to attack 3 players at once with no evidence whatsoever.
Yes, but you can be neither too paranoid or too trusting.
Interaction between the two seems genuine, the shift in CBD's read seems legit even though I still don't get #51. Squilly's votes are indicative not of allegiance but of experience.
I regret having you as an early scum-read now.Amrun wrote:That's exactly my point. If it isn't, you're not playing the game. Your next post after rvs was "Amrun is STILL scum," implying I was scum in rvs because "I'm always scum." If you have a legitimate scumread on me, step up to the plate because you're not playing.
But you voted Amrun for an RVS reason...JasonWazza wrote:I had a scum read on you, when i voted.
UNVOTE: LnGrrrR
VOTE: JasonWazza
Half of it is gut, the other half is his tone, it seems clear and non-artificial.StubbsKVM wrote:Fegelein, is there a specific reason you got that townread on channel?