In post 108, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:I guess one could argue that Klick posted a few things ( non informative and not useful) early on and than disappeared.
He could be a scum hiding out but I think that it is still a little early in the game to really say. Personally I would like to wait a bit longer to see what happens. we still have a while till day one is over, I don't necessarily think we need to get a quick kill. I think we should hold off and try to get as much feed on each other as we can
. I do find it odd that Klick is getting votes without explanation. I am not sure if they are RV or not
In post 123, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Vote Klick
Heres why
1) He been smudging the truth. While he prob has been busy ( I read him admitting this in post in another game he is in) he still has manage to post several times in the Fire and Ice game. He has pretty much been MIA for this game
2)
when he does post he add nothing to the conversation. He just post enough not to get kicked out
. In the other game it seems like he giving atleast a pretty decent response to whats going on
3) He doesnt seem al that interested in whats going on in this game. While this could be just because its early in the game or he feels the game is slow to me it feels like he just hiding out. Being busy is good excuse since many people would not look to see if he has been active on the other forum.
He is giving all the signs of a scum who is hiding out waiting for the townies to lynch each
Krazey- For some reason I cant shake the feeling that scummy.
Spade- You seemed to trying hard to make a case against me with very little evidence and some really bad logic
Isn't that EXACTLY what you did for a majority of the start? Anywho, a vote based on inactivity and hypocrisy.
In post 129, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Oh, Sorry Guys I honest did not know what I did was illegal. There are a bunch of rules ( feels like a zillion) here at this site . I did read them all but there so hard to remember them all especially with the memory problem I have. If you want to kick me out of the game for breaking the rules thats fine. I wil understand/
Bc I based my evidence on something thats not allowed on this site. i will unvote Klick. It is the right thing to do. I hope you do not take this as evidence for or against me being scummy
Unvote klickj
As far as the question Gnomeo asked I did answer it. I have not ignored him. I said it was not relevant to the game in my opinion , I am sticking to that answer.
I will be AFK all day. Real life beacons,
Unvoting because a rule was broken, not because of a town-read
In post 163, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:From the understanding of the rules all the evidence I stated is valid except the first point, Taking in that and the fact Klick has tried voting for himself I think it is reasonable to find him scummy.
Vote Klick
What is V/LA - is that vacation and leave of absence ?????
And now that you weren't mod-killed, you vote again
In post 180, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Sorry Om but Im not pushing a vote based on his suicide vote( This action was just the icing on the cake.) Remember I voted for him but retracted bc I accidentally broke a rule. I felt at the time and still do that retracting my vote till I got a response from the mod was the right thing to do. I did not want to base my votes on anything i was not suppose to. After i got an okay from the mod I reevaluated the evidence that was okay to use and made a decision to stick with the decisions to vote for Klick. His vote only reinforced my decision that I already made. I would of voted for him whether he voted for himself or not.
Not my last post was a response to a question Trumpet asked. I thought trumpet was asking about a time I saw a goon or werewolf suicide. I might of misunderstood his question.Anyways I gave an example of a time when this happened. I did humbly admit and still do that townies do suicide to. I never experience this happening but based on experiences at this site it has happened. I hope that I will get the same courtesy.
@Krazey- LOL- You and Gnomeo kept pushing about my experience so I answered it. Its not rambling
In post 173, TrumpetKing wrote:Klick's reaction has given me a bit more of a townie vibe off of him. Because my vote was intended mostly for pressure for him to wake up (I did understand Fuzzy's points, which did contribute, as well as my own point, but the vote was more to apply pressure), I'm going to
UNVOTE: Klick.
Fuzzy is my next top suspect, for reasons I've already stated, and the fact he thought self voting was scummy. However this could mean he's a noob on the other site he's on as well, but it may not be. I'm willing to support a Fuzzy case right now. Fuzzy, if it's such a problem to describe your experience on another site, that's scummy as well, because it seems like you don't want to be caught in your scummy act. Quit trying to pull the noob card and attempt to defend yourself.
VOTE: TheFuzzylogic99
Review edit: You've basically just said you've had a bit of experience. Yeah, you're pinging me more with that. Have fun pretending to be noob.
In post 180, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote: After i got an okay from the mod I reevaluated the evidence that was okay to use and made a decision to stick with the decisions to vote for Klick. His vote only reinforced my decision that I already made. I would of voted for him whether he voted for himself or not.
so you admitted to retracting a vote and then revoting for no solid reasoning other than the option of a modkill
In post 182, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:What can i say....I was asked a question and I answered it. You pushed for me to answer Gnomeo question and I did. Theres nothing more to it.
Its is a bit annoying that I was asked a question and when I finally answered it I get attacked for doing so. Hey if you attack me for answering a question have fun.
Hers the facts
Kick has been posting in other games but not here.
He has been posting relevant info in other games an only came here to make non relevant post and RV
He seems very disinterested in the game and any scum hunting. ( Note if he is scum there is no real need to scum hunt. He can just wait for us townie to lunch each other)
all these activities points to a scum hiding out
I think it is not unreasonable for Klick to convince us why we should find his action scummy
Klick hasn't said anything scummy that I can see. The only basis of these votes is inactivity.
In post 185, TheFuzzylogic99 wrote:Hmm.. did not mean to skim the rules. Really hoping I dont get Mod killed.
I think I played 1 multi scum game but I mange to get myself killed early so I dont have much experience with those. I would assume that hiding out would be still a relevant strategy however you might be right. I think I wll rethink this notion. I have played mainly 1 scum team and townies.
I havent seen him post anything all that relevant, so for now I will disagree with you that pointI did not find the reaction test all that useful and it came off to me as a RV..As far as the ferret wagon I do not see the rationale of that. I have not seen any evidence for ferret being Scum . Honestly I am reading him as a townie/.
For now
unvote Klick
And again, because there's a potential mod-kill, you back off
No questions asked,
VOTE: Fuzzy
You are so back-and-forth on this, it's making me dizzy. You strike me as the scum who's trying to draw attention away from yourself, so you picked Klick. And yes, he could be scum for being inactive on this thread. But there's no concrete evidence to back it up other than "I say he's scum so yeah..."
You
, on the other hand, have been trying to lynch Klick based on inactivity, only to retract your vote when there is a threat of your removal.
Plus, since this is multi-scum setup. Who's to say both of you are not scum?
