In post 155, goodmorning wrote: In post 152, BROseidon wrote:It's relevant because it makes my point against kdub less valid, although I'm still okay with parking my vote there until I see something better.
Why do you think the hop is a point against your VCA thing?
Empty feeling question here.
In post 188, goodmorning wrote: In post 184, Kdub wrote:goodmorning: What is your read on BRO? Who are your suspects at the moment?
BRO looks a bit of a VI atm, not sure what to think of him.
Suspects currently: one of the neg. utility claims, still haven't figured out which yet but leaning towards TMTOL, and you.
Your play was certainly not VI. Declining to give a read at all? Reads like scum not sure if they're going to have to bus their partner.
In post 189, BROseidon wrote:I'm playing like a VI right now.
And yes I'm aware that announcing a vote as a pressure vote defeats the purpose. However, I don't believe that any vote made within the first few pages can be anything other than a pressure vote. What're you going to do, lynch someone on page 3?
GM why are you leaning towards letters?
Another empty feeling question between you two.
In post 192, goodmorning wrote:
Out of the three he's contributed the least content.
That said it's giving me a bit of a headache because his claim is objectively stronger than the other two.
Come to think of it MC hasn't done much recently, but his early game stuff was quite solid.
AS has the weakest claim but unless they're faking their content they just are acting really Town.
And here's the answer. Nothing substantive. You two then go on to push the Kdub wagon pretty steadily, yet you never really converse with each other about why. And then come Day Two you distance like mad, to the point where you (BRO) don't even slightly pursue your GM scum read.
In post 704, BROseidon wrote: In post 703, penguin_alien wrote:And what if I fessed up to being an odd-night cop? Bork claimed after everyone else; why would scum-bork make a claim that's out of line with the apparent mechanics? GM managed to fake X-shotness, after all. And in role madness, bork could have easily claimed he was saving his shots for when we were at likely one scum to function as a cop, eliminating the question of why he didn't use them pronto.
Then I would admit that bork being even-night is not a good argument against his claim.
And GM didn't fake being X-shot. He faked being town. He even claimed 1-shot, which is what he flipped.
Your interaction with her claim is odd as well. First you forgot she hadn't claimed (which, if she was really a scum suspect, seems unlikely) and then you say later that she claimed 1-shot when she clearly claimed X-shot:
In post 586, goodmorning wrote: In post 573, BROseidon wrote:Also I'm thinking we should massclaim at this point because we are only down to bork being unclaimed.
What ;_;
I am the Dawn Treader, (X)-Shot Commuter. I did not commute last night.
There's just a lot of little things that don't feel right.
BROseidon (3) TMTOLBTWNTOF, penguin_alien, borkjerfkin (LYNCH) 