No idea if that is accurate.In post 12, Saki wrote:It's Xegarus and zMuffinMan.
Liking them for town so far.
No idea if that is accurate.In post 12, Saki wrote:It's Xegarus and zMuffinMan.
it's not so much that you did it, but the way in which you did it.fuduzn wrote:Right so poking someone a bit about the way a post was worded is obv scum tell now.
elaborate on why poirot seems rather town to you.rebel wrote:Peirot, Rail Tracer, and Brian all seem rather town from early game.
hopefully hp will explain why his hatred for hydras from 2 years ago has carried over into this game.isaac wrote:Also, the game takes place in 2011 if I'm reading timestamps correctly.
general rule: don't talk about a closed setup d1. it's not useful information unless discussing a claim (and i don't really think it's worthwhile to discuss the pgo claim at this point in time). setup discussion is an easy way for scum to look like they're doing something useful.isaac wrote: At some point early on in the game, a player mentions there are three scum....
Regarding our set-up:
What assumptions can be safely made?
What assumptions can we not make?
Yes. My avatar is of the Baccano! character Isaac Dian.
In post 84, FuDuzn wrote:Rail, explain my anti town intentions in my questioning? Enlighten us all as to how they are scum and not town motivated?
It is early Day 1, people were still stuck in stupid rvs and rqs or being overly concerned about the hydra infestation in this game, I chose to question a player about something that seemed a big off to me. When they didn't answer my question in a way that satisfied me I prodded a little bit.
Again, explain anti town motivation.
I will not back down from this and will question everyone who is voting me, and those who are apparently too scared too vote me(and that isn't a scum tell?),until I get a solid explanation about this.
Oh and if your response is that this early you can't make solid reads, than you are just making my point.
/pipebomb
A synch with my partner.In post 83, Rail Tracer wrote:what is stopping you from actually voting him?
SOS, this.In post 31, Sound of Silence wrote:Brian Skies concerns me a little. He comes off rather agreeable. He's on my list to meta-check for completed MS games, but given his join date I don't expect to find any.
SOS, this.In post 31, Sound of Silence wrote:Brian Skies concerns me a little. He comes off rather agreeable. He's on my list to meta-check for completed MS games, but given his join date I don't expect to find any.
it's not 'antitown', it just doesn't look town. as an example, i generally consider questions that are designed to get an answer that will give you a better read on someone to be town-looking questions, and questions like the ones you and poirot have been asking are not town questions.fuduzn wrote:Rail, explain my anti town intentions in my questioning?
I didn't answer my question at all. I made an observation. The concern about agreeableness remains, though it's mitigated now that I have a better sense of his prior mafia experience. Not being able to meta him for similar behaviors referencing alignment doesn't change my concern.In post 87, FuDuzn wrote:SOS, this.In post 31, Sound of Silence wrote:Brian Skies concerns me a little. He comes off rather agreeable. He's on my list to meta-check for completed MS games, but given his join date I don't expect to find any.
It just struck me as a bit off that you basically answered your own question, yet felt the need to still post about it. Was a bit unnecessary and I want to find motivation behind it.
In this game it is more about the forest, not the trees.
In post 89, FuDuzn wrote:Mod please delete one......or leave it. Who am I to tell you what to do.
continue on with this line of thinking, because i'm interested in hearing who you think is piggybacking off someone else's suspicion and why you think they're scum.fuduzn wrote:Those piggybacking off of SOS's weariness of me, scum in there me thinks.
We will both post from this account.In post 97, HopefullyCynical wrote:I'm still trying to wrap my head around the concept of a hydra. Why would two people play the same account? And they both have to agree to vote someone, but they play on the same account? This is very confusing to me, and I apologize. SOS not wanting to put a vote on FuDuzn looks scummy, but if he requires the synch like he says then disregard me. Once I better understand hydras I'm going to re-read the thread.
Using SOS as an example, can only one person post on his account? Or at any point could his partner post under his name?