Desperado, you've made a case that you think 3 out of the 4 votes on you were scum, and stated at the very least 2 out of 3 of Myself, F-16, and Rach are in the scum. You also are making the case that Scum wouldn't bus if they could just lie about who they voted for by saying they voted for Gnomeo.In post 846, Desperado wrote:Since you're jumping in in the middle of the conversation, can you tell me what you think happened?In post 843, Toogeloo wrote:So, what reason would the 3 people who have claimed to have voted you tell the truth about it if it would have been just as easy to lie?In post 839, Desperado wrote:Because I don't think there was any reason to buss when they can lie about who they voted.
We've also already established that one liar is present in the Gnomeo votes. So at the most (not the very least) only 2 out of the 3 claimed votes on you is Scum. But if Scum is going to lie about their votes like at the very least one has done, why wouldn't all of them do so?
As I posited earlier, it's my assumption that both you and Gnomeo were scum. I am now considering if Scum split the votes so that regardless which of you or Gnomeo flipped, the other might look better for it, but not know which was going to be the majority side of town, the split was going to be necessary.
F-16 is spot on with his analysis of Desperado's plan and it's all WIFOM. I highly doubt any HOH would even do it considering I just asked to be a pawn yeserday and was shot down. Paranoia indicated there might be a way for the scum to force evict a pawn. You were here when this conversation took place (though you failed to mention anything about it), so are you thinking there is no way for the pawn to get lynched if he was put up against you?