In post 700, Yggdra Union wrote: But that still doesn't prove your alignment, only that you're likely not aligned with them.
I want you to think carefully here.
In my case, "them" applies to both mafia and werewolf since I've been accused as slipping as both.
And since it proves that I'm not aligned with them,
If I'm not aligned with mafia and I'm not aligned with werewolf, then I'm aligned with ________ .
Also as I said, whether someone pushes whatever doesn't matter. The only thing that's important is that the accusations happened.
-L
The 'them' that I refer to there is in reference to your accusers in regards to the second slip.
It is outlining a suspicion that if, say, baldeagle (one of the accusers) is for example, mafia - that you were not mafia, but it doesn't rule out the possibility of you being a werewolf.
In post 698, Yggdra Union wrote:
The factor of multiball
does matter.
Think of this logical process of how the slip happens.
1. A is scum.
2. A knows that there are 5 scums in their team.
3. A knows that town would be looking for 5 scums.
4. Since A knows that he's scum, it is likely for him to subconsciously think that he needs one less scum to find.
It looks fine so far, but here's where it becomes a problem.
This is multiball.
That means that A's team have
less than 5 members
.
In this game, there are either scumteam of two, or scumteam of three.
In order to call something like this a slip, there must be more than 1 "extra town to find" involved!
So what I'm trying to say is that it's possible to see it as a slip in town PoV, but if you look at the scum PoV, it is
not possible
for them to slip like that, because from town PoV there are 5 scum to hunt, but from scum PoV that's not the case, for they legitimately have to hunt for the other scumteam too.
This would all be relevant - IF it was about the number of scum.
It's not about the number of SCUM. The supposed slip was about the number of TOWN.
It wasn't about how many scums you were looking for, the slip was about how many town you thought there were.
Either way, you're frustrated on explaining this - as am I.
While I don't see what you're trying to get at (and maybe I'm just completely missing it), I think you're genuinely convinced that this is true just as much as I am on it not confirming you as town. Despite that, I don't think this is going to go anywhere productive because while in my mind, those points don't confirm you as town, I'm willing to concede enough as the argument itself makes me think of you as leaning more town than scum.
Yay?
I'm going to do another read-through and see if I can't get some better feels.