Mini 1496: The Cash Cabd (Game Over)

notscience · Post Post #475 (ISO) » Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:12 pm

The million dollar question.

Brian Skies · Post Post #476 (ISO) » Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:14 pm

I am at a loss for words right now.

notscience · Post Post #477 (ISO) » Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:15 pm

Nice meaningless one-liner post.

Mario and the Diamonds · Post Post #478 (ISO) » Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:16 pm

Weekend was even busier than the usual busy.

UNVOTE:

Not feeling so confident about my reads now. I'm not up to date at all.

Mario and the Diamonds · Post Post #479 (ISO) » Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:17 pm

Natirasha · Post Post #480 (ISO) » Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:15 pm

Yeah I feel a LOT more comfortable in my vote now.

Rail Tracer · Post Post #481 (ISO) » Sun Sep 15, 2013 4:29 pm

i almost feel like that vote was a "too scummy to be scum" thing...

hm

Titus · Post Post #482 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2013 3:02 am

Frankly, if I didn't comment on something awhile back, it did not stick out to me in the thread during my initial read.

I will reread again and go into detail on RT and DB.

SoS, I was looking at post 255. If you didn't think Rebel slipped, why did you vote for the slot?

Titus · Post Post #483 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2013 3:03 am

I got a blind sheep. I am not liking that.

Rail Tracer · Post Post #484 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2013 3:04 am

titus wrote:and go into detail on RT

i have popcorn. ready and waiting.

Sound of Silence · Post Post #485 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2013 3:14 am

In post 482, Titus wrote:SoS, I was looking at post 255. If you didn't think Rebel slipped, why did you vote for the slot?

I did not think Rebel had slipped. I've never seen Nacho slip as scum. Sorting him is not that easy. I decided to vote him because I wasn't getting very far in sorting him at that point.

Once again, the word "slip" in 255 refers to my posting with my main account in the previous post instead of this one. It had nothing to do with the vote itself.

Dessew · Post Post #486 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2013 5:58 am

In post 472, Rebel Without a Pulse wrote:
In post 446, Dessew wrote:Rebel: I kind of belived him the 1., I didn't look it up, and it does come off bad, after all. But his answers 3, 5, 6, 9, 9, 10 were proper, and his other answers (except 1 and 2, but the latter isn't a big deal) make sense, too. But, yes, there's that fisrt one, I can't find the part in that post when he calls HP scummy, he gets "town vibes" from HP at the end of his post.
So you think it's logical he's leaning gut town on our slot, when he has only mentioned us in negative ways?

I don't know if I used the word "logical", if I did, it was poor wording, but it's not illogical. He criticized your scumhunting and has a gut-townread on you. One is "technical" the other is about alignment. He still has to clarify regarding his 1. answer.

Cabd · Post Post #487 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2013 6:07 am

Mod note: I sometimes forget to announce prods on-thread, but they're still sent out when due

Vote Count of the First City, Eighth Block

Players Alive: 13
Votes to Lynch: 7
Format of:
Wagon (size): Voters on wagon

Rail Tracer (2): Titus, Daniel Bryan (L-5)
Notscience (1): artemiskitty (L-6)
Dessew (1): Notscience (L-6)

Daniel Bryan (5): Rebel Without a Pulse, Rail Tracer. Brian Skies, Sound of Silence, Natirasha (L-2)

Natirasha (1): Humble Poirot (L-6)
Mario and the Diamonds (1): Mogamma (L-6)
Brian Skies (1): Dessew (L-6)
Not voting: Mario and the Diamonds

Deadline for Day One falls on: 9/23/13 which is (expired on 2013-09-23 19:00:00)

Dessew · Post Post #488 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2013 6:21 am

Cabd, I'm voting Brian.

Cabd · Post Post #489 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2013 6:25 am

In post 488, Dessew wrote:
Cabd, I'm voting Brian.

Fixed.

Rail Tracer · Post Post #490 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2013 6:41 am

remind me why you think brian is scum. has this read changed or been reinforced by any of his posts recently?

notscience · Post Post #491 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2013 3:47 pm

Is anyone else bugged by the lack of another wagon? Everyone seems to be on a different page and not trying to convince people to follow them (which I admittedly am guilty of myself) and it's bugging the shit out of me.

Humble Poirot · Post Post #492 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2013 4:20 pm

I haven't really been here unfortunately. Rough couple of days... Without having reread DB and written about some other things I might've not addressed I'm with RT in the concern of DB's vote.

He apparently doesn't try to defend himself further or discuss, just vote without reason. he doesn't seem to be exasperated or tired, he doesn't seem to be displaying any emotion and the lack of content doesn't seem consistent with his apparent ability to post at least a decent wall.

I'd vote him right now but I'm barely here so I'll just issue the warning, that if he sees this, he should step up and produce something because L-1 is really close.

The new guys should've given new breath to the town but they seem more absent than the old guys... Anyway, bear with me for at least one more day. I'll try to read and post in a decent fashion tomorrow.

HP

Natirasha · Post Post #493 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2013 5:57 pm

See, I'm seeing the DB lynch as noobscum kinda flailing a bit.

Natirasha · Post Post #494 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2013 6:00 pm

In post 491, notscience wrote:Is anyone else bugged by the lack of another wagon? Everyone seems to be on a different page and not trying to convince people to follow them (which I admittedly am guilty of myself) and it's bugging the shit out of me.

This post pings me. Like, it has an illusory valid basis("Why is there no counterwagon"), but when you read into the implications, it sounds to me like he has something to gain from having DB lynched.

Rail Tracer · Post Post #495 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2013 6:27 pm

ns wrote:Is anyone else bugged by the lack of another wagon?

not particularly. the lack of activity by so many players could have something to do with it.

it bothers me in the sense that it's extremely antitown, but it doesn't bother me in the sense that it's unexpected given the current activity.

i'm not sure that dessew is scum anymore. some of his posts look kinda town. why do you still think he's scum?

nati wrote:but when you read into the implications, it sounds to me like he has something to gain from having DB lynched

not really.

Cabd · Post Post #496 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2013 7:16 pm

Subject: Ban/Restriction Announcements

Tierce wrote:Humble Poirot has been banned from signing up for new games for one month for ongoing game discussion and force-replaced from the offending game.

This is the offending game in question. Searching for a replacement.

artemiskitty · Post Post #497 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2013 7:55 pm

In post 491, notscience wrote:Is anyone else bugged by the lack of another wagon? Everyone seems to be on a different page and not trying to convince people to follow them (which I admittedly am guilty of myself) and it's bugging the shit out of me.

Yes. I like you. Please be my rock this game, thank you.

In post 494, Natirasha wrote:
In post 491, notscience wrote:Is anyone else bugged by the lack of another wagon? Everyone seems to be on a different page and not trying to convince people to follow them (which I admittedly am guilty of myself) and it's bugging the shit out of me.
This post pings me. Like, it has an illusory valid basis("Why is there no counterwagon"), but when you read into the implications, it sounds to me like he has something to gain from having DB lynched.

Nope, doesn't ping me at all, but quite the opposite actually.

Humble Poirot · Post Post #498 (ISO) » Mon Sep 16, 2013 11:57 pm

Guys. I'm sorry. It wasn't my intention to need a replacement (I've never had). Hope you have a good game.

Dessew · Post Post #499 (ISO) » Tue Sep 17, 2013 3:03 am

In post 490, Rail Tracer wrote:remind me why you think brian is scum. has this read changed or been reinforced by any of his posts recently?

In post 438, Dessew wrote:Daniel's answer is actually pretty good, I'd like to hear Rebel's response if there's any.
And the Fu-wagon is stalling right now, consider as if my vote was on him, but
UNVOTE: Fu
VOTE: Brian Skies
HP has a big role in this read. First: his #430 is on the spot (maybe his other posts are, too, I won't iso now.) Especially the Daniel-vote seems off, Rebel announced he had a case on him, and Brian joined the wagon with some stupid, made-up reason. And I also don't like that in his read on HP the hydradiscussion is overrepresented, but that's a minor issue in comparison.

His posts after #438 don't really add anything for or against this case. Maybe there's the "you don't read properly" part of his answer to Daniel, which looks like a mild discredit attempt to me, but I only found it after I iso'd him.