^In post 543, Sound of Silence wrote:GiF called it scum apathy. I kinda agree. Mario's last post was terrible, and that came after GiF's posts.In post 538, artemiskitty wrote:Fery - why do you think it's scum apathy from M&tD?
In post 553, Daniel Bryan wrote:We have no counterwagon on me. So, why am I scum? If I was scum, shouldnt I actually be against someone put up by my scumbuddies? Is this happening? Nope? Maybe its because Im town?
In post 524, Sound of Silence wrote:apathetic scum.
Or maybe your scumbuddies decided to bus? Maybe they're weak players and can't properly push a wagon.In post 553, Daniel Bryan wrote:We have no counterwagon on me. So, why am I scum? If I was scum, shouldnt I actually be against someone put up by my scumbuddies? Is this happening? Nope? Maybe its because Im town?
Thank you for stating the most basic obvious statements even.Also, if you do decide to lynch me today, rest assured theres at least 1 and possibly 2 scum on my wagon. Its very safe to jump here because you can just jump on my wagon without people batting an eye. So theres 1 scum already on it. And 1 will jump at the L-1 or hammer.
Still haven't given any reason for Rail Tracer-town.Or, better idea. You'll realize that Im not scum and lynch Rail Tracer
This comment bothers me. I've been mulling it over ever since I first read it. I'm trying to see it in the context of Titus' style of play which is kind of personality-blind, but as an actual intentional strategy it seems wrongheaded in a few dozen ways.In post 528, Titus wrote:I don't really care who is the head of a hydra. I try to treat all players the same unless I know how to communicate with them. Somethings off about that slot to me. I'll figure it out later if I am right but for now my vote stays.
That isn't what he said. He was saying that being inactive isn't the same as actively lurking. And inactive players aren't necessarily scummy. There is nothing in the logic he provided that leads to what you put in quotes, Rebel.In post 549, Rebel Without a Pulse wrote:I would too if he didn't push thatIn post 546, Rail Tracer wrote:and i'm kind of null on mario atm. i don't think it's "apathy" in his posts. he could be town who just has no solid reads (i felt kind of like that a bit earlier in the game). i find the lack of reads more townish than scummy."lurking isn't scummy because I'm an alt and didn't need to lurk"crap earlier. If he was good enough not to lurk as scum, he would be good enough as town to not feed us that sort of thing.
Seriously, Dessew? I thought you were better than that.In post 551, Dessew wrote:About Brian: tbh, I don't see why him reading a completely irrelevant game is town. It's not alignment indicative, imo. Also, my problem isn't that he's going with the flow,the problem is that he didn't say he was going with it,actually, he brought up other reasons. He seems to try to look independent, and I cannot explain it with his personality.
A naked vote on RT and no case. And what happened to your push on me?In post 553, Daniel Bryan wrote:Or, better idea. You'll realize that Im not scum and lynch Rail Tracer
I get the general strategy, personality independence as a bad strategy. It works for me usually. That doesn't mean I ignore history and what players know. I just try to be objective in all observations. Buddying me happens very rarely from those who play with me a lot for this reason.In post 559, Sound of Silence wrote:This comment bothers me. I've been mulling it over ever since I first read it. I'm trying to see it in the context of Titus' style of play which is kind of personality-blind, but as an actual intentional strategy it seems wrongheaded in a few dozen ways.In post 528, Titus wrote:I don't really care who is the head of a hydra. I try to treat all players the same unless I know how to communicate with them. Somethings off about that slot to me. I'll figure it out later if I am right but for now my vote stays.
In post 565, Titus wrote:@Mod: Can we have the nine hours the site was down added back onto the deadline?
Or misinterpreted.In post 564, Titus wrote:@Brian, were you saying Rebel misrepped DB?
In post 566, Cabd wrote:In post 565, Titus wrote:@Mod: Can we have the nine hours the site was down added back onto the deadline?No. Deadline was three weeks, 9 hours is negligible.
There's no shame in admitting you were wrong, Muffin.In post 561, Rail Tracer wrote:i really hate these drive-by post-and-runs by DB. it's so blatantly scummy that it's making me second guess.