It means that StupendousMan is too concerned about making friends, which he admits is, for him, beneficial for scum.
With Cephrir, the impression I get is that he's buddying up to me.
Travel safe!
So you think he's scum capable of asking lazy interest questions, but was unable to ask lazy interest questions in his first push...I dunno, that still feels ganky to me.In post 969, Goat on a Raft wrote:Oh, sure, but only because the setup was already conveniently there from Zdenek's language, which is pretty benign. It's a harmless, no-cost question and one that I don't think requires any level of actually caring about the answer to ask (indeed, the fact that we can see him not caring earlier implies that he still doesn't care this time, he just wanted to be seen to ask).
Can you link the completed town game for the lazy amongst us, and maybe explain the tonal difference?In post 970, PeaceBringer wrote:Thor- the tone is different then the completed town game
We already have Mollie in this game...In post 970, PeaceBringer wrote:I do not do all the stuff folks here do.I guage by reactions, tones and other elements that I will not explain. Some I really cannot even fully put to words anyway as it is a general sense. Here, he comes off as forced. That is my reaction
Why call him town and ding him again on the over politeness?In post 972, Tierce wrote:Notthatnew. Newer than most people here, sure, but don't use that as an excuse. With that said, I believe that slot is Town, but the over-politeness is somewhat concerning.
Hmm, that's an interesting way of looking at it and you may have a point. This head developed the read by reading through the game from the start and noting down individual posts that appeared scummy - it's possible that, in seeing two notes about Stupendous posts when we were done, we have assumed that they can coexist as scumtells.In post 976, Thor665 wrote:So you think he's scum capable of asking lazy interest questions, but was unable to ask lazy interest questions in his first push...I dunno, that still feels ganky to me.
I agree with you that both individual moments can be looked upon as scummy, but I feel the combination of them weakens the overall scum case.
Basically, he is either a scum who will do lazy questions, or a scum who won't care to ask questions...the combo...feels forced. If he is scum I don't think he's scum for the case you're pushing there and it feels like you're trying to overamp the case because you're scum, or it feels like you're town who has started to tunnel.
Want to try to adjust either of those or explain why I'm wrong here?
So I can't be wary and want to be damn sure of who I call Town, especially in a game that is likely multiball and probably has something like 6-8 scum? Good to know. ^__^In post 976, Thor665 wrote:Why call him town and ding him again on the over politeness?In post 972, Tierce wrote:Notthatnew. Newer than most people here, sure, but don't use that as an excuse. With that said, I believe that slot is Town, but the over-politeness is somewhat concerning.
I actually agree that it is weird coming from him, and also agree some of the people handing you pro-town oomph are being odd in general as I haven't seen anything of the sort yet.
I feel like this post is exceedingly fence-sitty and now support the idea of lynching you.
Whassup?
Yeah, I'm not worried about Benmage at the moment.In post 928, Shadoweh wrote:I don't think so. When The Wire and Yoloville were going on at the same time, Benmage was working hard in Wire despite the circumstances that were making him /effort in Yoloville. I guess it's early to say it for sure but language-wise I'd be surprised if he was scum anything.In post 914, Tierce wrote:While I agree with the above and Ihateto use this reasoning, the fact that Benmage is going through difficult stuff IRL may also influence how much of his mood is passing on to his posts, regardless of alignment.
Do you think the whole Thor/Benmage thing is something besides two strong ego's butting heads?
it is in his wiki, so no I am not going to link it. And no, I am not going to explain my thinking further.In post 976, Thor665 wrote:Can you link the completed town game for the lazy amongst us, and maybe explain the tonal difference?
I'm pretty sure I was in a game with him where he was town and I don't feel a difference yet, albeit I haven't seen much from him, but besides him acting polite (like Tierce is noting) I don't see anything really clicking as different to me. Help clue me in here, your case needs sheep, so you need to herd if you believe in it at all.
If I said that it would be sorta odd, wouldn't it? Good thing I didn't.In post 979, Tierce wrote:So I can't be wary and want to be damn sure of who I call Town, especially in a game that is likely multiball and probably has something like 6-8 scum? Good to know. ^__^
I can understand if it worries you. But why defend him and then condone him?In post 979, Tierce wrote:The things he is hitting seem Town. The way he's going at it seems too overly cautious/polite.This worries me. But I guess you can't see it~
You're accusing me of scummy fencesitting for voicing that indecision. So no, I am not misrepresenting your position, because even if you did not word it that way on the first line, the whole post had certainly implied it, as you "now support a lynch" on me for voicing doubts on a Townread.In post 985, Thor665 wrote:If I said that it would be sorta odd, wouldn't it? Good thing I didn't.In post 979, Tierce wrote:So I can't be wary and want to be damn sure of who I call Town, especially in a game that is likely multiball and probably has something like 6-8 scum? Good to know. ^__^
Don't you have issue with me "misrepping" all the time? What do you call this? I don't call it a misrep, i call it an extreme take of a conclusion drawn from what I said...but ten I think that's fine to do in a game in order to see reactions from it. What's your call on this strategy, and if it's not what you're doing here...what are you doing here?I can understand if it worries you. But why defend him and then condone him?In post 979, Tierce wrote:The things he is hitting seem Town. The way he's going at it seems too overly cautious/polite.This worries me. But I guess you can't see it~
If you're unsure of him...why defend?
If you want to defend...why condone?
If your read is truly mixed, why jump into the conversation with "as regards this point you raised that no one asked me about...I have no idea at all!"
I hav no idea or opinion about stuff *all the time*. I don't share it with everyone.
What it felt like was a defense post with an excuse to vote later built it - hence fence-sitty.
Do you not see fence-sitting as scummy...or do you not think what you did was fence sitting - clarify either way pl0x!
In post 987, Tierce wrote:You're accusing me of scummy fencesitting for voicing that indecision. So no, I am not misrepresenting your position, because even if you did not word it that way on the first line, the whole post had certainly implied it, as you "now support a lynch" on me for voicing doubts on a Townread.
WHy not ask a question about your read then, try to start a dialogue about it?In post 987, Tierce wrote:You might not share things with everyone all the time. Neither do I, but Idolike to discuss them from time to time--and doesn't it seem like a logical thing to dowhen you're not sure?
I'll guess it was because it was made as an accusation or question, as opposed to a defense post with a 'but' attached.In post 987, Tierce wrote: I was already looking for word from StupendousMan, so that beautifully-styled fence of mine is older than you think and you didn't seem to have a problem with it then.
Bullshit- crap like this is why I am a fish outta water here- sorry to flake butIn post 976, Thor665 wrote:We already have Mollie in this game...
Hint: it's not pro-town when she does it either.
Additional Hint: when a scumhunting "style" is described as "unexplainable" I always translate that to "illogical and should be ignored because they're making gak up and lack the grapefruits to just say so either to others, and possibly themselves."
You should have married the troll.In post 991, Shadoweh wrote:it turns out being serious makes me boring
notable thing is that the theory under the sea is thrown out due to the replace outIn post 924, Alfred Borden wrote:Eh, honestly, I think your reasons for reading Andy as town are naive. I mean, even when he was scum in The Game That Shall Not Be Mentioned, he seemed to be "having fun" (at least on the surface anyway - we're talking stuff like jovial tone, etc.) and I can see him doing the fake PR thing as either alignment really. Not really concerned about his activity because I know what's going on with him but I just want to see readable content from him and I don't have that yet and I'm not going to give him a pass for it.
she's not scum, but i'm keeping her on the poe list out of spiteIn post 936, Alfred Borden wrote:Oh and I forgot, Nacho, I just looked at your second PoE list again to compare where we're at, and you need to cross Tierce off of it on the double mister. Do you remember what I said about my expertise? This shit is non-negotiable.
Thank you for yielding your scummy ways.In post 950, Thor665 wrote:Well...I did the deflection because I think it is a quite reasonable question. I had committed the least "crime" of your stated issue...yet was the only one attacked. Why not just answer why this was as opposed to deflecting my question by accusing me of deflectionIn post 843, Benmage wrote: There's 2 people voting off it... not very impressed with it either.. but why the Deflection?
-As for theory, I know as scum I love drawing town connections to my scum partners, so yeah if a flip does happen you can paint someone else negatively.
--Especially since its Smurfy reasoning to suspect Safety, but if Safety does flip scum for other reasoning... trying to draw this as a connective tell is simply Smurf.
Functionally you just did as much connection between me and him as I did between Nacho and him...so why is what I did an issue?
I agree that I don't like the case...that said, my connective tell was not based on the name thing, rather it was based on their reaction to the name thing. I made that fairly clear I thought. Does your issue with me work with that, or are you taking my stance as totally different?
Remind me to address this when an ongoing game ends in the very near future. For now, let's just say this is not a strange thing for me to do.In post 975, Tierce wrote:I didn't think it wasthatconfusing.
It means that StupendousMan is too concerned about making friends, which he admits is, for him, beneficial for scum.
With Cephrir, the impression I get is that he's buddying up to me.
Travel safe!
When you consider that Zdenek was one of the people who didn't join Kanye in getting the game started:In post 193, Zdenek wrote:Why are you focussing on Cephir here?In post 43, Goat on a Raft wrote:UNVOTE: StupendousMan, VOTE: Cephrir
Cephrir could have joined kanye in getting the game started. He didn't.
I'd also echo Stupendous' 811, and Zdenek's handling of Thor's claim doesn't show much town thought process either.
Yeah but you're the one who decided that mollie's question wasn't accomplishing anything.In post 814, StupendousMan wrote:When you ask something that accomplishes nothing you are doing nothing to contribute and are either fluff posting or scum. Since it seems like mollie's playstyle involves a decent amount of fluff, I'm going to consider it null.In post 637, Messiah Complex wrote:Why do you care what it can accomplish?
You don't let someone off the hook when they provide no reasoning for their suspicion.In post 637, Messiah Complex wrote:Why so eager to defend yourself?
Desp, I admire your efforts to put a reasonable case together, but I think you can do much better.