N's Notably Narcissistic Nonsensical Namesake (game over)

Mitillos · Post Post #850 (ISO) » Mon Sep 23, 2013 9:43 am

@Luna: Well, now, I have no idea. No one seems to have confirmed that they were targeted by Pere... And he hasn't given us the name of his supposed target. I'm inclined to think he may be scum, but I'm willing to wait until everyone has said something.
I'd like to hear more from RC, too. Her claim needs more information. She claims a guilty result on someone, but has not voted. Seems fairly scummy to me, pointing the finger, but not actually placing the vote. If she's being truthful, of course, Peace needs to go first.

So, what happens now is, I wait some more and suggest that we keep an eye on PereV, RC, Peace and of course, my favourite suspect from yesterday, mnemonic.

What are your thoughts on all this?

BBmolla · Post Post #851 (ISO) » Mon Sep 23, 2013 9:58 am

I'm a naive cop with a guilty on RadiantCowbell, so she should be fairly confirmed town unless anyone claims to have framed her.

DeasVail · Post Post #852 (ISO) » Mon Sep 23, 2013 10:41 am

In post 851, BBmolla wrote:I'm a naive cop with a guilty on RadiantCowbell, so she should be fairly confirmed town unless anyone claims to have framed her.

BBmolla · Post Post #853 (ISO) » Mon Sep 23, 2013 10:46 am

BBmolla · Post Post #854 (ISO) » Mon Sep 23, 2013 10:46 am

I guess there could be a Sanity Switcher that gives me an alternate result or some bullshit.

PeregrineV · Post Post #855 (ISO) » Mon Sep 23, 2013 10:48 am

In post 850, Mitillos wrote:@Luna: Well, now, I have no idea. No one seems to have confirmed that they were targeted by Pere... And he hasn't given us the name of his supposed target. I'm inclined to think he may be scum, but I'm willing to wait until everyone has said something.
I'd like to hear more from RC, too. Her claim needs more information. She claims a guilty result on someone, but has not voted. Seems fairly scummy to me, pointing the finger, but not actually placing the vote. If she's being truthful, of course, Peace needs to go first.

So, what happens now is, I wait some more and suggest that we keep an eye on PereV, RC, Peace and of course, my favourite suspect from yesterday, mnemonic.

What are your thoughts on all this?

I received a message in the night from another player that seems to indicate that they roleblocked me, although is was not called a roleblock.

If they are town, they wasted their time, unfortunately.
If they are scum, they need to do it again tonight.

DeasVail · Post Post #856 (ISO) » Mon Sep 23, 2013 10:50 am

In post 830, RadiantCowbells wrote:I got a guilty on Peacebringer last night >:(

Can you clarify the truthfulness of this? I mean, your lack of vote makes me struggle to take this seriously, but others seem to think it possible you're serious.

I'm thinking of having PV fullclaim, especially since it's unlikely we'll ever be able to confirm him. What do you all think?

BBmolla, tell me to stop asking questions and I will, but otherwise I am confused.

PeregrineV · Post Post #857 (ISO) » Mon Sep 23, 2013 10:50 am

In post 851, BBmolla wrote:I'm a naive cop with a guilty on RadiantCowbell, so she should be fairly confirmed town unless anyone claims to have framed her.

In post 854, BBmolla wrote:I guess there could be a Sanity Switcher that gives me an alternate result or some bullshit.

Naive means always gets innocent regardless of actual alignment.

How can you, as a naive cop, get a guilty at all?

PeregrineV · Post Post #858 (ISO) » Mon Sep 23, 2013 10:51 am

In post 856, DeasVail wrote:Can you clarify the truthfulness of this? I mean, your lack of vote makes me struggle to take this seriously, but others seem to think it possible you're serious.

Exactly.

DeasVail · Post Post #859 (ISO) » Mon Sep 23, 2013 10:56 am

In post 857, PeregrineV wrote:
In post 851, BBmolla wrote:I'm a naive cop with a guilty on RadiantCowbell, so she should be fairly confirmed town unless anyone claims to have framed her.

In post 854, BBmolla wrote:I guess there could be a Sanity Switcher that gives me an alternate result or some bullshit.
Naive means always gets innocent regardless of actual alignment.

How can you, as a naive cop, get a guilty at all?

Well, now that it's out, this is what my problem has been.

Mitillos · Post Post #860 (ISO) » Mon Sep 23, 2013 12:27 pm

@BB: In addition to the whole "naive always gets innocent, what exactly do you mean?" question, I have another one: How do you know you are naive? I thought that generally speaking, a cop wouldn't know that he's not sane, otherwise, what's the point of having it there?

BBmolla · Post Post #861 (ISO) » Mon Sep 23, 2013 12:34 pm

To my role PM!

And Mtillos, I was told I was a Naive Cop, I also know the identity of a Paranoid one.

BBmolla · Post Post #862 (ISO) » Mon Sep 23, 2013 12:35 pm

It says my result will always be innocent.

But I have a guilty on RadiantCowbells.

@mod: If a framer framed someone, and a naive cop investigated that player, what would happen?

Diabolik · Post Post #863 (ISO) » Mon Sep 23, 2013 12:47 pm

In post 826, BBmolla wrote:VOTE: MUM

Wrong.

In post 827, Mitillos wrote:@Molla: You think it's likely that the double-voter will be mafia?

In post 828, BBmolla wrote:I think the role is irrelevent.

No the role is relevant

In post 830, RadiantCowbells wrote:I got a guilty on Peacebringer last night >:(

what u mean with a sad face?

In post 833, PeaceBringer wrote:
In post 830, RadiantCowbells wrote:I got a guilty on Peacebringer last night >:(
that is a lie or you are paranoid...
might as well claim then- my role is Networker. It is negative ultility. There may be logic in my dying, as anyone who has a QT has full access during the day as long as alive. I die they lose it.

IF u re networker this means there are town with a qt, unless u re a scum networker.so town with a qt should be able to confirm u ?

In post 834, Rail Tracer wrote:interesting.

i'm going to take a wild guess that all the town PRs in this game have negative utility associated with them (compulsive framer, "normaliser" what the fuck that means, daytalk enabler), which just makes me that much more curious as to how PV's role could be a verifiable PROTOWN role.

yeah most of roles are pro mafia, i wonder if mafia has a pro town role.
the only pro town role till now are PR apparently and PV's.. nero had the power to normalize 1 role so i doubt we have a cop yet. bb naives cop claim makes more sense.

In post 836, PeaceBringer wrote:
In post 834, Rail Tracer wrote:interesting.

i'm going to take a wild guess that all the town PRs in this game have negative utility associated with them (compulsive framer, "normaliser" what the fuck that means, daytalk enabler), which just makes me that much more curious as to how PV's role could be a verifiable PROTOWN role.
EXACTLY...

well most of them apparently .. this is what SK was hinting firsts posts.. and people suspecting her(me) is possible scum or real prs..

In post 837, PeregrineV wrote:
In post 834, Rail Tracer wrote:interesting.

i'm going to take a wild guess that all the town PRs in this game have negative utility associated with them (compulsive framer, "normaliser" what the fuck that means, daytalk enabler), which just makes me that much more curious as to how PV's role could be a verifiable PROTOWN role.
I never said that my role was verifiably protown.

I am town.

My role is confirmable, as there is tangible evidence my role exists.

My role otherwise has no utility, except what I as a player add.

Confirmable? how ?

In post 842, PeregrineV wrote:
In post 838, Rail Tracer wrote: who do you currently think is scum?
Leaning strongly on Peace being scum.

Still not seeing full-Ooba-town.

None of these people: MuM, Millitos, Dante, Shadow, DV, Rail

ooba is town.

In post 844, BBmolla wrote:Oh yeah active lurking, jokey attitude, general scummy behavior. He was the scum on your wagon.

Lurking i s not a scum tell.
mafia has double vote is unlikely.. almost impossible?

In post 846, BBmolla wrote:If someone framed or tailored someone else they need to claim now.

lmao mafia does this shit.. the convulsive one died... but i wonder if town has power to help scums.. like town framer what power do scums have?

In post 849, Luna Lovegood wrote:
In post 817, Mitillos wrote:Well, that promised confirmation from PereV would be nice.
If that happens, I'll be going back to my mnemonic vote. Otherwise, Pere it is.
What happens now?

In post 832, PeregrineV wrote:
In post 830, RadiantCowbells wrote:I got a guilty on Peacebringer last night >:(
A guilty as in he's scum, or guilty of some other crime?
Please don't believe that.

u cc cop claim?

In post 851, BBmolla wrote:I'm a naive cop with a guilty on RadiantCowbell, so she should be fairly confirmed town unless anyone claims to have framed her.

u just sliped? naive cop doesnt' know he is naive.. if he does he gets only innocents. i a taking this as a fke claim, or u scum and u don't know what u will claim.

In post 857, PeregrineV wrote:
In post 851, BBmolla wrote:I'm a naive cop with a guilty on RadiantCowbell, so she should be fairly confirmed town unless anyone claims to have framed her.

In post 854, BBmolla wrote:I guess there could be a Sanity Switcher that gives me an alternate result or some bullshit.
Naive means always gets innocent regardless of actual alignment.

How can you, as a naive cop, get a guilty at all?

this..

In post 856, DeasVail wrote:
In post 830, RadiantCowbells wrote:I got a guilty on Peacebringer last night >:(
Can you clarify the truthfulness of this? I mean, your lack of vote makes me struggle to take this seriously, but others seem to think it possible you're serious.

I'm thinking of having PV fullclaim
, especially since it's unlikely we'll ever be able to confirm him. What do you all think?

BBmolla, tell me to stop asking questions and I will, but otherwise I am confused.

Agreed.

Diabolik · Post Post #864 (ISO) » Mon Sep 23, 2013 12:51 pm

@BB
wtf.. so it a legit claim??
i guess if u were normalized u would have become cop?
meaning radian is prob paranoid cop?
i bet nero normalized some scum

any town was normalized?

Diabolik · Post Post #865 (ISO) » Mon Sep 23, 2013 12:53 pm

@BB
SInce most of us have negatives Pr, don't u think its possible MUM is a confirmed double voter as clear? OR u think mafia has town pr and town has mafia pr? like town framer and similar things?
If mafia has a double voter there should be no more than 3 mafia.

DeasVail · Post Post #866 (ISO) » Mon Sep 23, 2013 12:53 pm

In post 862, BBmolla wrote:It says my result will always be innocent.

But I have a guilty on RadiantCowbells.

@mod: If a framer framed someone, and a naive cop investigated that player, what would happen?

To be honest, I thought it might have been some weird gambit.

In that case, my best explanation currently is that you were targeted by neroandmollie and are now a sane cop (especially since we've already had a framer flip and more than one framer in a setup is a bit..

). This might be wishful thinking on my part, but in my opinion RadiantCowbells is scummy anyway, so let's just lynch him?

PEdit: Aw, beaten to it.

DeasVail · Post Post #867 (ISO) » Mon Sep 23, 2013 12:56 pm

Also, just so you all know, I'm pretty sure my role is useless, but apart from that it doesn't have anything negative to it.

Diabolik · Post Post #868 (ISO) » Mon Sep 23, 2013 1:01 pm

In post 866, DeasVail wrote:
In post 862, BBmolla wrote:It says my result will always be innocent.

But I have a guilty on RadiantCowbells.

@mod: If a framer framed someone, and a naive cop investigated that player, what would happen?
To be honest, I thought it might have been some weird gambit.

In that case, my best explanation currently is that you were targeted by neroandmollie and are now a sane cop (especially since we've already had a framer flip and more than one framer in a setup is a bit.. ). This might be wishful thinking on my part, but in my opinion RadiantCowbells is scummy anyway, so let's just lynch him?

PEdit: Aw, beaten to it.

WTf this makes 100% sense .. more the fact radiant claims cop?

@n DOes the the normalized person knows if he has been normalized ?

In post 867, DeasVail wrote:Also, just so you all know, I'm pretty sure my role is useless, but apart from that it doesn't have anything negative to it.

Well mine isn't useful at all and has a negative side for town too..not that negative but like i said i am always late

i am going to vote rad if mod confirms bb might be normalized

BBmolla · Post Post #869 (ISO) » Mon Sep 23, 2013 1:02 pm

I wasn't informed of jack shit.

DeasVail · Post Post #870 (ISO) » Mon Sep 23, 2013 1:10 pm

In post 868, Diabolik wrote:more the fact radiant claims cop?

I'm taking this seriously for now, but it's not too important.

I also think there's a decent chance that BBmolla wouldn't be informed, but I'm not sure.

DeasVail · Post Post #871 (ISO) » Mon Sep 23, 2013 1:10 pm

*I'm not taking this seriously

Mitillos · Post Post #872 (ISO) » Mon Sep 23, 2013 1:38 pm

@DV: Do you mean he wouldn't be informed of a change in his role? See post 800, where nero's power was explained. It explicitly states that whoever gets changed gets informed.

DeasVail · Post Post #873 (ISO) » Mon Sep 23, 2013 2:25 pm

Oh, my bad. I missed that. Yeah, that isn't possible then.

Diabolik · Post Post #874 (ISO) » Mon Sep 23, 2013 2:51 pm

just too good to be true...
Obv nero normalized some scum

OR he normalized ooba? i got no pm.. i don't know what my normalized role would be... PV hard claiming?
SOmeone can confirm the networker?
There should be some town QT or he is scum networker.