VOTE: CDL
Yo mister.
In post 27, Kazekirimaru wrote:Not sure how to feel about miller claim.
Seen it legit before; seen it used as a scum gambit before.
Parrrdon?
Not super impressed by notscience. No, not good. Actually really bad scummy.
UNVOTE: VOTE: notscience Whole we're at it:
In post 56, notscience wrote:So, reads thus far
CDB Town because he really did a nice job getting us out of RVS and he's been p transparent thus far, and I liked his miller reaction
Aero Scum for sheeping and running someone up to L-1 before everyone has even checked in, let alone on page 2.
Brian probs scum for reasons CDB has said, but by no means should get lynched before everyone's even checked in.
Aero scum for voting Brian L-1/Brian probs scum? Really? CDB/notscience doesn't look like buddies (notscience buddying though? Yea verily could be, as they say), not that that means much at this stage, but still. I initially read CDB's posts in the wake of the Miller claim as showily badgering people about their reactions, but whatever.
That said, everyone including YYR who reads this as a dichotomy between legit Miller/scum who got antsy at a Page 1 wagon . . . what? Seriously? SpyreX, what, no. Durrr. CDB is absolutely correct that if it's a scum gambit, it was planned as his entry post.
In post 60, Brian Skies wrote:@aeronaut: The difference is that notscience made the vote after clearly participating in the discussion. You made your vote upon your entrance.
That's why I'm far more suspicious of notscience than Aero, to be honest.
In post 63, Smudger wrote:Not at all, my last name is Smith, therefore the nickname Smudger, which is a general nick name given to Smiths in the British armed forces, and my wife's last name is Miller... Why so serious so early off the bat Channel?
As for a Miller in this game, well have never played in a game with one, question is it a miller or is it another PR with a win condition that means it must lynch?
...
I sincerely hope you're joking. The fact that you said that is pretty much the only thing keeping me from voting you, and I feel dirty saying that.
In post 70, Kazekirimaru wrote:You do realize there is barely any pressure on you at all, right? Why are you defending so hard?
Finally, an emoticon for all my needs.
Three acceptances of he Miller claim as legit in a row. Huh. Personally am of the Llamafluff school of first-post Miller claims, and there are a good few I'd lynch before Brian on scumminess merit.
Smudger #95 is just badnews all around. The weakest stab at notscience followed by jumping onto notscience's Aero wagon followed by the weakest 'doubt your claim/am taking the opinions that it's legit into account/I literally have not said anything stronger about the Miller claim all game tralala' NOPE.
In post 145, YYR wrote:Vote: Kaze
What exactly changed your mind here? Since you last responded to me, you still seemed unsure of your position on Brian. And he hasn't done anything as far as I can see that could possibly change your mind. The only thing I did see was two other townies solidify their read on Brian as town, and this looks like you're just following them along.
(Kaz's is by far the shadiest verbal expression of belief in Brian's Miller claim here).
First thing I've seen that reads townish instead of scummish? But Garmr's Town regardless.
VOTE: Kaz