Not Voting - 1 (ffullisade)
Day Seven's deadline is Monday, September 30th, @ 12:30 PM PST, which is in (expired on 2013-09-30 12:30:00).
Yeah, I have a response to this spec in my ISO too:In post 6215, penguin_alien wrote: This is in my ISO. But again, ThAd-Vig says he's shooting blue CTD. He instead uses a shot that is absorbed by protection on you. That same night, Rena says she is blocked. WHY would blue scum risk losing half their remaining team to ThAd's shot if they could prevent it? Why not block him and NK Rena if they thought she might witness the block?
Then, when ThAd's claimed actions the next day indicate he might shoot unpredictably, then he's blocked. So:
--A blue RB would have blocked him the third (first) night
--A town RB wouldn't have blocked him at all, or blocked Rena
--A red roleblocker...yeah, it fits. Even if we pretend you're not red, it's obvious that the roleblocker was happy to let the vig shoot when they thought he was pledged to hit someone the knew about and wasn't them, not so much when they couldn't predict his shot.
I've laid this out more than once now. Please don't pretend like I'm taking flights of fancy here.
Again, it's WIFOM, just like your other points. Balance-wise it doesn't make sense for red team to have 3PRs, and strong ones at that, while the blue team only has 2.In post 6138, Bulbazak wrote: Maybe you thought that ThAd wouldn't shoot CTD after everything that happened. Maybe you thought CTD would be protected, since I was pushing for that. How am I supposed to know? I'm more curious about why Rena was blocked, since that would suggest a ThAd kill, but yet ThAd was left alive.
Which post are you intentionally not following up? The ones I'd like you to answer or address are these:In post 6219, ffullisade wrote:I've intentionally not followed up on one post addressed to me. I don't recall anything else you posted to me recently.In post 6210, Bulbazak wrote:Ffullisade, you are not addressing any of my posts to you. I'd like you to rectify that please.
In post 6138, Bulbazak wrote:Um...what? I think I got lost somewhere in the middle. Can you break this down for me in simpler terms?In post 6136, ffullisade wrote:I think bulba's a role blocker. I think PA knows it. because of her team - maybe her - getting blocked last night.
Where nacho fits in is less clear to me. But if I'm right about bulba role blocking and Nacho is right about 1 red scum, assuming we mislynch town today, then one townie will die tonight and tomorrow will be 2-1-1. And the game is unwinnable for town even if we lynch scum tomorrow.
If there are 2 reds, then it's possible that it will be a scum who dies tonight and then it will still be 2-1-1 tomorrow and unwinnable unless they shoot each other tonight. And if there is a roleblock two shots won't happen.
If we have 1 red, then Nacho probably isn't it.
I feel like we have to lynch between bulba and PA today and hope for the best.
PA's vote on bulba supports this scenario, I think.
Did you ever follow up on this:In post 6146, Bulbazak wrote:I think I got lost somewhere around the second paragraph. Can you rephrase your post?In post 6143, ffullisade wrote:Where did the post stop making sense?
I remember waiting for your post and nothing coming. Was it just a simple "X is red and Y is blue", because I was expecting something bigger? Regardless, we're getting close to deadline and we really need to get this right and lynch red today, so I'd like to know your thoughts. You know mine.In post 6087, ffullisade wrote:I'll post what we're thinking tomorrow.
That's what I decided not to follow up. It's obsolete based on what I think is an improved understanding of how the game could be balanced. I see nothing but walls ahead and I'm not interested in helping produce another huge ball of tangled semantic yarn.In post 6251, Bulbazak wrote:Which post are you intentionally not following up? The ones I'd like you to answer or address are these:In post 6219, ffullisade wrote:I've intentionally not followed up on one post addressed to me. I don't recall anything else you posted to me recently.In post 6210, Bulbazak wrote:Ffullisade, you are not addressing any of my posts to you. I'd like you to rectify that please.
In post 6138, Bulbazak wrote:Um...what? I think I got lost somewhere in the middle. Can you break this down for me in simpler terms?In post 6136, ffullisade wrote:I think bulba's a role blocker. I think PA knows it. because of her team - maybe her - getting blocked last night.
Where nacho fits in is less clear to me. But if I'm right about bulba role blocking and Nacho is right about 1 red scum, assuming we mislynch town today, then one townie will die tonight and tomorrow will be 2-1-1. And the game is unwinnable for town even if we lynch scum tomorrow.
If there are 2 reds, then it's possible that it will be a scum who dies tonight and then it will still be 2-1-1 tomorrow and unwinnable unless they shoot each other tonight. And if there is a roleblock two shots won't happen.
If we have 1 red, then Nacho probably isn't it.
I feel like we have to lynch between bulba and PA today and hope for the best.
PA's vote on bulba supports this scenario, I think.In post 6146, Bulbazak wrote:I think I got lost somewhere around the second paragraph. Can you rephrase your post?In post 6143, ffullisade wrote:Where did the post stop making sense?
Did I? Seriously?Did you ever follow up on this:
In post 6087, ffullisade wrote:I'll post what we're thinking tomorrow.
I'm speechless.I remember waiting for your post and nothing coming. Was it just a simple "X is red and Y is blue", because I was expecting something bigger? Regardless, we're getting close to deadline and we really need to get this right and lynch red today, so I'd like to know your thoughts. You know mine.
bulba i can't believe i ever saved youIn post 6251, Bulbazak wrote:I'd like to know your thoughts. You know mine.
I guess I was expecting something a little bit more in-depth thought-wise. I was expecting you to give a breakdown of what your thought process was, why you had X or Y as scum, etc., all of which would be helpful since we are in Mylo. And yes, I'll continue to believe that we ARE in Mylo without any evidence to the contrary. That's why I believe it's very important to lynch red scum, because I'd rather not rely on crosskills to do that for us. As of right now, I still don't quite understand your reasoning behind your reads, except that Nacho is town because he's thinking what you are which is A.) Not a town tell (especially not in Mylo/Lylo) and B.) easily faked if said player has any experience (As I said, I could have faked that, and Nacho is better than I am.). You can roll your eyes or do what you want to, but this is not the time to be opaque. Now I've shared my thoughts and reads on the game state and have actually stated reasons for them, and, surprise surprise, all of the scum are on my wagon. We have less then 24 hrs. to lynch red, and I would like you to at least try to help us find and lynch red scum today. If you can't do that, then you can always hammer me and hope for the cross kills.In post 6252, ffullisade wrote:Did I? Seriously?Did you ever follow up on this:
In post 6087, ffullisade wrote:I'll post what we're thinking tomorrow.
My next post was a complete shake-up of my stance on the game state, and everything I've posted since then has been informed by that shake up.
I'm speechless.I remember waiting for your post and nothing coming. Was it just a simple "X is red and Y is blue", because I was expecting something bigger? Regardless, we're getting close to deadline and we really need to get this right and lynch red today, so I'd like to know your thoughts. You know mine.
But wasn't this the entire point? To save me for the final mislynch?In post 6253, Nachomamma8 wrote:bulba i can't believe i ever saved youIn post 6251, Bulbazak wrote:I'd like to know your thoughts. You know mine.
In post 6254, Bulbazak wrote:But wasn't this the entire point? To save me for the final mislynch?
You need 2 of Ffullisade, Mara and penguin to vote Nacho instead of you.In post 6265, Bulbazak wrote:I'd like to hear from Ffullisade before I go to bed within the next few hours. There's no guarantee that I'll be around before deadline, and I want to talk things out. I also wouldn't mind talking to PV as well. We really need to discuss what we're going to do, because red team essentially has this day in a stranglehold.
The motive would be for town to not believe they're in Mylo and thus become more lax in their decision making process. If successful, town's mindset would no longer be "We need to lynch red scum or we lose.", but would be "There's only 2 scum left and of different factions. It doesn't matter which one we hit, and if we mislynch, we still have another day." The difference is night and day. All Nacho has to do is get us to not lynch red scum, and his team essentially wins.In post 6266, penguin_alien wrote: Bulbazak and PV, if Nacho is red scum, what's his motive for floating a theory and apparently standing behind it that red scum is a three-man team and so is down to one member? He's not using it as an excuse to hunt blue scum instead of red from what I can tell.
When it starts coming down to math, you want town to miscalculate.In post 6266, penguin_alien wrote:UNVOTE: Bulbazak
For now. I'll be around in the morning, but I'm wavering a bit here. It is true that even if Seanald wouldn't have been that day's lynch without Nacho turning the wagon, but as a claimed neighbor his days were likely numbered.
Bulbazak and PV, if Nacho is red scum, what's his motive for floating a theory and apparently standing behind it that red scum is a three-man team and so is down to one member? He's not using it as an excuse to hunt blue scum instead of red from what I can tell.
In post 3709, PeregrineV wrote:Since LOL Mafia just finished, and it featured a scumteam of Cephrir and Nachomamma, I would like to hear a detailed analysis by each of them on the other person, especially comparing their play here to their scum play in LoL.
In post 3710, Cephrir wrote:I can probably do that at some point. Honestly, I've thought this whole game that part of the reason Nacho's townreading me when most people aren't is because I'm playing totally differently (and worse) from that game.In post 3709, PeregrineV wrote:Since LOL Mafia just finished, and it featured a scumteam of Cephrir and Nachomamma, I would like to hear a detailed analysis by each of them on the other person, especially comparing their play here to their scum play in LoL.
In post 3746, Nachomamma8 wrote:Yup. Your read changes in particular that game were opportunistic as hell, whereas here you end up waffling, you express being unsure a LOT more in thread, everything feels more natural here. But if PV wants to hear a "detailed analysis", then he's going to have to actually put some effort into the game.In post 3710, Cephrir wrote:I can probably do that at some point. Honestly, I've thought this whole game that part of the reason Nacho's townreading me when most people aren't is because I'm playing totally differently (and worse) from that game.
In post 3996, Nachomamma8 wrote:I didn't. I'm not necessarily completely complying with it, but I didn't ignore it.
In post 4022, PeregrineV wrote:Based on 3746, you think Cephrir is town?In post 3996, Nachomamma8 wrote:I didn't. I'm not necessarily completely complying with it, but I didn't ignore it.Because I was looking for something a little more comprehensive, likeIn post 3996, Nachomamma8 wrote:Yup. Your read changes in particular that game were opportunistic as hell, whereas here you end up waffling, you express being unsure a LOT more in thread, everything feels more natural here. But if PV wants to hear a "detailed analysis", then he's going to have to actually put some effort into the game.In post 3329, Nachomamma8 wrote:tl;dr When Arc is town, she OMGUSes hard because she's used to scum attacking her for so long. She will also pick out people who have been easy targets, people who she feels like she can defend, and she will defend them from a position of authority (since she knows certain people will read her as town and she can hammer the hell out of them if they attack her). She's lighter as town because it's what she excels at, hence the occasional teasing with the people she interacts with. Her stronger, more aggressive posts are the ones she makes from that position of authority; she doesn't have it as scum and that's her strongest meta point.
Find me something stronger that says REDSCUM and we'll talk about moving my vote.In post 4079, Nachomamma8 wrote:I'm not that familiar with Cephrir's meta.In post 4022, PeregrineV wrote:Because I was looking for something a little more comprehensive, like
Nacho?In post 6270, PeregrineV wrote:When it starts coming down to math, you want town to miscalculate.In post 6266, penguin_alien wrote:UNVOTE: Bulbazak
For now. I'll be around in the morning, but I'm wavering a bit here. It is true that even if Seanald wouldn't have been that day's lynch without Nacho turning the wagon, but as a claimed neighbor his days were likely numbered.
Bulbazak and PV, if Nacho is red scum, what's his motive for floating a theory and apparently standing behind it that red scum is a three-man team and so is down to one member? He's not using it as an excuse to hunt blue scum instead of red from what I can tell.
But, if Nacho is not redscum, then who is?
One of the things I never shook was this set of exchanges, especially after Ceph flipped redscum.
In post 3709, PeregrineV wrote:Since LOL Mafia just finished, and it featured a scumteam of Cephrir and Nachomamma, I would like to hear a detailed analysis by each of them on the other person, especially comparing their play here to their scum play in LoL.In post 3710, Cephrir wrote:I can probably do that at some point. Honestly, I've thought this whole game that part of the reason Nacho's townreading me when most people aren't is because I'm playing totally differently (and worse) from that game.In post 3709, PeregrineV wrote:Since LOL Mafia just finished, and it featured a scumteam of Cephrir and Nachomamma, I would like to hear a detailed analysis by each of them on the other person, especially comparing their play here to their scum play in LoL.In post 3746, Nachomamma8 wrote:Yup. Your read changes in particular that game were opportunistic as hell, whereas here you end up waffling, you express being unsure a LOT more in thread, everything feels more natural here. But if PV wants to hear a "detailed analysis", then he's going to have to actually put some effort into the game.In post 3710, Cephrir wrote:I can probably do that at some point. Honestly, I've thought this whole game that part of the reason Nacho's townreading me when most people aren't is because I'm playing totally differently (and worse) from that game.In post 3996, Nachomamma8 wrote:I didn't. I'm not necessarily completely complying with it, but I didn't ignore it.In post 4022, PeregrineV wrote:Based on 3746, you think Cephrir is town?In post 3996, Nachomamma8 wrote:I didn't. I'm not necessarily completely complying with it, but I didn't ignore it.Because I was looking for something a little more comprehensive, likeIn post 3996, Nachomamma8 wrote:Yup. Your read changes in particular that game were opportunistic as hell, whereas here you end up waffling, you express being unsure a LOT more in thread, everything feels more natural here. But if PV wants to hear a "detailed analysis", then he's going to have to actually put some effort into the game.In post 3329, Nachomamma8 wrote:tl;dr When Arc is town, she OMGUSes hard because she's used to scum attacking her for so long. She will also pick out people who have been easy targets, people who she feels like she can defend, and she will defend them from a position of authority (since she knows certain people will read her as town and she can hammer the hell out of them if they attack her). She's lighter as town because it's what she excels at, hence the occasional teasing with the people she interacts with. Her stronger, more aggressive posts are the ones she makes from that position of authority; she doesn't have it as scum and that's her strongest meta point.Find me something stronger that says REDSCUM and we'll talk about moving my vote.In post 4079, Nachomamma8 wrote:I'm not that familiar with Cephrir's meta.In post 4022, PeregrineV wrote:Because I was looking for something a little more comprehensive, like