Feirei is V/LA on weekends forever.
I do not know what VOTE: night means.
Hey who,Who wrote:I haven't voted yet, I would vote Aptil but don't want a quickhammer.
That means i want a no lynch today and go to night .The other site where i played mafia we can vote to go to night . So UNVOTE: .In post 950, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:
Mod Notes:
Feirei is V/LA on weekends forever.
I do not know what VOTE: night means.
aptilIn post 954, aptil wrote:That means i want a no lynch today and go to night .The other site where i played mafia we can vote to go to night . So UNVOTE: .
This is what i asked WHO about the vote on me , he has not answered . I would have taken this further but other actions in the last page have distracted me .In post 899, aptil wrote:What do you find scummy about it?In post 898, Who wrote:I am really bad at replacing in.
Why is everyone attacking aptil solely on Bald's interaction and not on what he has done?
I don't see Aptil as scum because of Bald but I do see Aptil as scum now that I have bothered to go and read his ISO.
1 of the most important skill a town player can develope is discerning the difference between town flail and scum flail. I think I wind up saying this in every other game.
^and this. the game was stalled cos we were waiting for a hammer on aptil and every1 to say who they were going to taget for night actions in the event the game wasn't over. I could be wrong, but who contributed to neither of those things (hammer obviously) and yet now finds aptil scummy enough to vote when aptil is actually starting to town tell a bit.In post 962, Feirei wrote:Read helium's 952.
Plus I believe eagle intentionally distanced aptil to plant an easy mislynch. It might be the fact that I feel like shit that drew this assumption, but as of now, I don't think aptil will flip scum.
Plus Who's vote feels opportunistic.
I don't see two the 2 are mutually exclusive when a player is obviously struggling in a game.In post 965, Daniel Bryan wrote:Asking why a game is stalled is town motivated. Not doing anything about it isnt.
Who, what danger was there before?? This is distinctly shifty sounding.
Lynch correctly tomorrow please. Get aptil. And the people who might be killing roles should target aptil tonight.In post 973, Daniel Bryan wrote: And why vote NO LYNCH when we CAN MISLYNCH