I wanted to look back at who was lynching Thor almost entirely for being a Miller. Turns out that was just Benmage and SafetyDance. It occurs to me that I let someone talk me out of suspecting Benmage yesterday because of like one game of meta. That actually really isn't sufficient and I don't know why I let that sway me. Policy lynching millers on sight is preposterous, it doesn't even matter that much. There are a million and a half other possible cop targets. The whole refusal to be even slightly remorseful today thing rubs me the wrong way, though on the other hand it always does and I'm often wrong on that point. Still, he should still be in my lynchpool and I don't know why I let him escape it.
In post 1898, Messiah Complex wrote:
In post 1872, Shadoweh wrote:##Vote: Alfred
I need you to answer one question for me, who are you?
You know, I'd be madder about Thor's wagon because of the miller thing etc, except uhm. Did no one notice that he kind of.. lied about who he was? I'm not a Game of Thrones scolar but that didn't look like the King of the Seals did it? It was still a terrible wagon for other reasons but I don't think over the top posts about how dare a liar get lynched are going to find teh scums.
Amrun are you going to vote all the people voting you because you suck, because that's what your vote looks like and there's a long list if you want to catch them all.
Why did you vote Alfred and
then
ask him a seemingly innocuous question that likely isn't (as evidenced by the vote)?
The middle paragraph...putting aside the misunderstanding, what was your point here? Particularly the last sentence.
And the last paragraph is classic mudsling.
"Vote: Alfred, what's up with X?" is not okay, but "What's up with X? Vote: Alfred" is okay?
Trying to move things along isn't pointless, nor is continuing to not detect the whole sarcasm bit.
For a post that complains about mudslinging, that sure is exactly what you're doing.
In post 1898, Messiah Complex wrote: In post 1881, macmollie wrote:I am not as comfy as the rest of you people are with goat people's claim. it could very easily be a fake claim and by all means I don't think he should be allowed to skate. their start of the day post "oh I need to fleeeeeeps" kind of sounded like a bit like reverse cheerleading but not quite. hhhmmm....
who was it that said that displaced did not look scummy was it alfred
sd, syrlacious was kidnapped/silenced/abducted by aliens or something I am leaning probably town
VOTE: garruck
I don't think Goat's information is alignment relevant. Who appears to be letting them skate by on their "claim?"
@ Nautilius: I would expect a scum JOAT to at least pretend to want to hold on to the fruit for a chance to confirm himself as town later in the game. Sending it N1 is like a giant middle finger with an "I'M TOWN, ASSHOLE" banner attached.
- Des
Rather than using it to "confirm himself as town" (which it does not do in any way) early in the game? I don't even understand what could possibly make you think the fruit is alignment indicative at all, never mind so strongly.
In post 1899, Benmage wrote: In post 1886, AGar wrote:Benmage, why are you not in here pontificating about how amazing you are right now owning that massive fuckup of a clear and obvious mislynch?
That lynch was a clear success. Get better.
This is what I was referring to above. You're allowed to be smarmy and even go for the "he deserved it" angle but this is really excessive.
In post 1895, Garruk Relentless wrote:Elle is still on our suspect lists, but, truthfully, Elle jumped into that whole Thor/Benmage/whatever mess and I lost track(if you missed the implications yesterday that we weren't really reading their posts, at the very least I wasn't). We did briefly talk about her in our discussion, but it was just a little blip(we actually went down the whole player list, but didn't have much to say for most) and I figured our stance was already established.
In a word, you can call our read on her decayed. I still find the wight slip suspect, but have decided to shelve it until further evidence exists. On a tangential note, I do like Elle's entrance today.
As a side-note, were going to be a bit more active today hopefully. The whole Thor/Benmage/macmollie thing yesterday got me in a slump and both heads here agreed to lurk it out. At this exact moment, I'm doing what I do best--parsing flavor and setup info. I skipped the miller conversation yesterday because I thought Thor was town and I attribute Faraday enough skill to try to WIFOM his setups, but now I have actual puzzle pieces to work with(and will have one more important one after the lynch).
A curious note: you phrased that post oddly, ooba...hmm...I need to relook at this game with a blank slate.
This entire post is garbage. You're still scumreading elle even though you haven't read, you know, 60% of her posts? Because that makes sense. Are you really going on about the wight bullshit still? It's not basically-RVS anymore. Last sentence here is awkward as hell, and this is coming from the king of awkward phrasing.
In post 1882, Garruk Relentless wrote:
And yes the flashwagon against us yesterday was largely unsubstantiated, but we've already addressed that yesterday.
Just because the reasons don't come along with the vote doesn't mean they don't exist. Did you think we were voting you for fun?
) but, I was just referencing that for the lurking argument. Il have to look back at the last times I saw her as scum to see if she does that vote thing as scum. I was pretty convinced she was scum the first day of that game and she wasn't, so I'm not really confident in my ability to read her.
