Newbie 1436 ~ Game Over

[fferyllt]

I have my ns quote stripes from yesterday still in my drafts I think. If I do, I'll go ahead and post them.

[fferyllt]

I forgot that I switched to post links instead of quote stripes. NotSci usually doesn't quote what he's replying to, and I found that quote stripes weren't showing his trajectory very well.


--------------------
Looking at NotSci's trajectory.

Wow, TSO Sakura scumteam.

That was easy.

Earlier he'd called an agi/grav but that was in the very early part of day 1.

In 129, 146, 176 he pressures Cabd and to a lesser extent me to vote TSO.

In 178 he advances the idea that you can't (effectively?) ask questions without the pressure of a vote behind the questions. 180 "your vote is useless".

Then he votes cabd in 184 for not voting. 187 failure to use vote is scummy.

Then there's talk of 1v1 and he calls TSO scumbuddies with Cabd.

213 is kind of a kitchen sink. Agreeing with NS' earlier reads on TSO and Sakura is now scummy, plus derides Cabd's "You've seen my scumgame" defense. However, I actually agree that it's a shitty defense coming from Cabd.

286 he points me at sakura. 364 "acceptable lynches" are TSO, Cabd, Sakura.

447 tries to herd votes back onto Cabd.

Going to summarize. He declares intent to hammer TSO (multiple times) while still trying to get more traction on the Cabd wagon.

Then in 775 he votes cabd because he won't be around to change off TSO if there's a claim. TSO had already declined to claim in 567

That post by TSO wasn't the reason I had him in my town pile but it was actually a pretty good indication he was town.

[Cabd]

However, I actually agree that it's a shitty defense coming from Cabd.

Is there even such a thing you'd consider NOT a shitty defense coming from me?

* crickets *

Didn't think so.

[Cabd]

Otoh there's also no such thing as a reason NOT to troll ns.

[fferyllt]

However, I actually agree that it's a shitty defense coming from Cabd.

Is there even such a thing you'd consider NOT a shitty defense coming from me?

* crickets *

Didn't think so.

That one was an epic contradiction.

[fferyllt]

Otoh there's also no such thing as a reason NOT to troll ns.

At least you didn't talk him into reading a long-ass and mostly irrelevant game thread. :/

[Cabd]

Otoh there's also no such thing as a reason NOT to troll ns.

At least you didn't talk him into reading a long-ass and mostly irrelevant game thread. :/

I know!

Hey at least now you have meta on my female half.

[notscience]

Otoh there's also no such thing as a reason NOT to troll ns.

At least you didn't talk him into reading a long-ass and mostly irrelevant game thread. :/

I know!

Hey at least now you have meta on my female half.

wat

[Cabd]

My girlfriend plays mafia and was in that game with bert.

[notscience]

Ah, that explains it.

[Bert]

My girlfriend plays mafia and was in that game with bert.

Didn't you follow Mini 1489 too, which had Nacho/Tammy/Empire/me/Mara? You follow a lot of games...lol

Cuz that's probably a good measure of my town game, and I wasn't obvtown in that game either

[Bert]

My girlfriend plays mafia and was in that game with bert.

I wish Lynx were here to give input, she was good...that's why she died N1

[Cabd]

My girlfriend plays mafia and was in that game with bert.

Didn't you follow Mini 1489 too, which had Nacho/Tammy/Empire/me/Mara? You follow a lot of games...lol

Cuz that's probably a good measure of my town game, and I wasn't obvtown in that game either

I did! Watching you all flail around as mara sat there claiming scum over and over was quite amusing, at that.

[Bert]

I forgot that I switched to post links instead of quote stripes. NotSci usually doesn't quote what he's replying to, and I found that quote stripes weren't showing his trajectory very well.

So....before I go read your analysis of notscience, do you think he's scum, or leaning scum?

Is there even such a thing you'd consider NOT a shitty defense coming from me?

* crickets *

Didn't think so.

Why does Ffery always consider your defenses shitty?

[fferyllt]

So....before I go read your analysis of notscience, do you think he's scum, or leaning scum?

It's a gut-based worry. Objectively his posts don't scream scum. But, I know he'll tunnel the crap out of players as scum as well as town.

[Cabd]

Why does Ffery always consider your defenses shitty?

If paranoia was edible her paranoia over every word I type could end word hunger overnight.

[Bert]

It's a gut-based worry. Objectively his posts don't scream scum. But, I know he'll tunnel the crap out of players as scum as well as town.

Yeah, I agree. It's very much transferable to either alignment, so he's hard to read in that regard.

Hmm...I think I'm gonna grab some popcorn and watch this scumbag squirm.

Vote: notscience

Die.

[notscience]

I lol'd

[Bert]

EBWOP: @ffery, your 775 link is messed up.

@notscience: what say you to ffery's case?

[notscience]

I forgot that I switched to post links instead of quote stripes. NotSci usually doesn't quote what he's replying to, and I found that quote stripes weren't showing his trajectory very well.


--------------------
Looking at NotSci's trajectory.

Wow, TSO Sakura scumteam.

That was easy.

Earlier he'd called an agi/grav but that was in the very early part of day 1.

In 129, 146, 176 he pressures Cabd and to a lesser extent me to vote TSO.

In 178 he advances the idea that you can't (effectively?) ask questions without the pressure of a vote behind the questions. 180 "your vote is useless".

Then he votes cabd in 184 for not voting. 187 failure to use vote is scummy.

Then there's talk of 1v1 and he calls TSO scumbuddies with Cabd.

213 is kind of a kitchen sink. Agreeing with NS' earlier reads on TSO and Sakura is now scummy, plus derides Cabd's "You've seen my scumgame" defense. However, I actually agree that it's a shitty defense coming from Cabd.

286 he points me at sakura. 364 "acceptable lynches" are TSO, Cabd, Sakura.

447 tries to herd votes back onto Cabd.

Going to summarize. He declares intent to hammer TSO (multiple times) while still trying to get more traction on the Cabd wagon.

Then in 775 he votes cabd because he won't be around to change off TSO if there's a claim. TSO had already declined to claim in 567

That post by TSO wasn't the reason I had him in my town pile but it was actually a pretty good indication he was town.

There is literally 0 actual case here lol.

The only thing close is me not hammering someone who didn't claim.

[fferyllt]

I started working on a case for notsci-scum yesterday.

I talked myself out of it.

bert I don't think I have a case. Not from what's in the thread so far.

This may piss Kaze off, but I'm going to meta notsci.

[notscience]

I'm going to meta notsci.

Have fun with that

[Bert]

Doesn't matter what Kaze thinks about meta. <3 Just do your own thing!

[Cabd]

I actually dislike the very thought that we should discount one or many methods of scumhunting because player X or player Y do not enjoy using them.

[notscience]

I actually dislike the very thought that we should discount one or many methods of scumhunting because player X or player Y do not enjoy using them.

IAWTP