Spoiler: >.>
In post 229, Mr. Flay wrote:You're right, that's the simple explanation. But it also could indicate that you knew no scum were in that group. Cases are built on such small things.In post 222, pitoli wrote:If the "slip" is about me calling the players on Fear's list "town" then I think that's slightly ridiculous.
It should have been obvious that I wasn't calling their alignment, I was using town in the sense of "this game's group of players".
UNVOTE: Xiao Long However right now I much prefer to VOTE: JerryArr. Xiao has been much more plugged-in in the last page or so, and answering questions without the snippiness and has good responses to (most) suspicions. Jerry on the other hand is voting for pressure with 6 days left. WTF??
In post 34, Mr. Flay wrote:Sorry, quick post this morning before I fall into a coding pit. Will try to come back this evening/afternoon with more, as things are ramping up.
By my count we have everyone posting except for rmpeacoc, who is an SE and has confirmed and should know better. MAYBE she's gone for the weekend... butFOS: rmpeacocjust to encourage the posting.
I like jon_h61 so far. Fear is trying too hard, but that might be a null tell based on personality. JerryArr's love for No Lynch seems to be born of ignorance, not malice.
However I'm not liking Xiao Long's minimalist posting so far, combined with the limited access. If you're only going to be able to post every two days, you have to make those posts COUNT. "k" does not count, FYI. "Depends on the situation" does not count. Expand. Ask some questions of your own. Or become a piñata. VOTE: Xiao Long
In post 557, Mr. Flay wrote:Welp. VOTE: jon_h61 for reasons already stated. He was around yesterday but didn't post.
In post 588, Mr. Flay wrote:Oh CHRIST. I just figured out why nqt was obsessed with hypotheticals. I'm an idiot.
VOTE: notquitethere - die Roleblocking scum.
VOTE: Flay