we have over a week as of this post...In post 99, Fart Bane wrote:We're getting dangerously close to the deadline...
Perhaps I could post some reads if you guys like.
But certainly that doesn't mean we need to take up all of the allotted time.
we have over a week as of this post...In post 99, Fart Bane wrote:We're getting dangerously close to the deadline...
Perhaps I could post some reads if you guys like.
1) I didn't say it was my opinion, but I do not ONCE remember you asking that in either of the games we have played (where you were town in both).In post 81, Mr. Flay wrote:I don't think you understand what I mean by 'vote cases' I mean a reason to vote. Any reason, even a small one, is good Day One. But sitting back and going "hurr I'm waiting for something to happen" is not good for the game. Random voting is not good for the game past the first couple of posts (and not really good there, but it does minimal harm). Jerry's (who was scum in 1397) pressure voting close to deadline was a reason to vote him. Minimalist and uncooperative posting by Xiao Long was a reason to vote him. A case doesn't have to be a wallpost, especially in the early game.
So why are you pushing a wagon onto me for basically saying to do what I'm doing? Also "here where the votes are on him" is a big misrep when you're onto the second vote on me. Some people are questioning what I was doing with the wagon on jmo16mla, but only Number One had voted until you did. And for somebody who wants me to back up my 'vote cases' dictum, you haven't done much to build yours.
Let's dance. VOTE: notscience
Well, I mean don't strain yourself, but it would be helpful...In post 99, Fart Bane wrote:We're getting dangerously close to the deadline...
Perhaps I could post some reads if you guys like.
I'm pretty sure I don't have any tells that blatant... I'm a case-based player, not gut-based, like I said. That works for me as scum or town.In post 103, notscience wrote:3) Are you saying that if you don't explicitly state your reasoning in a vote then you're scum?
Yes. Unless it's me being attacked... Or if I feel I've caught scum.In post 95, Mr. Flay wrote:Really? What you actually said in post 57 was "I disagree Number. I see Flay's Attack on jmo being null." Since it's the only thing you've commented on about me, how is that not a read of me? in fact your response to this whole wagon thing has been remarkably subdued. Are you always this laid back?In post 83, The Acting Method wrote:Correction: I say that I see you're reaction as null. Not that I read you as null.In post 81, Mr. Flay wrote: [*]TAMI basically view the same way. He says I'm a null read, but really isn't pushing to get any more information or advance his own case. He's posting theory and playstyle tips, not analysis.
This is kind of what happened to me. I told myself I would straighten that out before the weekend was up. That begins... now.In post 11, Mr. Flay wrote:While there is an every-72-hours minimum, Istronglyencourage everyone to post every 24 hours at least. It makes it much easier to keep up with the game and not get stuck in an "I need to read up before I can participate" loop.
How is it that you had time to link this page, but didn't have time to actually look at it and check to see if EBWOP was on the page?In post 17, Mr. Flay wrote:EBWOP is (or should be) in the Abbreviations page on the wiki. Editing By Way Of Posting, since you can't edit your words in Mafia game threads.
I saw the "eats and sleeps" comment as more of a statement telling Fart Bane to stop using the fact that Mr. Flay is a site administrator to express(/feign?) fear of you, and get down to playing as if you are a normal player, because technically, you are. Fart Bane basically confirms as much in post 43.In post 41, Mr. Flay wrote:I'm fine with that for now, unless a better candidate presents themselves.In post 39, jmo16mla wrote:mod, not science is also voting me,
Flay, your vote has put me at L-1 on page two. No one vote me. Kthanks.
I think the "he eats and sleeps like anyone else" also can serve to belittle me. If you're town it's fine, but if you're not it could be a way to put off any argument I make that you don't like.
What would you have done instead, if the RQS instigator had basically given a vague non-answer when asked if they'd found any answers?In post 41, Mr. Flay wrote:Still, the biggest thing was trying to revert to RVS. That is not the mark of a strong player, particularly one who says they are good as town.
You know. Being town, and winning?
Actually, I'm not sure. I wasn't particularly getting a mafia feel from his posts, but on a re-read, I'm slightly less confident in that. His rapid multi posting style seems much less likely to come from mafia however, especially newbie mafia. I would think they would be much more careful, as The Acting Method is being. Not that TAM is new, just that he is scummy.
Look who's phone posting. lol
Well, I don't really trust meta as reasoning that often, for the following reasons:In post 101, Fart Bane wrote:To all except not science and flay:
What do you think of ns's attack on flay?