@Stupendos:
Took a look at your original case:Nacho has made opportunistic votes more than once. He voted me when his reasoning was "resorting" which is BS.
- Can't argue that there was no logic to back up this vote here. But the vote was not opportunistic. This would have been the third vote on you & both votes by Tammy and Messiah weren't fresh i.e. not a rising wagon.
Then he voted Thor without reasoning.
- He does present reasoning later when asked about it about Syryana. (i.e. he preferred a Thor lynch to mine - "ooba wagon sucks because ooba is town.")
Then he jumped on the SD wagon. Then he went back to Thor without saying anything.
- Deadline voting is neutral. SD vote and Thor vote were both very close to the deadline.
I feel like his attempts at scumhunting this game have been weak. There are a lot of simple questions like "Why?" that don't seem to be truly scumhunting.
- Cannot comment on the questioning style of scum hunting.
- For me, his D1 play was solid town. Currently, the most disconcerting part about Nat is that his posting levels have really tanked. So your 'lurking' argument has merit. (And I haven't read Walking Dead but backing off posting levels seems a bit silly). While I still feel confident enough to label as "weak town" read - I wish the earlier Nautilius would come back.
So yes - I won't be backing that lynch. However, if you do decide to pursue other wagons, I promise good things with a SpyreX lynch.
