![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
I remember having a strong townread on you there (or at least on the hydra).
I don't have that here, though.
If you feel like you're being lynched by town players, you can show frustration as town. But if you feel like your mislynch is driven by scum, then no. (Mae felt like her wagon was driven by scum.) You'll accept it, because you know your mislynch can be weaponized to find the scum.In post 340, Grimgroove wrote:Haven't read your entire case yet, but with the above I disagree 100%. In my experience town shows a lot more indignation over being lynched, because they know some people are mistaking by voting them. When you're telling the truth and nobody believes you, it's far more frustrating than when lying and nobody believing you.
Quite the opposite, I'm ecstatic. Because you're probably one of the only players here who can prevent your idiotic mislynch.In post 344, Ghostlin wrote:Hi. Those of you who know me are probably pissing and moaning that you had some really bad fucking luck to have me show up.
Oh? And what did you think I was talking about, then?In post 342, shos wrote:Just read the towncase, it sucks. Far from what i thought you talked about.
Didn't you attack me for doing the same thing? And you don't really need the huge text,In post 351, shos wrote:well then,, you should claim in the first of your posts. fully.Ghostlinthis is an intent to hammer.
Does not compute.In post 353, funkybike1 wrote:Not unvoting though.
If anyone hammers before Ghostlin can post, they will be the next lynch.
She's fine with being lynched by the quote I pointed out in which she admitted she was fine with being lynched.In post 352, mastin2 wrote:[quote="In post 337, Lord Mhork"how on earth is Mae fine with being lynched? She stopped showing up!
If you feel like you're being lynched by town players, you can show frustration as town. But if you feel like your mislynch is driven by scum, then no. (Mae felt like her wagon was driven by scum.) You'll accept it, because you know your mislynch can be weaponized to find the scum.In post 340, Grimgroove wrote:Haven't read your entire case yet, but with the above I disagree 100%. In my experience town shows a lot more indignation over being lynched, because they know some people are mistaking by voting them. When you're telling the truth and nobody believes you, it's far more frustrating than when lying and nobody believing you.
Quite the opposite, I'm ecstatic. Because you're probably one of the only players here who can prevent your idiotic mislynch.In post 344, Ghostlin wrote:Hi. Those of you who know me are probably pissing and moaning that you had some really bad fucking luck to have me show up.
Oh? And what did you think I was talking about, then?[/quote]In post 342, shos wrote:Just read the towncase, it sucks. Far from what i thought you talked about.
It's okay it was pretty bad having multiball in a micro.In post 350, Grimgroove wrote:Oh yeah. Sorry about that. I kind of try to forget about that game, if we can call it a game. Felt more like a play staged by HD![]()
I remember having a strong townread on you there (or at least on the hydra).
I don't have that here, though.
She's fine with being lynched by the quote I pointed out in which she admitted she was fine with being lynched.In post 352, mastin2 wrote:[quote="In post 337, Lord Mhork"how on earth is Mae fine with being lynched? She stopped showing up!
If you feel like you're being lynched by town players, you can show frustration as town. But if you feel like your mislynch is driven by scum, then no. (Mae felt like her wagon was driven by scum.) You'll accept it, because you know your mislynch can be weaponized to find the scum.In post 340, Grimgroove wrote:Haven't read your entire case yet, but with the above I disagree 100%. In my experience town shows a lot more indignation over being lynched, because they know some people are mistaking by voting them. When you're telling the truth and nobody believes you, it's far more frustrating than when lying and nobody believing you.
Quite the opposite, I'm ecstatic. Because you're probably one of the only players here who can prevent your idiotic mislynch.In post 344, Ghostlin wrote:Hi. Those of you who know me are probably pissing and moaning that you had some really bad fucking luck to have me show up.
Oh? And what did you think I was talking about, then?[/quote]In post 342, shos wrote:Just read the towncase, it sucks. Far from what i thought you talked about.
the first is a joke. the second's first line is a joke. the third is ok, the forth is sarcastic. the last has a funny smiley at the end.
In post 356, Malakittens wrote: So on the topic of drinks. As much as I'd love to I have a headache running on three days.
Drinks will make it worse
this? you think this is why I called you scum? lolno. even if, that is not what I did, lol. I asked for a claim, considering a replacement just came, and a replacement cannot negate scummy behaviour of its predecessor OR defend it, so may as well proceed with lynch. However, we don't want to just be lynching around whatever we want, so I ask for a claim; if he is scum, he'll probably have some trouble brewing a fakecaimw ithout reading everything(hopefully he doesn't read everything before he posts if he is..either way it's pressure) and if he is town then there's no problem. so a claim comes out and we can continue to think if we want to lynch according to the claim.In post 221, funkybike1 wrote:Here you have it. Mae, give me one good reason to not just hammer you and get it over with.
lol +1In post 354, mastin2 wrote:Does not compute.In post 353, funkybike1 wrote:Not unvoting though.
If anyone hammers before Ghostlin can post, they will be the next lynch.
You're cute. I'm still working through the game, but I've given you some things to consider. Which you probably won't, because I sorta called you on some shit.In post 348, Grimgroove wrote:You claiming your intent to hammer would be good.
Forcing him to claim while he's still not entirely with his head in the game should provide the most interesting result.
In post 270, mastin2 wrote:VOTE: Lord Mhork.
Right, so Mala, I'm really liking what Mae's selling, combined with Mhork's overall bad posting.
Put it another way--funky might feel like scum...but Mhork also not only feels like scum, but LOOKS like scum as well.
Short on time atm, but basically, I really want today to be Mhork vs. Funky (lean towards Mhork), rather than Funky vs. Mae. Funky vs. Mae feels funky.Doesn't seem right, doesn't seem natural. Also, I know I said (and Mae agrees) that Mhork vs. Funky can't be scum-scum, but I'm kinda getting a gut feeling today that, somehow, despite all logic pointing to that not being right, it actually is right.
Hence, another reason why having the two wagons be Funky and Mhork would be better.
I quoted this answer and response to make a point.In post 271, Lord Mhork wrote:Hey.
Hey mastin.
Hey.
What's townie about Mae's posting? Her post was wrong and based in her making things up that didn't actually happen. Where's the town in her posting? Where's the town motivation in misrepresenting me?
You're not, but you're talking about BV, who's posts at best are garden variety lurker, and at worst are scum lurker who didn't know what the fuck to do with his slot. In a role madness game, that's pretty fucking incredible.In post 285, Grimgroove wrote:Maemuki-bv103 is my Day 1 guess for a scumteam. You guys have to pay me a tribute with a mix of Disney-songs after the game, if I am correct.