I'm going to address your first question second and your second point first.In post 149, Mindgamer wrote:Hi everyone.
Jmo wagon (page 2)
The game was stalling a bit, until Flay made the first push. A wagon was formed, after which Flay drew conclusions from every player's reactions to the wagon. This is how a good townie should play and I townread Flay for it.
Notscience wagon (current)
Another wagon that Flay started. I do not feel this wagon is strong, however. Most voters point towards Notscience's absence of good content, rather than the presence of scummy content. For that reason, I will not support it. I'd rather look for actual scummy behaviour.
One of the reactions that catches my eye is this one:
You go against the flow of the Notscience wagon. But you don't provide any reasoning, you just decide on a 'gut feeling' that you haven't expressed before. Instead, you vote someone that has no votes on them. And again, you didn't express suspicions on N1 before. I feel this is an empty response to the Notscience wagon. You think Notscience is town, but you aren't making any effort to prevent his lynch. You scumread and vote a clean slot, but make zero effort to start a wagon.In post 133, The Acting Method wrote:Endernys: Null, not enough info to go off of. Hasn't posted yet today but other than that no real noticable RQS inaccuracies.
Fart Bane: 46: I agree this sounds interesting. Will you stop making jokes about Flay's title? Seems town.
jmo: Gut town read. May change later... feels different than when I IC'ed him.
Mr. Flay: Gut town read, very townie to me... Of course, I might be committing the same mistake I made my very first game on site. But right now Flays town.
Notscience: Feels town to me.
Side note: not too happy with so many town reads.
Number_0ne: I'm leaning scum on him.
The-Duck: I'm leaning towards town on him.
Zakk: Zakk feels a little scummy, but something about his last vote seems town. Also, even the slightest meta research done on me in n00bs shows all of his complaints as null. His vote on me seems very scum mindset. Also, I don't like his attitude like he knows he's going to get killed soon. With to my recollection, no votes on him, nothing really to point him out. I wouldn't expect him to be dying soon. Don't see town motivation in saying something like that with no reason.
Not supporting a Notscience lynch.
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Number_One
Also, @Flay: At present I haven't gotten anything that I can use straight off the bat from my RQS. I've explained how my RQS is designed up above, we are currently in more of a way two I'm feeling from how my Iso went through. I may go and read through the Iso's again to see if there was anything I see that I missed last time.
But right now, Number_0ne and Zakk are my two top scumspects.
The Acting Method was also the one to start the random question stage, but didn't do anything with those questions until Duck commented on it. The random questions are usually used to get discussion going early game, not late game as TAM is claiming. I find this to be another reason to be suspicious of TAM.
These two thoughts lead me to here:
Vote: The Acting Method
The way RQS works for me and my questions goes 1 of two ways, either it A: gets some discussion generated early game. (usually the lynch all lurkers/liars question) (which I stated) or B: it doesn't start conversation and then it may pop up again mid game when you notice some hypocracies going on. (You can look at my wiki for a game where situation B happened. I think I even mention it.) I never claimed it was late game either so Massive Misrep.
Now to your first. Please read the post you quoted again. Let me explain to you exactly what I did. I did a process called ISO, where I look at each player's post in isolation to all of the others. You could argue that I didn't express any prior suspicions of people for practically anyone I could have voted. Because I didn't say those suspicions before the ISO. AFTER the Iso, (which also serves as a reads list) I voted one of my two chief suspects. The one I didn't like after the tone of his posts if memory serves, I've also said that I will go back and relook at him to see if I was mistaken.
Please explain to me how you see my actions as scummy if you actually look at the whole instead of your own little mindscape. Because I think I might have a new scumspect in you.
