In post 1398, zMuffinMan wrote:wait you... advertised love potion and vote freezer?
In post 907, zMuffinMan wrote:lol. walk me through why you think this makes him scum.
In post 1398, zMuffinMan wrote:wait you... advertised love potion and vote freezer?
In post 907, zMuffinMan wrote:lol. walk me through why you think this makes him scum.
But your pushing it. If it's not relevant to why Nero may or maybe not be scum or scummy, then why push it?
Love Potion x 1 (Targeted): Choose another player, and a target (which may be you). The following Day, any votes made by that player for the specified target will show up as normal but will not actually count, as long as there are more than three players still alive.In post 1429, zMuffinMan wrote:i'm not saying itcouldn'tbe relevant, just that you pushing someone as scum for nothing other than their publicly claimed advertising choice is silly.
Yes, that was ffery. Thanks for the perspective on Peregrine. He's worried me. I mentioned to Cabd last night that his focus on set-up spec and mechanics almost to the exclusion of reads reminded me a little of his first/last day play in Paradox.In post 1431, Harakiri wrote:RE: ?ffery: This is a game that absolutely completely punishes talking to a huge fucking degree. If you want an actual example of how to scumhunt in this game, PV is playing out of his goddamn mind right now and, quite frankly, I find it suspect that people are discounting his points so easily--as divided a town as we are right now, Austerity Measures has the ability tocompletely blow out the game. We are already disadvantaged due to day one and our inability to build a to decide on a course of action, and I have a sneaking suspicion that the scum are actually overpowered via overcompensation from last game.
Yeah I like muffin. I go through occasional moments of freak-out but overall, I like him.As previously mentioned, Muffin is doing a good job too.
Then why aren't you voting?On the whole, I want to make money to salvage the night phase as best we can. Let's lynch hard and fast
how do your current reads compare with this?In post 1436, morph the cat wrote:^Holy fuck we are never ever ever lynching that, if this thing is scum we already lost.
We'd niggle over order a bit in the first three lines. The main thing we disagree with in that section is Klick. Cabd's going to write it up and post it later, but we want to quicklynch the fuck out of Klick.In post 1437, zMuffinMan wrote:how do your current reads compare with this?In post 1436, morph the cat wrote:^Holy fuck we are never ever ever lynching that, if this thing is scum we already lost.
pyro, harakiri
mhork, zdenek, upsidedown, pieguyn
klick, LB, bald, garuda, PV
prohawk
seanald
bb
dr pepper
voided
nero
your name and banakai excluded
In post 1433, zMuffinMan wrote:@PV,
i can't think of a town use for any of them (outside of gambits and keeping them out of scum's hands). i can think of potential scum uses for all of them.
but you're missing my point. i can potentially see someone who... isn't exactly the brighest bulb, for lack of a better euphemism... thinking advertising those abilities is a good idea. it is something i think should be questioned, but it's not necessarily something that makes them scum.
Same for vote freeze. Use it on scum who is bussing or voting other scum.Love Potion x 1 (Targeted): Choose another player, and a target (which may be you). The following Day, any votes made by that player for the specified target will show up as normal but will not actually count, as long as there are more than three players still alive.
- This ability will be automatically removed from the game when there are three or fewer players left alive.
Town would use this NEVER. We get more money the faster we play, which means less discussion, so we are already penalized for more discussion time, so an "ability" than wipes out 2+ days worth of earnings? NO TOWN USE. EVER.Vote Freezer x 2 (Day): Choose another player who is voting, but is not voting for No Lynch. Their vote is now frozen and cannot be changed for the rest of the Day. This will be announced in-thread.
Austerity Measures x 1 (Day): The following Night, every living player (including yourself) loses $100 (to a minimum of $0), after wages and transfers have resolved. This will be announced in-thread
Well, in the Death's Diner game I posted logical reason after logical reason why Baezu was scum. I quoted, annotated, investigated, irrigated, fumigated, and dilated the reasons post-by-post, over and over again.In post 1440, zMuffinMan wrote:OK... i disagree that those are acceptable town uses of the first two (they're still antitown no matter how you look at it), but that's all besides the point i was making, soooooooooo i'm really not sure why you keep bringing it up or what you're getting at here?
The main difference between PxP and here is that Peregrine's actually playing the game and pushing stuff--he wasn't really there. On day 1/2, he pretty much just fell off the face of the map and let Desperado self-destruct.In post 1432, morph the cat wrote:Yes, that was ffery. Thanks for the perspective on Peregrine. He's worried me. I mentioned to Cabd last night that his focus on set-up spec and mechanics almost to the exclusion of reads reminded me a little of his first/last day play in Paradox.
My only worry is that muffin was able to fool me completely in Death's Diner--even after I was given the complete role list, I kept having to check back to make sure I wasn't missing something, he came off so town.Yeah I like muffin. I go through occasional moments of freak-out but overall, I like him.
Sakura asked me to hold off on voting Nero.Then why aren't you voting?
Completely willing to do that.In post 1438, morph the cat wrote:Cabd's going to write it up and post it later, but we want to quicklynch the fuck out of Klick.
Just curious, but how did we end up in that pile? Purely based on Sakura?In post 1435, pieguyn wrote:scum: Voided, Harakiri, Mhork, Klick
Let's see if you are correct:In post 1443, zMuffinMan wrote:you're hitting me with a chicken, and everyone is going, "why are you hitting muffin with a chicken?" and you're claiming it's a duck
Um, nope, it was a duck.In post 1441, PeregrineV wrote:So, I now believe if I slap you with a duck, it quacks, and everyone goes "Holy Shit you see that duckslap!", and you say "Why you hit me with a chicken?", that you are scum.
I had negative value to the scumteam once the two town players from lylo flipped.In post 1444, Harakiri wrote:The main difference between PxP and here is that Peregrine's actually playing the game and pushing stuff--he wasn't really there. On day 1/2, he pretty much just fell off the face of the map and let Desperado self-destruct.In post 1432, morph the cat wrote:Yes, that was ffery. Thanks for the perspective on Peregrine. He's worried me. I mentioned to Cabd last night that his focus on set-up spec and mechanics almost to the exclusion of reads reminded me a little of his first/last day play in Paradox.
In post 1444, Harakiri wrote:My only worry is that muffin was able to fool me completely in Death's Diner--even after I was given the complete role list, I kept having to check back to make sure I wasn't missing something, he came off so town.Yeah I like muffin. I go through occasional moments of freak-out but overall, I like him.
And you have already stated the reason leaving him around is dangerous.In post 1444, Harakiri wrote:PEDIT: peregrine strikes again! We can worry about muffin later, though, bro.
Because that one point is not enough to be worth lynching Seanald over. Yes, it's scummy. Yes, it's a very questionable advertisement choice. But are you telling me it's so salient that it's worth lynching Seanald over anyone else? Nero has this problem and more with his advertisement of Love Potion and Vote Freeze, as well as the problem with Mhork; does that not hold more weight thanIn post 1424, PeregrineV wrote:Are you arguing that I shouldn't vote Seanald because he's not scummy enough?
You feel that lynching people based almost solely on their advertisement choices is playing a good game here?In post 1431, Harakiri wrote:PV is playing out of his goddamn mind right now and, quite frankly, I find it suspect that people are discounting his points so easily--as divided a town as we are right now,
I said that because it looked like he was responding to me, but I wasn't sure if it was at me or Upside Down, since we both had questioned almost the same thing. How is that making my statement less strong, btw?In post 1434, pieguyn wrote:156 I don't like voided's "(unless it's not at me, but still.)", since he's actively trying to make his statement less strong by putting that in there. IMO it gives the impression he cares about how he looks
I wasn't being serious either, but it was a fucking awful pun and BB should feel bad for the rest of the game for saying it.In post 1434, pieguyn wrote:189 fairly certain voided is mafia. the comment about a dayvig seems so fake, given the post he quoted wasn't even serious
Well, unless we're so phenomenally fucktarded enough to not allocate everything properly from this night onwards, I don't see how it's not possible. Why do you believe that we might not be able to keep abilities like deadline out of scum's hands?In post 1434, pieguyn wrote:474 how can you be sure of that
What do you like about it? Is it the same reason LB liked it, or?In post 1434, pieguyn wrote:442 I like
Because that one point is not enough to be worth lynching Seanald over. Yes, it's scummy. Yes, it's a very questionable advertisement choice. But are you telling me it's so salient that it's worth lynching Seanald over anyone else? Nero has this problem and more with his advertisement of Love Potion and Vote Freeze, as well as the problem with Mhork; does that not hold more weight thanIn post 1424, PeregrineV wrote:Are you arguing that I shouldn't vote Seanald because he's not scummy enough?
You feel that lynching people based almost solely on their advertisement choices is playing a good game here?In post 1431, Harakiri wrote:PV is playing out of his goddamn mind right now and, quite frankly, I find it suspect that people are discounting his points so easily--as divided a town as we are right now,
I said that because it looked like he was responding to me, but I wasn't sure if it was at me or Upside Down, since we both had questioned almost the same thing. How is that making my statement less strong, btw?In post 1434, pieguyn wrote:156 I don't like voided's "(unless it's not at me, but still.)", since he's actively trying to make his statement less strong by putting that in there. IMO it gives the impression he cares about how he looks
I wasn't being serious either, but it was a fucking awful pun and BB should feel bad for the rest of the game for saying it.In post 1434, pieguyn wrote:189 fairly certain voided is mafia. the comment about a dayvig seems so fake, given the post he quoted wasn't even serious
Well, unless we're so phenomenally fucktarded enough to not allocate everything properly from this night onwards, I don't see how it's not possible. Why do you believe that we might not be able to keep abilities like deadline out of scum's hands?In post 1434, pieguyn wrote:474 how can you be sure of that
What do you like about it? Is it the same reason LB liked it, or?In post 1434, pieguyn wrote:442 I like
What exactly are you referring to here? My response to Bald or responses to harakiri?In post 1434, pieguyn wrote:524 not the singled-one-thing-out argument plz
A.) I wasn't heavily involved in it, but I did give my opinions.In post 1434, pieguyn wrote:666 bidding on neighborizer seems like a BS claim. he wasn't really involved in the neighborizer discussion IIRC, so I'm calling the shit on this shit. you'd think if he had some opinion on the neighborizer he'd give it when everyone was talking about it.
But that still holds the problem of using neighborizor that was explained beforehand. Even if, say, Right Scum used it to contact Left Scum for stuff, they still have to convince the other side that they aren't town trolling them and they still can't entirely go off of what the dead scum says. For all they know it could just be made up lies because he/she doesn't believe it's the opposite scumteam calling them or because they're just trolling.In post 1434, pieguyn wrote:780 holy shit interesting point about the medium. it seems likely scum could get it and then, when an opposing scum dies, just use it on them and communicate that way, although it wouldn't be as efficient as outright neighborizing someone
Huh?In post 1434, pieguyn wrote:785 asking what the point of a question is without even explaining why it might not have a point or answering the question. scum
How the fuck do you even GET that?! If I cared about how I looked, why would I even admit I made an error? Wouldn't doing that make me kinda look bad anyways?In post 1434, pieguyn wrote:982 "Fine, I admit I missed where garuda said they'd advertise that." implies you were trying to hide where you made an error, implying you care about how you look
Meh. It's fair enough as far as catchup goes, but I guess I'd warm to it more of her scumread on me wasn't based off of my reaction to a joke post that wasn't even serious and then went on to make almost every other post I make as being scummy or inferring reasoning that was never there.In post 1436, morph the cat wrote:^Holy fuck we are never ever ever lynching that, if this thing is scum we already lost.