I wasn't able to get to your responses in time, sorry.
So you find me suspicious for threatening to do the "shot mid-sentence" joke?
In post 1663, pieguyn wrote:442. I can't remember exact specifics on what happened somewhere in those 58 pages that I didn't write down sry
...You really didn't write down what you thought about someone claiming something like investigation immune beyond "I like this"?
In post 1663, pieguyn wrote:524. no I got the impression you were mad because he told you to respond to something he said about just one thing you posted instead of considering everything you posted. i'm tired so I'd love if you could explain better with quotes/links, plz
Well, yes, that is what I'm annoyed about. Strawmanning my LB townread into being only because I didn't like Bald's push is Anti-town at best, and I see no town motivation for Bald to do what he did. Certainly he had to have seen where I mentioned that LB's thoughts behind the II claim plan and the revelation of it furthered my townread on them?
In post 1663, pieguyn wrote:785. no you questioned what the point of the question was. it didn't seem from your other posts that you were suspecting him for asking pointless questions, you just started questioning him for asking questions without explaining anything. this gives the impression you just don't want him asking you questions. it also didn't seem for me that he was asking pointless questions in the first place
Because, as I said, I didn't understand at the time that the two posts in question were very similar (nor did I have a reason to think that there was something amiss at the time), and thought that he was just trying to softly posit some kind of scum intention from the posts in question. I had asked them with the intention of getting him to explain himself about this (and why he had asked that and another question previously that was actually a useless question IMO).
In post 1663, pieguyn wrote:982 a. it's not that you admitted it it's that the way you admitted it just seems weird.
So you found my terse acceptance of the mistake (and my annoyance at him claiming I'm spreading information) scummy?
Perhaps I should elaborate. It looks to me like you decidedly said I was scummy based off of 189. The rest of your responses in regards to me would then be based of whether or not they enforce that scumread or point against it, correct? If so, then I'm saying that you continuing to find me scummy starting from a response to a joke post that wasn't meant to be taken as a serious thing is funny to me.
Of course, if you're just saying that 189 solidified the scumread, then this point is moot.
Maybe people aren't quicklynching Klick because your single-sentence posts demanding/asking that Klick be quicklynched are getting annoying.
In post 1706, morph the cat wrote:Do we believe you about that post being (part of?) a scenario exploration? I can read it that way, so I'm no longer pushing it as a slip.
Thank you.
And very well.
Also, are abilities like doctor and neighborizer being advertised in advance of the next cycle of auctions?
