Open 534 - Killing at the Frat (Day 5)

[Neonizer]

What's an alt?

[bubbajack8]

What's an alt?

What every alt says.

[REGINA+]

Why?

[BROseidon]

The sweet bros continue to stand around, unsure of what to do next.

Vote Count 1.02:

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch

TCold – Marcrell
bubbajack8 – Sakura Hana
startfromtheheart – bubbajack8, Neonizer
Wake88 – Ms Marangal, notscience
Nachomamma8 – startfromtheheart, Mario4
notscience – REGINA+, Borophil

Not voting: TCold, Wake88, Nachomamma8

Deadline is in (expired on 2013-11-07 11:29:24)

Sakura Hana is V/LA through Monday.
TCold has been prodded

[BoroPhil]

I'm more concerned about bubba wanting a nacho counter wagon, then he not jumping on ns to create a counter wagon himself, so i decided to try a counter wagon on him instead.

I see where confusion came, and I'll answer this post

doesn't notscience's count?

if

you jumped on, he would have 3?

Look at bold. Look at my vote. Look at last comment.

I'm afraid you are going to have to explain this one

Would it appear I'm jumping on Notscience's.

hang on.

you expressed disappointment at the lack of a counter-wagon
yet one was available to you
if you were so disappointed, why didn't you jump on it?

In hopes to answer you.

My counter-wagon was startsfromthehearts, the first person to vote Nacho. I see now that notscience was the 2nd on, sakura 3rd, Mario4 4th.

THEN I voted startsfromthehearts.

That's 4 on Nacho, 2 on not. So sure not was there, but Not was asking what an either-or fallacy was, so I wasn't going to vote him when he's asking me to explain my vote in RVS. And I honestly don't like startsfromthehearts continued badly drawn reasons for voting Nacho (granted it is RVS, but instead of helping he's just posting memes.)

right. so you are quite defensive of not, even at this early stage. interesting.

[Marcrell]

I can't really say that being defensive is a hard scum tell, but it can be. Last game I got in trouble for being overly defensive but I wasn't scum. But considering the mafia needs to make sure people think they're town, it can be an indicator as well.

[Wake1]

Alright, time to start playing.

Defensiveness, as you know, is not always indicative of guilt my friend.

In fact, aggression, like defensiveness, are neutral behaviors.

The eternal ordeal is discovering the intentions behind them.

[startfromtheheart]

Nacho if you would acknowledge me, I might actually, you know, consider removing my vote <3

But nooooooooooo

[notscience]

People should sheep me and Nacho.

[BoroPhil]

I can't really say that being defensive is a hard scum tell, but it can be. Last game I got in trouble for being overly defensive but I wasn't scum. But considering the mafia needs to make sure people think they're town, it can be an indicator as well.

yes, but defending someone else for no real reason at this stage is quite interesting

[bubbajack8]

right. so you are quite defensive of not, even at this early stage. interesting.

I'm sorry but I don't feel like I'm "defending him" I just said I'm not jumping on his "wagon" and gave reasons as to why I was not jumping on his wagon. I did not give reasons to get off his wagon, nor did I try to convince people not to vote him. I gave my reasons for not voting him at this current time, and you can take it as you will.

Alright, time to start playing.

Defensiveness, as you know, is not always indicative of guilt my friend.

In fact, aggression, like defensiveness, are neutral behaviors.

The eternal ordeal is discovering the intentions behind them.

Finally something actually contributing. (sort of) None the less, you haven't been aggressive, or defensive, so why point out they are neutral?

I can't really say that being defensive is a hard scum tell, but it can be. Last game I got in trouble for being overly defensive but I wasn't scum. But considering the mafia needs to make sure people think they're town, it can be an indicator as well.

yes, but defending someone else for no real reason at this stage is quite interesting

Not was asking what an either-or fallacy was, so I wasn't going to vote him when he's asking me to explain my vote in RVS.

I'm sorry is this not a real reason? Really you'd make a better argument to say I'm defending Nacho.

[Mario4]

Does anyone have any good scum reads?

[notscience]

Does anyone have any good scum reads?

Do YOU have any reads?

[Mario4]

I have none right now

[BROseidon]

nachomamma8 has been prodded

edit: Given the site-wide problems today, I'm not counting this prod against his total for replacement purposes immediately. It'll count if he hasn't posted by the time I wake up tomorrow morning (roughly 12 hours).

[Nachomamma8]

HEYSCREWYOU

<3

[notscience]

HEYSCREWYOU

<3

NACHO WHY ARE THEY NOT SHEEPING US

[Nachomamma8]

oh i dunno mostly cuz i forgot i was voting the guy i'm voting

[Nachomamma8]

Nacho if you would acknowledge me, I might actually, you know, consider removing my vote <3

But nooooooooooo

who are you?

[notscience]

oh i dunno mostly cuz i forgot i was voting the guy i'm voting

You're voting Wake and he has a scum role pm and needs to die

[startfromtheheart]

who are you?

gimme a B

gimme an E

gimme an R

gimme a T

what does that spell??????????????

[notscience]

who are you?

gimme a B

gimme an E

gimme an R

gimme a T

what does that spell??????????????

Can I get a Z?

[Ms Marangal]

This is disappointing.

VOTE: Nacho

Mod, I was voting Wake, not Nacho

Fixed. Please correct any further mistakes I make.

[Ms Marangal]

Nacho isn't even voting anyone.

[BoroPhil]

right. so you are quite defensive of not, even at this early stage. interesting.

I'm sorry but I don't feel like I'm "defending him" I just said I'm not jumping on his "wagon" and gave reasons as to why I was not jumping on his wagon. I did not give reasons to get off his wagon, nor did I try to convince people not to vote him. I gave my reasons for not voting him at this current time, and you can take it as you will.

Alright, time to start playing.

Defensiveness, as you know, is not always indicative of guilt my friend.

In fact, aggression, like defensiveness, are neutral behaviors.

The eternal ordeal is discovering the intentions behind them.

Finally something actually contributing. (sort of) None the less, you haven't been aggressive, or defensive, so why point out they are neutral?

I can't really say that being defensive is a hard scum tell, but it can be. Last game I got in trouble for being overly defensive but I wasn't scum. But considering the mafia needs to make sure people think they're town, it can be an indicator as well.

yes, but defending someone else for no real reason at this stage is quite interesting

Not was asking what an either-or fallacy was, so I wasn't going to vote him when he's asking me to explain my vote in RVS.

I'm sorry is this not a real reason? Really you'd make a better argument to say I'm defending Nacho.

More interesting reactions...