In post 264, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:It's funny that you are "pissed off about people's laziness" when, besides TiP, you've been the only other unhelpful player. You had to be asked multiple times by multiple people to justify your read on TiP before you came up with 243. So, you really don't have a leg to stand on with calling other people lazy. You didn't even join the thread until long after the rest of us here had a dialogue going.
And 243 said the same thing in two lines what 193 did in one. Which got within five minutes a bit all caps post that I should stop deflecting. At which point I'm indeed starting to question whether you are actually reading the game or that the only thing about 193 that caught your eye was the fact that I used your name.
actually.
It's the same as your response to bulba's post about f-16. You say agree and then show you still don't get it. It's not particulary hard, we were hardly the only ones that got it, including f16 himself. But you are contrary there. It's the same around the tip case. You simply do not get the lines of thought. I think the thing that frustrates me when talking to you is that your mindset is different. You simply do not think as town.
vote etl
I don't see this vote changing anytime soon.
@F-16, I don't say you are bad. I specifically avoided saying that. You posted a lot and there were good intentions around that, but at the time of my post I didn't care too much about that. The way you post invites votes though, it's not very smooth. That's fine. What I didn't think was fine was that it moved you towards the default wagon people could agree on if their first choice failed, which was what I was seeing and which I thought was a bad thing. It doesn't say a lot in terms of vote analysis, the fact that a big portion of the town agrees without all that many reasons around means scum are bound to be among them, and a wagon that around the start of day one is favored by scum is likely to be on town. Scum will try to avoid having the default wagon end up on one of them, there's no good reason for it since there are enough candidates to end up as a lynch d1 generally.
So I kind of said everything I though in that post already. I didn't white knight you because you are a bad player, or because I liked your posts particulary. I found in necessary to say that the way the rest was moving around you made you likely town and that it would be a bad idea to keep going like that.
Further, I don't see the need for anything more then that I didn't like his reactions and that it started with post 14. Which was indeed what I posted.