You mean voting the active lurker?In post 3209, Titus wrote:Benmage, how about actually saying something productive?
I think I'm the only one doing something productive.
You mean voting the active lurker?In post 3209, Titus wrote:Benmage, how about actually saying something productive?
tierce, that should answer what I have read so far. I thought you would have noticed that.In post 3160, Titus wrote:Naut, I have looked at the VCs, and the ISOs of the major wagons and all action since I subbed in.
That was last night. Is that it? Are you not going to read anything else?In post 3226, Titus wrote:tierce, that should answer what I have read so far. I thought you would have noticed that.In post 3160, Titus wrote:Naut, I have looked at the VCs, and the ISOs of the major wagons and all action since I subbed in.
That's not a nice thing to say to someone who missed 120pages of this game.In post 3214, Tierce wrote:
Hey Kats I really want to lynch you right now for your attempts at pandering to me.
Re-read me pushing on Garruk early D3, and then Tierce's responses.In post 3169, Cephrir wrote:In post 3168, Doctor Jekyll wrote:I was examining the area around his wagon for anyone who might have been deliberately detracting from it. I was also looking for potentially awkward half bussing but I didn't find anything that stuck out.
???Because Tierce pretty much universally fucked over anyone who tried to even hint at Garruk-scum
Scum doublevoter isn't a terrible stretch, although I would expect it to be limited. Scum giving out a # of how many scum there are doesn't seem probable at all.
So the answer is no. Gotcha.In post 3171, Nautilius wrote:I'm doing something else atm.In post 3167, AGar wrote:Wanna stop fucking pussyfooting it?
I saw them. Nothing is universally anything.In post 3233, AGar wrote:Re-read me pushing on Garruk early D3, and then Tierce's responses.In post 3169, Cephrir wrote:In post 3168, Doctor Jekyll wrote:I was examining the area around his wagon for anyone who might have been deliberately detracting from it. I was also looking for potentially awkward half bussing but I didn't find anything that stuck out.
???Because Tierce pretty much universally fucked over anyone who tried to even hint at Garruk-scum
In post 3233, AGar wrote:Scum doublevoter isn't a terrible stretch, although I would expect it to be limited. Scum giving out a # of how many scum there are doesn't seem probable at all.
In post 3233, AGar wrote:So the answer is no. Gotcha.In post 3171, Nautilius wrote:I'm doing something else atm.In post 3167, AGar wrote:Wanna stop fucking pussyfooting it?
Nautscum is probably a thing.
I thought it was the other way around because of the ninja comments earlier, so I can't disagree that he needs to answer clearly himself. Besides after the way he was swearing at you earlier Tierce I hardly think he deserves white knighting. I'd rather you tell me who the scum are so I know who to vote/flambe. <.<In post 3233, AGar wrote:@TierceYou're really missing a key point for why people are questioning this SD thing. Ceph brought it up in #3224.Let SD do the talking, because since you've started answering for him, he's gone quiet. There's some serious disconnects in his story, and they need to be ironed out or strung up. I get your frustration that this is being hung up on something you see as fairly cut and dried, but the rest of us don't so stop trying to squash it.
In post 3191, Tammy wrote:THEN WHY DID YOU CLAIM UNLESS NAUTILUS WAS A NINJA HE DIDN'T GO ANYWHERE NIGHT TWO?In post 3187, SafetyDance wrote:I cant use a 1shot block twice. Nice try.In post 3180, Tammy wrote:So SafetyDance if you roleblocked Quadz last night because you were suspicious of him, why does it not worry you that we are missing a kill last night?
That should make you a little more worried about quadz, not feel utterly nonchalant about the whole business.
AND WHEN ZDENEK ASKED YOU WHY YOU TRACKED NAUTILUS YOU DIDN'T CORRECT HIM THAT YOU BLOCKED HIM?
LIKE FFS.
In post 3085, SafetyDance wrote:Pfft. More than happy to volley snarky bs back with interest.In post 3081, Cephrir wrote:Well that was unnecessarily hostile.
You confused Ninja with Strongman, your brilliance.
Ninja's avoid detection, which is how Naut would avoid being detected doing anything night 2.
LIKE FFSIn post 2579, Zdenek wrote:SafetyDance, I still want to know why you chose Nautilus.
Haha, hadn't realised this was an open setup with accountable game mechanics! I'm scum because I haven't made a table, ya got me!In post 3199, Garruk Relentless wrote:SSK checking in here. In addition to SD's lack of clarity regarding his claim, this hydra also thinks he's scum because of the difference of his play as compared to Lucid Dreamers Mafia. In Lucid Dreamers, he was way more active and making cases more on everyone. And you know, so explicit with how roles worked that he actually made a table of all the actions that had been performed. So in conclusion
Vote SafetyDance
-SSK
I know I'm not an idiot, it does get tiresome having to respond to all the idiot comments, it does rather limit scumhunting, and I'd much prefer to do that with the limited time I have. I love your meta arguments btw, they change more than kanye's reads. <3In post 3221, Tammy wrote:I'd probably be down with a safety dance lynch. Meta him. I read through that game Garruck mentioned, and safety dance wanted to lynch chkflip for lol not playing the game. He's also been active in at least one other game all month while doing nothing but lobbing sanctimonious insults in this game.
He's not some blundering VI fool. He knows how to play this damn game and I don't know why he's being written off as the town idiot when he's patently not a fucking idiot.
I swear if he's scum. Words. There will be words.