Open 534 - Killing at the Frat (Day 5)

[Nachomamma8]

Sakura is town. She sheeps when she's town.

She sheeps regardless of alignment.

[Nachomamma8]

NS is my top scum read. His push on wake was baseless. And, I might add, incorrect. Again. I'll expand in the case I'm working on.

Who cares if a push is baseless so early in the game?

[Sakura Hana]

She sheeps regardless of alignment.

Tho this is true in the fact that i'd sheep you regardless of alignment, I dont recall ever playing with you when im scum.

[Nachomamma8]

We played a couple chat games where you were scum, but nothing else.

[MVP]

NS is my top scum read. His push on wake was baseless. And, I might add, incorrect. Again. I'll expand in the case I'm working on.

I'm excited to see this case.

[notscience]

NS is my top scum read. His push on wake was baseless. And, I might add, incorrect. Again. I'll expand in the case I'm working on.

I'm excited to see this case.

fuck me

[Nachomamma8]

NS WE'RE VOTING THE SAME PERSON FOR REAL THIS TIME

[Nachomamma8]

AND EVERYONE SHOULD TOTALLY SHEEP US

[notscience]

NS WE'RE VOTING THE SAME PERSON FOR REAL THIS TIME

AND EVERYONE SHOULD TOTALLY SHEEP US

I KNOW

ETL HAS A CASE ON ME THOUGH THIS OUGHT TO BE GOOD

[Nachomamma8]

i thought her case was "the push on my slot was baseless"
aka bullshit

[notscience]

i thought her case was "the push on my slot was baseless"
aka bullshit

I specifically enjoyed the part where she thinks anything coming out of RVS can have a mastin-level base

[REGINA+]

Everyone's just talking about how people usually play

but I'm not about that yo.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: Wake

I like thinking of him as scum. It makes sense. The argument is less confusing, at least.

This vote was not counted, as Wake is no longer in the game

[EspeciallyTheLies]

Hm. Ok. If you guys arent willing to wait for me to explain my reads (i.e. when I get out of work today) then you should just lynch me now. I'm not really interested in defending myself when I've done nothing substantial yet and can't read my predecessor's thoughts for whatever case you have up to this point.

When that's done, look at nacho/ns. That was quite the leap on my minimal post. Kthx.

[notscience]

Hm. Ok. If you guys arent willing to wait for me to explain my reads (i.e. when I get out of work today) then you should just lynch me now. I'm not really interested in defending myself when I've done nothing substantial yet and can't read my predecessor's thoughts for whatever case you have up to this point.

When that's done, look at nacho/ns. That was quite the leap on my minimal post. Kthx.

dat AtE

[EspeciallyTheLies]

Please point it out and explain why it fits the definition of AtE. Thank you.

[BoroPhil]

Welcome ETL! Who is Marcrell?

I am a relatively new player who has played two games on the site before and may be a bit overconfident in how much I think I know about the game. I'm not sure.

I like to hear it!

I swear I posted something earlier. not and bubba are still scum.

Your case is great.

Good enough for me!

Unvote
Vote: ETL

When we are positing actual reasons on everybody else, gut suffices?

if you are implying that is my case, you are obviously forgetting our earlier interactions. or not forgetting them as the case may be.

[bubbajack8]

When we are positing actual reasons on everybody else, gut suffices?

I trust Nacho's gut.

After ETL's last post. This especially popped out to me (see quote) and I can agree with the vote. Not the reason behind it.

NS is my top scum read. His push on wake was baseless. And, I might add, incorrect. Again. I'll expand in the case I'm working on.

There are other people who have had baseless pushes. Why pick NS over others? Because he was pushing on you.

Furthermore:

VOTE: Wake

You're asking for reads without trying to stimulate conversation. That whole 49 looks forced.

He provides a reason there.

i thought her case was "the push on my slot was baseless"
aka bullshit

This.

Welcome ETL! Who is Marcrell?

I am a relatively new player who has played two games on the site before and may be a bit overconfident in how much I think I know about the game. I'm not sure.

I like to hear it!

I swear I posted something earlier. not and bubba are still scum.

Your case is great.

Good enough for me!

Unvote
Vote: ETL

When we are positing actual reasons on everybody else, gut suffices?

if you are implying that is my case, you are obviously forgetting our earlier interactions. or not forgetting them as the case may be.

Your Case:

doesn't notscience's count?

if

you jumped on, he would have 3?

Look at bold. Look at my vote. Look at last comment.

I'm afraid you are going to have to explain this one

Would it appear I'm jumping on Notscience's.

hang on.

you expressed disappointment at the lack of a counter-wagon
yet one was available to you
if you were so disappointed, why didn't you jump on it?

Reason 1 I'm scum: I was disappointed in lack of counter wagon but someone else believed there to be a counter wagon, that I didn't join. Even though I had already expressed I didn't think the "counter-wagon" was scum.

right. so you are quite defensive of not, even at this early stage. interesting.

Reason 2 I'm scum: I'm "defensive" of not

More interesting reactions...

Reason 3: I'm scum: Interesting reactions.

It all seems a bit fake. You bemoan the lack of a counterwagon, despite one being there, then when one is pointed out to you, you come up with some anti-reasons. now you bring out a barrage of smileys.

not convinced at all.

Reason 4: I seem fake.

Reason 5: I defended myself with anti-reasons

Reason 6: I brought out a barrage of smileys.

Great case man. Real great.

furthermore: I love your usage of interesting

Spoiler:

interesting.

quite interesting

More interesting

You only went into depth what interesting meant once. And that's when I used my "barrage of smilies"

UNVOTE:

[notscience]

Hm. Ok. If you guys arent willing to wait for me to explain my reads (i.e. when I get out of work today) then you should just lynch me now. I'm not really interested in defending myself when I've done nothing substantial yet and can't read my predecessor's thoughts for whatever case you have up to this point.

When that's done, look at nacho/ns. That was quite the leap on my minimal post. Kthx.

Oh woe is me I can't defend myself

[EspeciallyTheLies]

lol fuck you ns. That's totally not even the point of that post AT ALL and the fact that you are attempting to twist it that way is pretty indicative.

[BoroPhil]

can we just end today now please? no point dragging it out

UNVOTE:
VOTE: bubbajack

[notscience]

lol fuck you ns. That's totally not even the point of that post AT ALL and the fact that you are attempting to twist it that way is pretty indicative.

I'm still waiting for that case.

TThat post is literally "You guys are probably going to lynch me so nah I have n oreason to do this"

Self-defeatism=AtE

[EspeciallyTheLies]

No dude. It's "I have no idea what's going on because end of the month = deadline at work" and shit just got fucked up. We're done today so I finally don't have to work at home or on the weekend, and can spend some time with this game.

[Ms Marangal]

So

Nacho's scum

and he's ignoring me

[notscience]

So

Nacho's scum

and he's ignoring me

The fuck are you smoking

I want some

[Ms Marangal]

As I've said I think Nacho is town. Also jumping on him for not contributing at this point is a super easy vote to make and doesn't do much to advance things.

and you're probably town, but what makes it an easy vote?

Nacho isn't the worst player, and the player base isn't the worst so he has a fairly good chance of getting out of a wagon, and winning the favor of quite a few people. About half the player base is made of people who know what they are doing, and won't derp-lynch anyone

Nacho also isn't reaching out to me yet, which is something I don't like. especially when he has me as town for god-knows-why