Open 534 - Killing at the Frat (Day 5)

bubbajack8 · Post Post #375 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:19 pm

Can you pl0x stop death tunneling oh my gosh.

Sound of Silence · Post Post #376 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:19 pm

In post 372, notscience wrote:FferyGIF why did you have to replace into a scum slot >.>

hi guys

notsci!!! why are you voting obvtown, dude?

Sound of Silence · Post Post #377 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:21 pm

FERY Y U NO BOOKMARK

I'm here!

Sound of Silence · Post Post #378 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:21 pm

In post 374, notscience wrote:
In post 373, bubbajack8 wrote:Finally. Holy crap. Now can we move on.

AND OMG HI GIF!
IAWTP

He drew scum though ;(

I don't think any "he" replaced out. Sooooo we're safe!

bubbajack8 · Post Post #379 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:22 pm

If there are 2 talking right now can you please sign your posts?

Sound of Silence · Post Post #380 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:23 pm

You'll be able to tell us apart quite easily, Mr.whydoieventry.

Sound of Silence · Post Post #381 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:24 pm

In post 377, Sound of Silence wrote:FERY Y U NO BOOKMARK

I'm here!

I WAS TOO BUSY READING UP TO PAGE 3!

bubbajack8 · Post Post #382 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:29 pm

In post 380, Sound of Silence wrote:You'll be able to tell us apart quite easily, Mr.whydoieventry.

yeong, I don't know about that

Sound of Silence · Post Post #383 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:30 pm

In post 86, Mario4 wrote:Does anyone have any good scum reads?

How about now? Do you have reads yet?

notscience · Post Post #384 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:32 pm

He was refering to GIF ffery

GIF, only I am obvtown.

Your slot is obvscum though :/

Sound of Silence · Post Post #385 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:33 pm

In post 99, BoroPhil wrote:
In post 85, bubbajack8 wrote:
In post 79, BoroPhil wrote: right. so you are quite defensive of not, even at this early stage. interesting.
I'm sorry but I don't feel like I'm "defending him" I just said I'm not jumping on his "wagon" and gave reasons as to why I was not jumping on his wagon. I did not give reasons to get off his wagon, nor did I try to convince people not to vote him. I gave my reasons for not voting him at this current time, and you can take it as you will.

In post 81, Wake1 wrote:Alright, time to start playing.

Defensiveness, as you know, is not always indicative of guilt my friend.

In fact, aggression, like defensiveness, are neutral behaviors.

The eternal ordeal is discovering the intentions behind them.
Finally something actually contributing. (sort of) None the less, you haven't been aggressive, or defensive, so why point out they are neutral?

In post 84, BoroPhil wrote:
In post 80, Marcrell wrote:I can't really say that being defensive is a hard scum tell, but it can be. Last game I got in trouble for being overly defensive but I wasn't scum. But considering the mafia needs to make sure people think they're town, it can be an indicator as well.
yes, but defending someone else for no real reason at this stage is quite interesting

In post 71, bubbajack8 wrote:Not was asking what an either-or fallacy was, so I wasn't going to vote him when he's asking me to explain my vote in RVS.
I'm sorry is this not a real reason? Really you'd make a better argument to say I'm defending Nacho.
More interesting reactions...

But are they scummy reactions?

Sound of Silence · Post Post #386 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:34 pm

NS, you mixed our posts up. GJ.

Sound of Silence · Post Post #387 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:34 pm

In post 384, notscience wrote:He was refering to GIF ffery

GIF, only I am obvtown.

Your slot is obvscum though :/

Who was referring to GiF? What are you talking about? You're way too confusing to be obvtown.

notscience · Post Post #388 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:35 pm

Bubba was

ISO me if you care to see what I'm talking about

And lolwut

Sound of Silence · Post Post #389 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:36 pm

In post 102, Sakura Hana wrote:So I'm back and I find it highly interesting that Nacho still hasn't found scum.

Nacho you got 24 hours to give me something to sheep or i'll sheep the wagon on you.

You think scum-Nacho would be shy about putting down a vote?

Sound of Silence · Post Post #390 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:37 pm

In post 104, startfromtheheart wrote:
Vote: Wake88

Why are you pushing wake, notscience? I'm pushing but I'd like to know why I'm helping you push him

Why are you helping someone push something you don't know why they are pushing?

bubbajack8 · Post Post #391 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:37 pm

In post 388, notscience wrote:Bubba was

when? You've got me confused.

notscience · Post Post #392 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:38 pm

In post 378, Sound of Silence wrote:
In post 374, notscience wrote:
In post 373, bubbajack8 wrote:Finally. Holy crap. Now can we move on.

AND OMG HI GIF!
IAWTP

He drew scum though ;(
I don't think any "he" replaced out. Sooooo we're safe!

Sound of Silence · Post Post #393 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:39 pm

That was me telling you that ETL is not "he"

Sound of Silence · Post Post #394 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:40 pm

In post 113, BoroPhil wrote:
In post 100, bubbajack8 wrote:
In post 92, Nachomamma8 wrote:oh i dunno mostly cuz i forgot i was voting the guy i'm voting

In post 94, notscience wrote: You're voting Wake and he has a scum role pm and needs to die

In post 98, Ms Marangal wrote:Nacho isn't even voting anyone.
Just went to check. MM is correct. Which would explain how Nacho "forgot who he was voting". the question is why is notscience pushing Wake? And saying that Nacho is voting him when he's not.

@Boro: You want to give reasons besides just saying it's "interesting?" -_-
It all seems a bit fake. You bemoan the lack of a counterwagon, despite one being there, then when one is pointed out to you, you come up with some anti-reasons. now you bring out a barrage of smileys.

not convinced at all.

Your vote wasn't convinced. It was sitting on notsci. Am I going to find that you eventually moved your vote where your suspicions lay?

bubbajack8 · Post Post #395 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:41 pm

In post 392, notscience wrote:
In post 378, Sound of Silence wrote:
In post 374, notscience wrote:
In post 373, bubbajack8 wrote:Finally. Holy crap. Now can we move on.

AND OMG HI GIF!
IAWTP

He drew scum though ;(
I don't think any "he" replaced out. Sooooo we're safe!

I was talking about the replace out, and how we;ll have less your bad arguments, and actual arguments.

Sound of Silence · Post Post #396 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:42 pm

In post 115, Dry-fit wrote:Did a quick read through. Surprised to see Mara playing by herself.

I'm leaning town on Nacho. Scum have extra incentive in this setup to keep their buddies alive. So Nacho is town or his wagon is town driven.

Boro seems town as well. He isn't playing like last time I played with him, when he was scum. He seems much more curious about figuring things out this time.

Neonizer also reads town.

As for scumreads, nothing really sticks out yet. The thing that raises suspicions most is 51. A very weak pseudoattack on Nacho voters. It looks like feigned concern about that wagon.

VOTE: REGINA+
.

Oh look at this. Voting the newb.

notscience · Post Post #397 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:42 pm

Fair enough.

Doesn't change their role pm.

Sound of Silence · Post Post #398 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:43 pm

In post 121, notscience wrote:Wake.

Mario is a newbie. Wake isn't.

<3

Sound of Silence · Post Post #399 (ISO) » Mon Nov 04, 2013 4:43 pm

In post 397, notscience wrote:Fair enough.

Doesn't change their role pm.

What is this in reference to?