But drunken VCs are the best VCs!In post 900, borkjerfkin wrote:no vc last night on account of i was drunk
See, this is just way too opportunistic. He's just going for the easy wagon. No reasoning behind why he would switch to bro. Minimal on why he has his vote on me. It's cray.In post 888, zMuffinMan wrote:if the mafiassk wagon goes nowhere, i'll probably join the bro wagon.
oh, and i'm not gonna be around much for the next 48ish hours.
Fuck this.In post 821, MafiaSSK wrote:I love how people be hatin on the lurkers.
Hey, here's the problem. There's just about only one reason TO vote for you: You lurk like hell. You have what, 4 posts in this game? IIRC, you also ask an obvious af question to look like you were contributing when you really weren't.MafiaSSK wrote:See, this is just way too opportunistic. He's just going for the easy wagon. No reasoning behind why he would switch to bro. Minimal on why he has his vote on me. It's cray.In post 888, zMuffinMan wrote:if the mafiassk wagon goes nowhere, i'll probably join the bro wagon.
oh, and i'm not gonna be around much for the next 48ish hours.
It is an informative lynch, since you're playing in a way that makes it impossible to guess your alignment.In post 904, MafiaSSK wrote:Fair enough. I do suppose lynching a lurker is a totally useful and totally informative lynch.
It is.
How do you currently feel about MafiaSSK?
In post 908, mastin2 wrote:While I think he's scum, he's far from certainly-scum, and I want us to all have time to analyze his wagon from both perspectives.
In post 2, borkjerfkin wrote:>>>Important: There are eyes and ears everywhere. Flavor Claim at your own risk in this game.<<<
Useful in that someone who's not even trying to play will not affect the rest of our gameplays in future times, and informative in that we have a wagon to analyze.In post 904, MafiaSSK wrote:Fair enough. I do suppose lynching a lurker is a totally useful and totally informative lynch.
How are you feeling about TNE's recent posts?In post 914, thezmon221 wrote:Useful in that someone who's not even trying to play will not affect the rest of our gameplays in future times, and informative in that we have a wagon to analyze.In post 904, MafiaSSK wrote:Fair enough. I do suppose lynching a lurker is a totally useful and totally informative lynch.
So I agree with you.
In post 904, MafiaSSK wrote:Fair enough. I do suppose lynching a lurker is a totally useful and totally informative lynch.
How are you feeling about TNE's recent posts?In post 915, morph the cat wrote:How are you feeling about TNE's recent posts?In post 914, thezmon221 wrote:Useful in that someone who's not even trying to play will not affect the rest of our gameplays in future times, and informative in that we have a wagon to analyze.In post 904, MafiaSSK wrote:Fair enough. I do suppose lynching a lurker is a totally useful and totally informative lynch.
So I agree with you.
Better.In post 916, Psychlone wrote:In post 904, MafiaSSK wrote:Fair enough. I do suppose lynching a lurker is a totally useful and totally informative lynch.
How are you feeling about TNE's recent posts?In post 915, morph the cat wrote:How are you feeling about TNE's recent posts?In post 914, thezmon221 wrote:Useful in that someone who's not even trying to play will not affect the rest of our gameplays in future times, and informative in that we have a wagon to analyze.In post 904, MafiaSSK wrote:Fair enough. I do suppose lynching a lurker is a totally useful and totally informative lynch.
So I agree with you.
Just in case ppl are wondering.8. Psychlone (GuyInFreezer + Nachomamma8) <- GiF seems less serious in this game than what I know of his scumgame, but that's from my one completed game with him, which isn't even on this site, so I'm not sure how accurate that even is. I was thinking he didn't seem to be actually doing much and instead just responding to things, but disengagement explains that.
In post 869, waynegg wrote:I meant what's with making japes at a legit reason to think someone's lying?In post 864, Psychlone wrote:Yes.
I'm still lost.In post 870, Psychlone wrote:You lost me there.
There are equally valid wagons to analyze where there's also content from that player to analyze as well. And votes from that player. My only vote so far has been my RVS vote, right? I give you less wagons to analyze of lower quality and when I'm gone the quality of the game won't increase by any significant margins because everyone will still be here.In post 914, thezmon221 wrote:Useful in that someone who's not even trying to play will not affect the rest of our gameplays in future times, and informative in that we have a wagon to analyze.In post 904, MafiaSSK wrote:Fair enough. I do suppose lynching a lurker is a totally useful and totally informative lynch.
So I agree with you.
Is this intentional play on your part?In post 920, MafiaSSK wrote:There are equally valid wagons to analyze where there's also content from that player to analyze as well. And votes from that player. My only vote so far has been my RVS vote, right? I give you less wagons to analyze of lower quality and when I'm gone the quality of the game won't increase by any significant margins because everyone will still be here.In post 914, thezmon221 wrote:Useful in that someone who's not even trying to play will not affect the rest of our gameplays in future times, and informative in that we have a wagon to analyze.In post 904, MafiaSSK wrote:Fair enough. I do suppose lynching a lurker is a totally useful and totally informative lynch.
So I agree with you.
ScumotivationIn post 914, thezmon221 wrote:Useful in that someone who's not even trying to play will not affect the rest of our gameplays in future times, and informative in that we have a wagon to analyze.In post 904, MafiaSSK wrote:Fair enough. I do suppose lynching a lurker is a totally useful and totally informative lynch.
So I agree with you.
Did you miss my thing about " to be honest with you" and it's variants?In post 919, Psychlone wrote:In post 869, waynegg wrote:I meant what's with making japes at a legit reason to think someone's lying?In post 864, Psychlone wrote:Yes.I'm still lost.In post 870, Psychlone wrote:You lost me there.
Help me find my way there.
thisIn post 897, morph the cat wrote:We initially called it "obvious as fuck" and I think pie is using the term ironically (i.e., he disagrees that it was obvious as fuck).
I think she's town but omfg paranoia. liking her questions and analysis of players. re: "scumslip", see above. I missed that it was a reaction test until she outright told me it was.In post 884, Mac wrote:quickly though: pieguy - opinion on morph (quick summary will do, dont make me iso because im pages behind)