In post 440, Mr. Flay wrote:
But you've been too quiet by half... where's your scumhunting, too?
I might have only half the posts of some (almost all) of the other players, but thats not something thats going to change soon, as I try to put my thoughts into 1 bigger post instead of say 4-5 smaller ones.
As for my scumhunting, I think I've been trying to do my share.
In post 443, jmo16mla wrote: In post 439, The-Duck wrote:It's the second time that you call people out for bad hammers, might be a good idea to prevent the situation
Okay. How do you suppose I stop people from voting?
By presenting a good alternative or trying to explain to people why you think that particular lynch is bad.
In post 443, jmo16mla wrote:
its just a question. Do you feel that my reaction is one from scum? Pretty simple.
It is a simple question, but it also bears no meaning.. do you feel you would have a hard time making that kind of posts as scum?
In my opinion that kind of posts are, at the very best, null.
In post 443, jmo16mla wrote:
In post 439, The-Duck wrote:Yesterday you have been defending NS without giving reasons other than "this is terrible" or "this game is anti-town!" which is also a nice way to get easy towncred
I don't think i defended NS... where does "this game is anti town" cross the line of defending someone? The game WAS anti town. we had pretty much one wagon per day, and no shifting of votes or anything. It keeps scum from having to make too many choices and screw up along the way. you follow?
I get why only one wagon per day can be/is anti town, but saying it is not helping anything, making cases on people is. and for the defending of NS:
381,
365 and somewhat in
326
In post 443, jmo16mla wrote:
Not to point a finger, but I don't really remember much of your contributions.. actually, I think the game would pretty much be the same without you.
Right, so. my scum players.. everyone. I really have everyone as much scum as others. Flay a little less.
As requested when mindgamer said the exact same thing, I'd like some tips (after this game) how to be more persuasive.
In post 452, geraintm wrote:There are only 4 people. I think 2 of you ae scum. Don't need much more of a list than that. Waiting for duck now.
No idea why others have different reads.
Considering I am a post from duck away from voting for you, you seem very calm
Why are you waiting for me to post to vote Flay? I'd prefer you wait a bit with that, it feels needlessly risky to vote now.
Do I summarize your case on flay correctly if I say you dislike him being careful after his D1 blunder?
And if I may ask, what is your opinion on Number? You two are fairly high up on the suspiscion lists, and yet you barely mention him?
