2) Guilty Conscience (psychobabble) Talked about it previously.
AKA BULLSHIT THAT YOU'RE SPEWING TO MAKE ME LOOK WORSE
This isn't really an appropriate response. You can't just say "BS" to refute an argument. Here's a primer on how word choices provide insights into the brain: http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/let ... they-speak
There are much more in depth applications. It can be very effective, until the subject (you in this case) is aware that reading of that nature is going on. (This is a big part of why I keep my cases to myself, and don't always explain my reads in great detail. These are some cool tools that I use frequently in mafia, but the more I talk about them the less effective they become with people who are aware.)
Anyway this is a failing wagon I'm out. UNVOTE: orcinus
His shitty ass AtE didn't convince me, but he's not getting lynched today, no matter how hard I try
Orcinus, when I'm a townie and its D1, it always makes me uncomfortable when somebody I haven't really interacted with much jumps into a fight with a third party to defend me. I mean, I'm a big boy... I can defend myself. Plus, that person usually doesn't have any business defending me, especially if they haven't sorted me yet (and may not have sorted the third party.)
So there was me coming at you, and two folks who clearly jumped in to discredit/debate my attack on you (AngryFratBros and MC Maraca.) Now:
1) if you're town (which we know you aren't) you'd be suspicious of two meat heads randomly defending you. Seems like good/reasonable play to me.
2) if you're scum (which you are), a reasonably good play would be to setup a lynch on either or both of the two if they were townies by feigning suspicion of their defending. It'd be an easy angle to press, especially if you had an annoying egotistical and highly suspicious player that'd help (that's me.)
But you've done neither of the above.
In this scenario/narrative above, explain what I'm missing from your perspective.
In post 1339, likeabauss wrote:1) if you're town (which we know you aren't) you'd be suspicious of two meat heads randomly defending you. Seems like good/reasonable play to me.
because your case on me is shit
We are lazy people on an adventure, flirting with life but too shy to go all the way.
In post 1339, likeabauss wrote:1) if you're town (which we know you aren't) you'd be suspicious of two meat heads randomly defending you. Seems like good/reasonable play to me.
As a townie who is only not arguing with your cases because people usually yell at him when he answers questions not directed at him, this logic is stupid.
I may just start answering things that aren't directed at me though because I'm rapidly getting sick of feeling like I'm sitting here helpless to stop these stupid wagons.
In post 1341, orcinus_theoriginal wrote:rank's meta doesn't support your claim which is why you've refused to provide it despite it being the obviously townie thing to do
so that's why you're slinging mud on me and asking me to be lynched second because when i flip town you have no excuse anymore
i've fooled myself for long enough
VOTE: bauss
Seriously bauss,
why the fuck will you not provide examples of this meta you're touting if it exists?
I mind when I get 50 trollvotes hopping on a reason that's not related to me and when I ask for actual proof for said reason nothing happens
I am not obliged, believe it or not, to do anything for this town. I am not obliged to entertain you by assuming your posts come from a place where thought actually occurs
I am honestly not enjoying myself at all right now.
We are lazy people on an adventure, flirting with life but too shy to go all the way.
