Oh. Yeah. About that.In post 1473, fferyllt wrote:Yates?
I lied. Whoops.
Lied about what??In post 1475, Yates wrote:Oh. Yeah. About that.In post 1473, fferyllt wrote:Yates?
I lied. Whoops.
Wait how much am I missing Peabody is cop?????In post 1480, CrashTextDummie wrote:Peabody, claim your results.
It's probably time to massclaim anyway.
No.In post 1477, Yates wrote:I'm guessing this shouldn't come as much of a surprise butI'm obviously not the copand was simply trying to draw the NK. I was running on a hunch that this slot had already been investigated so any real cop would know not to cc me. I also held out bonus hope that if we had a doc they would protect me. Second night phase in a row with a missing kill so maybe it worked?
At this point I'm hoping someone checked into you [Garm], fferyllt, or Peabody.
Also, sorry about trying to frame you as the doc, fferyllt. While I have a - well -not scumread on you, I'm not 100% convinced you are Town. Like... did you pay our friend Grimm a little visit last night??
I'm one-shot bullet-proof town. That's why I denied your calling me doc. If there's been a missing kill at least one of the two nights with one kill, then it's possible scum knew I couldn't be doc because it would require a self-protect.In post 1477, Yates wrote:I'm guessing this shouldn't come as much of a surprise butI'm obviously not the copand was simply trying to draw the NK. I was running on a hunch that this slot had already been investigated so any real cop would know not to cc me. I also held out bonus hope that if we had a doc they would protect me. Second night phase in a row with a missing kill so maybe it worked?
At this point I'm hoping someone checked into you [Garm], fferyllt, or Peabody.
Also, sorry about trying to frame you as the doc, fferyllt. While I have a - well -not scumread on you, I'm not 100% convinced you are Town. Like... did you pay our friend Grimm a little visit last night??
How could that possibly happen? Tell me how that makes sense for balance.In post 1483, fferyllt wrote:I hope there is a doc as well...
I dunno. x-shot? It depends on what else town has, and what scum has as well.In post 1484, Yates wrote:How could that possibly happen? Tell me how that makes sense for balance.In post 1483, fferyllt wrote:I hope there is a doc as well...
Or SK? Why would you care if scum kill an SK? And when did you start subtly hinting?In post 1474, Garmr wrote:Oh fferyllt I am going to be honest I don't have the ability to kill at night I was subtly hinting at it in my previous posts so mafia would kill me in the night phase thinking I was the Vig or SK.
Read it again please. I was hinting at being either to try and draw away from the power roles. I started as early as day two with that fake congratulating the doctor tell.In post 1489, fferyllt wrote:Or SK? Why would you care if scum kill an SK? And when did you start subtly hinting?In post 1474, Garmr wrote:Oh fferyllt I am going to be honest I don't have the ability to kill at night I was subtly hinting at it in my previous posts so mafia would kill me in the night phase thinking I was the Vig or SK.
In post 1016, Garmr wrote:Hell yeh who ever. is vig is way better at picking scum than me. I Would of shot peabody or NS.
This seems to be tying to push me to be a SK which I am not. AlsoIn post 1489, fferyllt wrote:Or SK? Why would you care if scum kill an SK? And when did you start subtly hinting?In post 1474, Garmr wrote:Oh fferyllt I am going to be honest I don't have the ability to kill at night I was subtly hinting at it in my previous posts so mafia would kill me in the night phase thinking I was the Vig or SK.
In post 1420, fferyllt wrote:Garmr's reaction to the 2nd kill on day 2 bothered me.
The main problem I have with Plum's play is that it seems to have no objective. Not in a town wandering around lost way, but more like which wagon went through on day 2 didn't really matter.
I dunno. Her play style is hard for me to process.
Intent to hammer
These posts make me believe that the Not science night kill and the Grimgrove night kill where to set me up as today's mislynch and the most likely to do that is FFerylt. Thus I conclude that FFerylt is most like to be scum followed by Yates and then if none of those are scum Spyrex.In post 1461, fferyllt wrote:I have a theory about the 2nd kill being SK and who the SK would be, but I don't want to float it in case the player is the 2nd killer but is vig.
I expect anyone would conclude similarly if we continue to see either additional kills or kills that don't look scum-motivated, so I'll leave it at that for now.
An inno just means you aren't scum. That doesn't rule out SK. Keep that in mind.In post 1493, Garmr wrote:This seems to be tying to push me to be a SK which I am not.
What did you think of my fake claim, yesterday?
In post 1132, Peabody wrote:CDB's beginning posts, as I had said previously, look conducsive to someone's alignment as scum.
In post 1242, Peabody wrote:I'm okay with SK or CDB.
In post 1254, Peabody wrote:I'm against a Plum lynch for the time being. CDB is okay, but he won't be claiming.
And your concerns are?In post 1495, Yates wrote: That said? I share your concerns regarding fferyllt.
Going to be enunciated immediately following SpyreX's full claim.In post 1497, fferyllt wrote:And your concerns are?