Marketplace Mafia III - Game Over

Harakiri · Post Post #4025 (ISO) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:23 pm

So the thing I'm getting from this skim is baldeagle was scum. Garuda too prob, I dunno. And Molla, but I'm annoyed both LB and Garuda think he's town, so he's probably town.

Garuda · Post Post #4026 (ISO) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:24 pm

I'M THE HOBO
WITH A SHOTGUN

Harakiri · Post Post #4027 (ISO) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:24 pm

In post 4024, 1baldeagle1 wrote:What?

History is important.

Lord Mhork · Post Post #4028 (ISO) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:24 pm

Yeah quilford's recent posting is giving me all sorts of bad feels about that slot.

Harakiri your reads are literally the shittiest thing I have read all day

1baldeagle1 · Post Post #4029 (ISO) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:25 pm

Molla is still a good lynch though.

Garuda · Post Post #4030 (ISO) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:25 pm

In post 4020, Quilford wrote:bbmolla it's very very obvious that you want to get into a shitfight because then everyone will forget that you were ever a giant lurker who posted nothing but crap

hey quilford bbmolla is currently wrecking you
i don't see any fire

Quilford · Post Post #4031 (ISO) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:25 pm

In post 4021, Lord Mhork wrote:Quilford, the fact that you're ignoring me severely bothers me

what are you asking me to do?

vote nero cain when bbmolla is obvious scum fmpov?

your

logic doesn't follow. and your attempts to play peacemaker are bad. please stop.

1baldeagle1 wrote:Hmm, I can't help it but I'm thinking that Quilford is bussing BBMollla.

I bring a case against Molla. Doesn't get interested.
Quilford makes a summary of my case. Molla is suddenly so interested and wants a 1v1.

i have not read anything you have said about bbmolla. pretty promise with sugar on top.

Quilford · Post Post #4032 (ISO) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:26 pm

In post 4030, Garuda wrote:
In post 4020, Quilford wrote:bbmolla it's very very obvious that you want to get into a shitfight because then everyone will forget that you were ever a giant lurker who posted nothing but crap
hey quilford bbmolla is currently wrecking you
i don't see any fire

there's no fire. just amusement. exasperation.

this is nacho, right?

1baldeagle1 · Post Post #4033 (ISO) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:27 pm

Why didn't you read it?

Garuda · Post Post #4034 (ISO) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:27 pm

Of course it's nacho.

Garuda · Post Post #4035 (ISO) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:27 pm

And you're correct there is no fire, but I can't say that I see the amusement/exasperation emotions shining through.

Lord Mhork · Post Post #4036 (ISO) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:28 pm

Actually I asked why you weren't voting Nero. You responded with complete irrelevance. I hate the way you're approaching molla and I hate the way you're approaching me. I don't think it's too far a stretch to say you're being bully scum trying for more cheap MLs

Also I find it rather interesting you note that Nero is scum

from your point of view

. Why did you say that?

Garuda · Post Post #4037 (ISO) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:31 pm

In post 4036, Lord Mhork wrote:that BBMolla is scum from your point of view. Why did you say that?

fixed but not a bad catch

Quilford · Post Post #4038 (ISO) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:33 pm

In post 4033, 1baldeagle1 wrote:Why didn't you read it?

because i didn't see it. surely the fact that i posted my own 'case' instead of attributing my vote to your case makes that obvious?

Lord Mhork wrote:Actually I asked why you weren't voting Nero. You responded with complete irrelevance.

the fact that i only have one vote isn't really irrelevant

Lord Mhork wrote:I hate the way you're approaching molla and I hate the way you're approaching me.

can you elaborate

Lord Mhork wrote:Also I find it rather interesting you note that Nero is scum
from your point of view
. Why did you say that?

i did not say anything of the sort.

Quilford · Post Post #4039 (ISO) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:36 pm

In post 4035, Garuda wrote:And you're correct there is no fire, but I can't say that I see the amusement/exasperation emotions shining through.

that's a shame.

maybe turn on the tv and watch a few episodes of house if you're looking for that

Garuda · Post Post #4040 (ISO) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:36 pm

In post 4031, Quilford wrote:vote nero cain when bbmolla is obvious scum fmpov?

he's talking about this obv
just got some Nero on the mind

geists · Post Post #4041 (ISO) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:38 pm

In post 4028, Lord Mhork wrote:Harakiri your reads are literally the shittiest thing I have read all day

And you're a paragon of greatness.

Harakiri · Post Post #4042 (ISO) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:38 pm

In post 4041, geists wrote:
In post 4028, Lord Mhork wrote:Harakiri your reads are literally the shittiest thing I have read all day
And you're a paragon of greatness.

Me.

Lord Mhork · Post Post #4043 (ISO) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:39 pm

I meant molla

You're telling me to shut up and I really didn't like the feel of your case on him. Especially the fact that it was a terrible 'OMG revelation he's conf scum guize!' Style.

I asked why you weren't voting Nero, you responded with molla is scum. You didn't explain or elaborate or anything.

PEDIT:
I am aware. Now get your shit together and find real scum. Eagle is so painfully town it hurts.

Garuda · Post Post #4044 (ISO) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:39 pm

In post 4039, Quilford wrote:
In post 4035, Garuda wrote:And you're correct there is no fire, but I can't say that I see the amusement/exasperation emotions shining through.
that's a shame.

maybe turn on the tv and watch a few episodes of house if you're looking for that

would love to, but I'm too poor to afford cable
my dad kicked me out of his house at a young age because i cried once
now i sit in a mcdonalds on a stolen laptop using the free wifi trolling these forums for signs of emotion, just so I know it's ok to feel things
i lynch people who don't feel things as a way to get back at my father, and apparently that means i'm good at this game?
or something

BBmolla · Post Post #4045 (ISO) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:40 pm

In post 4023, 1baldeagle1 wrote:Hmm, I can't help it but I'm thinking that Quilford is bussing BBMollla.

I bring a case against Molla. Doesn't get interested.
Quilford makes a summary of my case. Molla is suddenly so interested and wants a 1v1.

The difference is that you're probably derp town

Quilford · Post Post #4046 (ISO) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:41 pm

'fmpov' just removing the ambiguity of saying 'bbmolla is obvious scum' when he's clearly not to everyone

Garuda wrote:
In post 4039, Quilford wrote: that's a shame.

maybe turn on the tv and watch a few episodes of house if you're looking for that
would love to, but I'm too poor to afford cable
my dad kicked me out of his house at a young age because i cried once
now i sit in a mcdonalds on a stolen laptop using the free wifi trolling these forums for signs of emotion, just so I know it's ok to feel things
i lynch people who don't feel things as a way to get back at my father, and apparently that means i'm good at this game?
or something

hmm

Lord Mhork · Post Post #4047 (ISO) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:41 pm

Townies don't care about that though.

Quilford · Post Post #4048 (ISO) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:43 pm

In post 4043, Lord Mhork wrote:You're telling me to shut up

your interjections were really irritating

In post 4043, Lord Mhork wrote:and I really didn't like the feel of your case on him. Especially the fact that it was a terrible 'OMG revelation he's conf scum guize!' Style.

it kind of was a revelation, i had literally just returned to this game after a fortnight long absence and i hadn't even considered bbmolla before, n and i wrote him off as town in the early game

Lord Mhork · Post Post #4049 (ISO) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 4:45 pm

Also it's very interesting that you felt like you needed to remove ambiguity. Why?

PEDIT:
How were my interjections annoying? Also who the fuck are you to tell me to shut up?

I don't care. Revelations are sketch as all hell, especially when you start pushing them like you know they are 100% correct. Most 180s have at least a shadow of doubt.