I was starting to have a number of issues and doubts about Garmr. This has then come along and clubbed those issues and doubts and kicked them back into the dark corners of my mind. Nuts for everyone!In post 1165, Garmr wrote:eek we are both online and you seem to have trouble reading me want some clarification?
I'm still interested in a Wake lynch, he has basically shut down all scumhunting and gone full defensive mode, and it's a defensive mode that seems utterly unaware of what has happened before which feels pretty iffy to me. I'll admit that last part is gut-based because I actually cannot think of a reason scum would be more likely to pretend not getting MME's point than town would, but it still feels like it has to be faked and therefore scummy simply because I really can't believe that Wake doesn't understand what MME's issue with him is/was because MME has been screaming (and boldly bolding) it for almost every post of their exchange. I'll also admit the constant appeals to how tough his days are rub me the wrong way, if life is tough enough that he can't play the game, he should replace out, if the game is still fun to him and he has time to post then he should be able to play it. I don't really feel like there is an allowed third category where you're playing but are allowed to play really bad and it shouldn't be considered scummy because, hey, your life is busy.
@TvK + ICEninja - you guys seem to be the strong holdouts of Kid A scum. With that as a belief, and with what just happened to that wagon, which votes do you find suspect? Do you think a Kid A scum wagon was dismantled onto a Wake scum wagon, or a Wake town wagon? And, if so, what do you think of the people whose votes moved?
I'm not sure why you brought it up then, was there a question you wanted answered about it?In post 1172, penguin_alien wrote:SG, my issue was that the statement seemed demoralizing. I don't mind it so much at this point because you didn't use it as an excuse to completely disengage.