Meh.In post 191, Kalimar wrote:Prod dodge, back tomorrow.
Sort of like the L-2 vote to prompt a reaction from Wake.
Null.
Meh.In post 191, Kalimar wrote:Prod dodge, back tomorrow.
In post 146, Zebe wrote:@DBK: I find 34 interesting. Kalimar is just visiting here to vote Wake (to -2 as he mentioned). It's also nice you remember me...
@ETL:
Null: Mr_Blonde, Smudger and aptil because almost nothing to read.
Scummy: Gam and Kalimar leaning scum (more or less) because I cannot see reasoning behind some of their votes except wagoning.
Nothing: KBW, simply no posts...
I didn't include either Cheery Dog or lucky, I'm not decided where to put them yet.
I could vote Zebe for these two posts.In post 163, Zebe wrote:@Lucky and ETL:
To clarify:
Null is 'no useful or very useless activity'
Nothing is 'no activity to even start with'
And the uncategorized category is 'a slight idea, but nothing major'
I'm sorry if this confuzzles you, but that just happens sometimes. I'm not sure if it's me giving more mainstream names to my obscure categories, translation mistakes or something completely different.
@DBK: I don't feel this is 100% out of RVS yet. Half of the players are under 10 posts and something. I consider RVS more than just "random" stage of the game (None of the votes arenever trulyrandom). My "RVS" is can be described as the time to get the game rolling properly. Like in the scum/null/nothing/wth case above, lines I draw are never straight.
Kalimar & gam, who's scummier? With only 1 post from K, I have to choose gam. That contradiction with 114 and 115.
Yeah it gives him an out if/when I flip town.In post 397, BBmolla wrote:Zebe randomly saying one of top 4 posters is scum and then voting one is scummy as shit.
DBK do you think the two might the related? really is there a slight possibility? Nice cover though.In post 237, Does Bo Know wrote:I wanna say about 70% of the times I'm called scum when I'm town, I'm accused of it because of buddying.
I did noticeIn post 404, Mr_Blonde wrote:Also, you'll notice me addressing his new-found infatuation in 395.
Bo, seriously? I don't see anyone "echoing"what you are saying, unless of course that is an echo of your echo of them......In post 405, Does Bo Know wrote:And echo things I have been saying
Yep DBK is still scum.In post 394, Does Bo Know wrote:^^^^THIS guy knows what's up.
Nope.In post 407, Cheery Dog wrote:Yep DBK is still scum.In post 394, Does Bo Know wrote:^^^^THIS guy knows what's up.
Looks like you need to make a new friend since etl noticed your sheeping.
Point me to themIn post 403, Smudger wrote:BB and others there were some minor questions for you in my big post.
In post 410, BBmolla wrote:Point me to themIn post 403, Smudger wrote:BB and others there were some minor questions for you in my big post.
although the second part is an observation not a questionIn post 281, Smudger wrote:62 BB, would agree with this in that it is not relevant to his alignment. But a question came to mind, Wake is not a Newbie and so his reaction could be controlled could it not?
67 BB, this at the time of reading is a true statement but It is a gamble all the same and DBK does cover this in his post 68 and again in 85 but then I want to tie this into later observations regarding DBK.
I was not mis-representing you . This post came after #97 where you mention you are caught up to this game but you did not think any of that was woth any content and instead go back to random voting . Even if it was sarcasm or whatever , we were not in random stage by then and you deciding to have us go to random votes seemed silly to me .In post 125, Lucky2u wrote:Your taking that wholly out of context and THAT is bad. Are you just trying to misrep me or did you skim the interaction between me and ETL instead of reading it?In post 121, aptil wrote:#98 is so bad Lucky . There is enough content for you to comment on . Instead you go and do a random vote .
Well my vote was on wake in the random stage . The reaction of Wake on the cop gambit was way cool than i have seen him play before . Even if he knew the thing was fake he had too many votes on him and i have seen him blow up when he gets that close to a lynch as a townie . To me that did not make me think he was town automatically so my vote remained unchanged . So i didn't think i needed to change my RVS vote at that time .In post 254, Mr_Blonde wrote:Jesus fuck this is a ton of stuff to slog through.
UNVOTE: BB
Originally I didn't buy the N0 Cop claim considering the Wiki says PRs will be designated randomly for Nights 1-5. Additionally, why add the further pressure of a guilty viewing to a player that was already gaining a few RVS votes? Anyway, he reads better from where I stopped.
Liking ETL. Where are you from btw? I posted this morning and since have been busy, but alas I am home. Technically it's still 'tonight' as I said I would be posting earlier.
On re-read Lucky stands out for the dice-roller vote thing. Aptil's response to it I didn't like much considering he was attacking Lucky for not voting someone based on the previous content when he hadn't as well. VOTE: aptil
I give-up on the re-read. I'll be more active now that I'm back with my laptop and my schedule will be considerably less busy for the time being.
What gives you the scum read on DBK?In post 407, Cheery Dog wrote:Yep DBK is still scum.In post 394, Does Bo Know wrote:^^^^THIS guy knows what's up.
Looks like you need to make a new friend since etl noticed your sheeping.
Skimming, I noticed this.In post 417, Kalimar wrote: I need to put some effort in to reading the higher volume posters at some point, but I can already tell with Wake it's going to be hard.
One more thing that should be noted is that, of all my posts, less than 5 are large. That's the problem with his comment.In post 422, Mr_Blonde wrote:That's a skewed number considering PCs don't also count the number of characters in said posts.
@ Wake - Did you see my question in 383?