Not to set ProHawk off again, but of the two, I'm more inclined to vote eagle than Harakiri (I'm a lot more paranoid of Harakiri today than yesterday, both because I'm afraid I'm stupid for giving them the benefit of the doubt re: their lack of submission last night and because a few things they said earlier in the QT pinged me--also don't really like how rigid their reads are--but all in all, their reaction to pressure has looked genuine and they've done some stuff this game like their use of Wage Freeze that makes me reluctant to vote them).In post 4815, uʍop ǝpısdn wrote:Lost Butterfly, what do you think about our two top wagons?
(BBmolla, what QT stuff of mine in particular "solidifies" your read for you, considering I haven't shared most of it? Also, is there anyone here who's interested in a paraphrase of the neighbourhood QT? Otherwise, I won't bother.)
But right now, I'm leaning elsewhere.
All right. Upside down, why don't you send your second message to ProHawk today?In post 4786, ProHawk wrote:This is dumb. Messenger gets a 2x use.In post 4780, Lost Butterfly wrote:I want concrete proof that you haven't sent one today. If you can't provide this despite having claimed not to have sent one, then you're busted.
Hey, ProHawk. Why didn't you say anything when I asked upside down to send me a message while you were around and posting? I'd have expected you to insist he send it to someone else, particularly given your paranoid partnership theories and your reaction to my neighbourizing Harakiri. But you said nothing and just waited until after the message was sent to use it as an excuse to scumread me.
...In post 4787, ProHawk wrote:See LB, its these crazy lets use the game mechanics to clear people/scum hunt that just makes me think you are scum.
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH! AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!
*bashes head against a wall*
DO YOU REALIZE THAT'S ACTUALLY A
Sure, this player claimed a role that would be useful for scum. But hey, let's not make it any more difficult for them to USE it as scum. Because hahahaha, using game mechanics to solve the game is pathetic and scummy!
Just like massclaim, which everyone agreed should happen but which never happened because no one could be assed to start it, and now it's too late! And that protown breaking strategy that everyone was supposed to follow, but which we're NOT following, because hey, let's just post a completely different plan right before deadline and then never follow up on it just to cause more confusion. And just never say one way or another whether we transferred money to the people we were supposed to, or just say we didn't bother to follow the plan (but also didn't bother to suggest an improved one), because everyone in the game will townread us for it!