In post 4876, Garuda wrote:This is also a surprising question coming from someone who was getting paranoid of my attempts to quicklynch Nero.
There's a difference between voting to quicklynch someone immediately at the start of the day and voting to (quick)lynch someone after most of the day has passed and we've done everything we care to do at the time. The former serves no purpose, especially when there were things that should've been done before anyone was lynched (even if one of them never happened). With the latter there is at least some way of making a better informed decision, and in context without something like, say, the person(s) who double-governed Nero outing him/her/themselves the most that's delaying the lynch is our inability to finalize one.
In post 4879, Nero Cain wrote:The idea of me being confirmed scum is absolutely ludacris. My role pm is green so unless the mod made a mistake them I'm town.
That is a horrible argument.
also, "ludicrous." Ludacris is the stage name of a rapper.
In post 4884, Lost Butterfly wrote:Do you see why the beginning of this post and the end (as well as your eagerness for us to quicklynch eagle right now without more deliberation) don't fit together? Particularly since you'd been in the "Don't quicklynch Nero before massclaim!" camp, like Garuda said.
By all means, talk some more if you feel like there's stuff still worth talking about, but my mind has hit the point of going "fuck this, let's just get this done with". Eagle or Pro, or whatever, but pick somebody from those two (or I suppose Penguin) and stick with it.
Also, saying that D5 and during the first couple RL days of D6 before anyone had really vocalized anything about a massclaim in the thread is a different scenario than saying it after the idea of a massclaim has been bandied around and largely ignored and people haved talked. Notably because it
was
talked about and people
talked
, as opposed to Garuda's idea of foregoing any talking or idea-sharing in favor of lynching the shit out of Nero. And correct me if I'm wrong, but the most I'd be doing by getting Eagle lynched now is...I guess not allowing everyone the last word before what may be the last day of this game? And I suppose a couple conundrums you or anyone else has that may not be properly covered/cleared up postgame.
In post 4884, Lost Butterfly wrote:Also, your "brief fit of paranoia" seemed completely out of nowhere and unsubstantiated by anything you actually mentioned in the thread.
'Twas largely late-night bathroom paranoia, if that makes any sense. I can explain if it doesn't.
In post 4886, Lost Butterfly wrote:I mean, if you think the eagle lynch is not the optimal one, why are you eager for it to happen right now?
Eagle or Pro are the optimal lynches to me, I'd just prefer if Pro went before Eagle.
In post 4892, Garuda wrote:Townie wins night kill for $1 against a scum that seems to organize competently and happens to be investigated to have bought the night kill is a weird as fuck situation. Why did you do it? So Mhork has an excuse for having less money than he has/a registered action and so you get the "oh, I have the night kill but we still have time" cred. One situation seems a hell of a lot likelier than the other.
is that "and" supposed to be an "or" or did you accidentally the other situation? This quote doesn't make much sense since you only mention one possibility (and one that I think Mina-scum would be absolutely pants-on-head retarded to try given the hydra's position in the game).
