Hmm.
Muffin, your thoughts on the Voided wagon?
Garuda, why didn't you find the penguin wagon that exciting in
this post? What changed your mind?
Garuda wrote:What does people being passive about the top two wagons have to do with anything? I will acknowledge that Voided has fell off a bit since earlier days, but I wouldn't call his stances meatless and I wouldn't say that he's completely disengaged from the game and stopped giving a shit ala Mhork who stopped doing anything since being the mouthpiece for Pyro.
Thanks for the Mhork townread!
What I said about Mhork is because Mhork went from "oh Nero is scum as hell, let's lynch" to "no no he's town". Voided was also aggressively against him, but his flip wasn't as dramatic as Mhorks. Voided also contradicts himself constantly in a way that looks like he doesn't give a shit about what he's saying anymore, and I would expect him to at least monitor his quotes in order to make sure that he's playing consistently, somewhat. He also has a nice moment where he gets paranoid on me when i act weird, where he makes a small push on you... voided is still trying to figure the game out. Mhrok isn't.
I didn't like how all the lazy votes were falling onto eagle and Harakiri, and thought it might be nice to shake things up a bit. Also, effort and innocence are not always correlated. Mhork may be posting less, but what he does say
feels
more genuine and passionate than Voided. Examples of times Voided has contradicted himself in a townish way? If anything, that's what I'd consider Mhork's paranoid Nero defence and then petulant Nero vote when people ignored him. (Voided just seems to have a lack of focus in his scumhunting. And I'd like his paranoia of me a lot more if he'd followed up on it.)
(And I knew you'd have that reaction to my Mhork read, but tough, I'm not going to pretend he's not townie just to deprive your conspiracy theory of more fodder.)
@Mhork: the reason not to discuss my target in the thread is Countermeasures.
