My "weakness" is not handing out townreads over what looked like a scum-motivated gambit at worst and a complete mess at best.In post 425, Kazekirimaru wrote:F-16 probably sees Pasch's weakness and that explains why he's jumping on the chance to vote him in 406. Can I get "Desperate Attempt to Counterwagon" for 500, Alex?
Because it was bad and full of OMGUS.In post 432, BROseidon wrote:Also, why aren't you questioning why the Pasch wagon lost steam?
So make a decent case on Pie.#2 feels more true to me, especially given that Pie put out bs reasons against me, and people called it "good reasoning" despite it being clearly based on a misrep of what I said.
And yet you're not explaining things well enough to convince anyone. Your thoughts are incredibly disorganized. Hence, puking out thoughts that don't go together.In post 448, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:HOW THE FUCK ARE MY RESPONSES SHIT? YOU ARE A FUCKING MORON. I EXPLAINED EVERYTHING OVER AND OVER AND YOU ARE STILL NOT GETTING IT.
That's what I said before, but no one wanted to hear it.In post 461, BROseidon wrote:Kagami just tipped her hand.
She's either a lot less good that people have been giving her credit for, or she's scum trying to protect a buddy.
Someone gets it!In post 471, BROseidon wrote:This fits nicely into the narrative of scum-Kagami gambiting and trying to discredit me catching onto why something she hoped would be an auto-towntell isn't actually a town tell.
I actually like everything in here. Plum is right on every point. Kagami's whole gambit really did rely on setup knowledge that she didn't have. Whether it was an intentional deception or a mistake seems to be the real crux.In post 475, Plum wrote:Don't get me wrong, this occurred to me as a definite possibility. I waited to see her response while she might still have had confidence in my Townread on her. I'm not particularly impressed?
Kagami - are you really that sure scum had no information about the Weak modifier? As in, does your PM give you direct reason to believe that? Nothing in-thread suggests that they didn't. Even if the risk isn't small, your Broscum read rests on the assumption that Town-Bro wouldn't see it this way or wouldn't call out a mechanic or setup element that didn't make sense from a balance perspective.Ididn't think it made much sense to assume that; I only did because your confidence implied you had information in your Role PM that indicated that scum didn't know. I just can't fathom why you think this is a good argument, which gives me at least some pause. Bro - you may be right. Hm. Really not sure here. It would explain one thing that didn't make sense - why did Kagami out what Weak meant so easily when Bert didn't get it? What was gained for the Town by doing that? It was a piece of information that could always be explained later if it turned out that it was necessary e.g. if people kept running Bert up after all that.
I don't want to be too condescending here but I'll take the risk. I'm not here to referee theory fights that people get worked up about, take too personally or seriously, and vote on. Or maybe I am, but I'd rather people didn't make me spend my energy on it. This exactly what Towndoes notneed.
Stop voting people because they piss you off, because I don't want to have to clean up the mess.
Also F-16 needs to chill out.
So then why did you misrepresent this as actual knowledge, rather than a guess?In post 479, Kagami wrote:No, there was no special reason to believe they wouldn't have known about it beyond my own experience reading games.
He reads to me like Thor or Majiffy. They just want town to follow them. They do this as town and as scum. I would be careful giving Kaze townpoints. You can end up tricking yourself and confusing leadership with actually being on the side of town.In post 484, pieguyn wrote:@anyone:does anyone know how to read Kaze? if so what are your reads on him?
On the contrary, Kagami went along with everyone else's "what's a weak miller" and asked for more weak claims... and only then addressed the idea that weak didn't mean what it normally does. Maybe you don't don't see the malicious intent like I do, but no part of what I said was a misrepresentation.In post 497, Plum wrote:Kaze: Pasche literally and directly misrepped Kagami. He stated that she pretended that Weak meant Normal Weak even though she knew that wasn't true - but sheneverdid so; from the beginning she stated clearly that itwasn'tNormal Weak. So, besides an outright lie and a bunch of fallacious accusations that I lied -
And then you said this, which actually IS a lie:
You don't know that. And asserting it as a fact when it's a guess as best and a lie at worst only made Kagami's gambit worse for everyone.In post 180, Plum wrote:This isn't even remotely plausible. Scum don't and can't have the Weak modifier; they are Weak by default.
-------
Up until this last post, I was starting to turn around on Plum, but I really can't shake that she and Kagami are trying really hard to cover each other's backs.
I genuinely think it was a scum-motivated gambit to get out a lot of information about roles that was far more beneficial to scum than it was to town. That is the strongest indicator I see from this day and arguing about the current wagons has just mucked it up. I'm not gonna compromise onto a weaker read when I'm so sure about this one.
As noted above, some of you see it, too. Bro and Plum do. Kaze could if he checked his ego a little. Make scum pay for trying to trick us.
VOTE: Kagami