Yet Another Dance of the Title Fairy: Change Up

Psyche · Post Post #2825 (ISO) » Sun Jan 05, 2014 5:36 pm

In post 2823, Tamuz wrote:nah, the reference to you insisting you're unassailably correct on subjective issues is key.

I never do that.

RichardGHP · Post Post #2826 (ISO) » Sun Jan 05, 2014 5:37 pm

Sureeee

Brandi · Post Post #2827 (ISO) » Sun Jan 05, 2014 7:12 pm

In post 2820, quadz08 wrote:I'd prefer
but you're wrongg

I like this too. Mine is also a reference to popular macro images used in arguments on image boards, such as:

It's what I personally picture every time Psyche expresses an opposing thought.

The "objectively" one is okay but Psyche obviously doesn't like it

sirdanilot · Post Post #2828 (ISO) » Tue Jan 07, 2014 11:26 am

who else things psyche doesn't deserve a title just yet? I couldn't bear seeing any title in which three of the same letters occur consecutively EVERY SINGLE TIME HE POSTS

* raises hand*

sirdanilot · Post Post #2829 (ISO) » Tue Jan 07, 2014 11:28 am

In post 2820, quadz08 wrote:I'd prefer
but you're wrongg

though this happens to be the better of the bunch because only two g's

still I prefer Mafia Scum

Umbrage · Post Post #2830 (ISO) » Wed Jan 08, 2014 5:40 am

this is pretty much the same idea I had for Tamuz

and really when I think of 'argumentative poster' Psyche is one of the last to come to mind

Who · Post Post #2831 (ISO) » Wed Jan 08, 2014 11:42 am

Nominate everyone on Mafiascum for "I'm right and you're wrong." or something similar.

I propose that this, or something similar, replaces the default "Mafia Scum" title, or possibly that it be given after more posts than are required for "Mafia Scum".
This site has a tendency to attract argumentative people, and also a tendency to only keep argumentative people. Giving a title to anyone for it would be like giving them a title for playing mafia, if anything it would be the people who don't argue who need a title.

Tamuz · Post Post #2832 (ISO) » Wed Jan 08, 2014 3:59 pm

The comment is more on how psyche argues rather than that Psyche argues.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #2833 (ISO) » Wed Jan 08, 2014 4:11 pm

That title works for me

Brandi · Post Post #2834 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2014 12:55 am

In post 2832, Tamuz wrote:The comment is more on how psyche argues rather than that Psyche argues.

Mr. Flay · Post Post #2835 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2014 2:49 am

Still not all that unique IMO.

Umbrage · Post Post #2836 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2014 6:08 am

In post 2834, Brandi wrote:
In post 2832, Tamuz wrote:The comment is more on how psyche argues rather than that Psyche argues.

but aside from the multiple letter thinggg I don't see how it's specific to Psyche - I don't read it and think "yup that's definitely Psyche and only Psyche" which is what a title should do

I'm not saying it's awful, but we've barely discussed it. This isn't a case of "holy shit just give this dude a title already so everyone will shut up about it", so there's no reason we should settle for something so bland.

Kublai Khan · Post Post #2837 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2014 7:12 am

In post 2831, Who wrote:This site has a tendency to attract argumentative people, and also a tendency to only keep argumentative people.

No it doesn't.

Psyche · Post Post #2838 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2014 7:38 am

something else will probably come up at some point

Nobody Special · Post Post #2839 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2014 7:45 am

In post 2837, Kublai Khan wrote:
In post 2831, Who wrote:This site has a tendency to attract argumentative people, and also a tendency to only keep argumentative people.
No it doesn't.

Yes, it does.

xtopherusD · Post Post #2840 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2014 8:45 am

In post 2839, Nobody Special wrote:
In post 2837, Kublai Khan wrote:
In post 2831, Who wrote:This site has a tendency to attract argumentative people, and also a tendency to only keep argumentative people.
No it doesn't.
Yes, it does.

You're both wrong!

Psyche · Post Post #2841 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2014 9:08 am

But...principle of noncontradiction...

Venmar · Post Post #2842 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2014 9:10 am

In post 2831, Who wrote:
Nominate everyone on Mafiascum for "I'm right and you're wrong." or something similar.
I propose that this, or something similar, replaces the default "Mafia Scum" title, or possibly that it be given after more posts than are required for "Mafia Scum".
This site has a tendency to attract argumentative people, and also a tendency to only keep argumentative people. Giving a title to anyone for it would be like giving them a title for playing mafia, if anything it would be the people who don't argue who need a title.

please no

Mr. Flay · Post Post #2843 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2014 9:12 am

Man, we really need that sarcasm font.

saulres · Post Post #2844 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2014 9:22 am

In post 2831, Who wrote:it would be the people who don't argue who need a title.

I agree with you.

And with everything everyone else has said in this thread. And across the site.

Jake from State Farm · Post Post #2845 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2014 9:51 am

In post 2843, Mr. Flay wrote:Man, we really need that sarcasm font.

This is supposedly the Sarcasm font. I would not assume sarcasm if I saw this

quadz08 · Post Post #2846 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2014 12:42 pm

In post 2843, Mr. Flay wrote:Man, we really need that sarcasm font.

NUH UH

Umbrage · Post Post #2847 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2014 2:34 pm

this font is super good and incredibly useful, I'm going to use it a lot

Brandi · Post Post #2848 (ISO) » Thu Jan 09, 2014 3:13 pm

In post 2836, Umbrage wrote:
In post 2834, Brandi wrote:
In post 2832, Tamuz wrote:The comment is more on how psyche argues rather than that Psyche argues.
but aside from the multiple letter thinggg I don't see how it's specific to Psyche - I don't read it and think "yup that's definitely Psyche and only Psyche" which is what a title should do

I'm not saying it's awful, but we've barely discussed it. This isn't a case of "holy shit just give this dude a title already so everyone will shut up about it", so there's no reason we should settle for something so bland.

Well I tried. Guess most people don't see it as fitting which is fair, that is the point of this thread after all!

Someday, Psyche.

Oversoul · Post Post #2849 (ISO) » Tue Jan 14, 2014 6:42 pm

Only thing I can think of for Psyche is "too smart for his own good"

Possibly too long