I actually support ika lynch very much.In post 255, RayFrost wrote:Unvote, Vote: RobinWilliams
I am clearly never going to get support for the ika lynch because everyone just sees it as his ~playstyle~ (I really reallyreallyhate how much my games have been "rayfrost made a good case but it's untrue because it's ~playstyle~" lately).
And I am willing to vote here for [Reasons].
Unvote, vote:ika
(Bcj and ika are both scum to me)Ika: He's willing to put someone at l-1 without the majority agreeing. That's an extremely stupid and risky decision
unless
he's scum.In post 88, ika wrote:Spoiler: all the post from pg 4 so farPost 16 is why I had an early town slot on bjc, his awareness of my pregame post made me think he is town because i figured scums don't care about that stuff and would not pay attention. He was obviously aware of my pre-game post. The only other reason would be is if we were both scums, however i am not. It is possible that he is but right now its null-town coming from him atm.In post 79, emeraldemon wrote:Hey so you wanted to see my town game right? Let's do this thing
So one thing makes me hesitate about bjc / ika scumteam: 16 it would surprise me a little for a scum to draw attention to a partner like this in the first post.
Other than that though, pretty much everything from them has felt scumteam.
The only other person who's posted anything is Abbott, but unfortunately it's all pretty null. Need more stuff from everyone.
Heres a good post, he trying to spark some discussion and trying to get reads on people here. I am starting to get irked by the big buddying of him and the votes on me. But its feels more genuine. One of the few things that makes me wonder is he wants contents from people but does not give contents of his own. I gave a good few questions for discussion but he has yet to answer them when he said he would.In post 80, bjc wrote:How about stuff from you? What's with your vote on ika? What do you make of Robw's vote on ika?
To me this is 2 prong. This gives me more confidence in emerald being town due to you having experience with him. I didn't glance at his game because I was lazy but due to biassed reasons I am considering you town and will take that emerald is town.In post 81, TierShift wrote:He did that last game and coasted to a win as scumIn post 23, Nachomamma8 wrote:Thanks for the link!
I'm probably not going to read it; just be obviously town and we will get along just fine.
Early game reads:
emerald town: is putting himself much more in the spotlights than he did in his scumgame+feels genuine.
Ika town: really trying to hunt but well...uh walling is not necessary. Great to see someone try, though.
Not seeing much scummy intent anywhere yet but I might reread some more.
VOTE: nacho
Get out of spectator mode.
Your reasoning for nacho seems also valid that if he is merely coasting and seems to be doing right now. It is becoming annoying and not helpful. He seems to be trying to take a null path. I first took it as IC trying to play neutral but looking back even as an IC should not coast like he is.
This post gives me more confidence in you being town because of the second half thats addressed to tiershift. I do think you are sligtly stuck in the me and bjc buddying, but i am going to take it as a newbie thing. If one of us were to flip scum, then you should follow up on it. However there is also a flip-side that a scum will buddy with a strong town read to try to get them out. However I say that our "buddying" is more just general chat and discussion.In post 82, emeraldemon wrote:@bjc
I made a long post about why I voted ika (59), did you read it?
Yes, Robb W needs to come out and post.
@tiershift
Man, I really hope you are town this game. So you don't think ika and bjc are buddying?
This gives me a good town read from you, you jump right in and start asking questions and want to obviously discuss things. You are obviously a player who has a few games under your belt and knows what you are doing.In post 83, TierShift wrote:Nah, ika is town. Just look at the total lack of self-conciousness.
As for bjc buddying, define buddying.
Bjc, you got any experience? Sure seems like you do. Why do you think emerald is scum?
Abbott, why do you say wagons are the way out of RVS, then place a lone vote?
This post gives me a better understanding of how you play and what i should expect from you. It helps when I know what i should be expecting. Seeing how you only have 3-4 games played. You seems to have a good start. There are a few things that I do think you could improve on thoguh. But I will save that for post gameIn post 84, bjc wrote:That didn't really look like a justification for voting but more like a, "hey guys, check this out."In post 82, emeraldemon wrote:@bjc
I made a long post about why I voted ika (59), did you read it?
Yes, Robb W needs to come out and post.
@tiershift
Man, I really hope you are town this game. So you don't think ika and bjc are buddying?
Oh and yes I'd say that it looks like we're buddying. I can't say he's confirmed townie to me but I'm not the best at that.Yes. I originate from a sports-based website where I've played 3 or 4 games, then made my way here.In post 83, TierShift wrote:
Bjc, you got any experience? Sure seems like you do. Why do you think emerald is scum?
Admittedly, it's something small, but it struck me as something awful:Note: I'm not one to call someone's play "bad" or call people names and pull some high-rank crap because I think that's annoying and I think people who make the "that post was so bad" kind of posts either:
-Can't properly explain what's wrong with the post
-or-
-Are 14 years old.
So why do I say this? To clarify that my use of awful was to describe how it jumped out at me, not that the substance was awful.
In post 85, TierShift wrote:It awfully jumps out at you, but the substance isn't awful. Why is it scummy again?
If you want a wagon, vote nacho, IC wagons are cool.this puts nacho at l-2.In post 86, bjc wrote:Well at the time it seemed scummy, almost OMGUS in nature but ika voted for nacho, not emeral.In post 85, TierShift wrote:It awfully jumps out at you, but the substance isn't awful. Why is it scummy again?
If you want a wagon, vote nacho, IC wagons are cool.
Cool.unvote; vote: nacho
VOTE: nacho
this is l-1, his coasting nature and trying to stay null at first looked like to me as an IC play but is more biassed of a reason and he should actually not be doing so and legitimately coming out to help. Also after ISOing him, his post stick out to me as scum for what they say.
