Are you kidding me? I was keeping a good pace with the game, and even I don't want to go back to re-read D1. D1 was full of noise, and the only "scum hunting" there was Mollie pushing Nacho, and me trying to get her to ease off as well as, simultaneously getting a wagon on Mala/rach and even trying to compromise on you when I saw that it wasn't going to happen. everyone else was posting for the sake of postingIn post 1572, Rancid Broderick Drake wrote:Nae, it wasn't.Athena wrote:yesterday was full of noise
And I don't know why ye'd think this.
Have ye not gone back and looked at the wagon that developed on ye? Have ye not gone back and looked at who was saying what about the Nacho lynch and how that happened? Considering ye were apparently catching up on the thread for most of this day phase, I would have thought ye were paying close attention to these things.
There was _some_ noise, but full of noise? Nae.
Really?In post 1574, Rancid Broderick Drake wrote:If we be using this logic, you're scum for not recognising why Nacho was town?In post 1569, Athenas Fury wrote:because if you were town, you'd recognize why I'm town and you're trying to discount the obvious. Hence scum.
I don't believe you believe this is a reasonable line of thought, and I don't believe this is meant to be anything other than manipulative.
Tammy expecting people who have played with her before to know her town-play when they see it, when she is town while being unable to read those she has played with before isn't anything new.
And? She even had a moment of doubt of nacho-scum, but there were people yelling nacho-scum, and not much of a defense from people who thought he was town outside of me. PFR apparently thought Nacho was town, but they've done crap about it, you've done crap to dissuade the wagon, no one has and it's pretty hard to drop a scum-read when there are others around you agreeing with you.
also? Tammy is pretty well known to have a transparent town game. Nacho? not so much
here is what I wanted you to answer, and it has nothing to do with mala/rach other than the opportunity to persuade me to drop it.In post 1499, Generically Purple wrote:and you know I am anything but, Nati.In post 1488, Rancid Broderick Drake wrote:I worry ye be really naive. Really, really naive.
I mean, you HAVE heard my stance on AtE vs emotion, havn't you? on it's own, the admitting to have cried, is null but considering the other factors such as who tammy is, how she was wagoned, why she was wagoned, who wagoned her, the things that she constantly brags about each game (and is, thus super prideful about) ect are all factors in why it was a town-tell and not a scum-tell. the list could go on forever, and ever, and ever
and then, back to SiAm, I don't think she's town, and I stated that town is giving scum the win, before I had placed a vote anyway. I've pushed her since D1 and her claim that no one was going to go after me, that day is complete bullshit. Regardless of me being the only one to make a case between us, I have been the more viable wagon from the start. People have been suspecting me, and my defenders weren't ever going to go out of their way to defend us.
Nacho? he was barely here, and he had his own problems to deal with.
Mollie? She was to busy tunneling Nacho
SG? She was (and is) lost as all fuck in this game, and she still hasn't come back
and not only have I made a case, she has never responded to it. INSTEAD she uses AtE. Actual AtE while calling us scum, which makes very little sense to do if she actually thinks that I am scum.
as for knowing who she is, and what I expect her to know RE me...
if you can tell me that, when I play you would consider me nice, friendly, non-gambity, non-aggressive, and non-pushy when I have a scum-read on someone, if you can say that when I have a scum-read on someone, I won't pursue it if it's weak then I'll give her a pass for thinking those things as well. She knows me better than you, she's played with me more, and hydra'd with me (but that isn't even what I'm scum-reading her for, anyway)