Newbie 1471: Italian Ice (Game Over!)

ika · Post Post #600 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2014 5:54 am

In post 597, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 485, ika wrote:rob is
more likly to flip town
due to majority scum reading him, that is unless his partner is planing on bussing him and going solo.
it was based off the activity did but was also kinda flawed, frost showed the flaws and how it might not be the case.

In post 490, ika wrote:
im more down for rob atm
if nobody is willing to go with teir atm.
this was more of gut, i jus think im reading too hard into everyones post to the point where in my mind thinks it scummy.

ika · Post Post #601 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2014 5:58 am

In post 596, bjc wrote:Question for ika:

Let's say deadline was in five minutes, and there were two wagons at L-1; one on me and the other on ED.

Who would you choose in those five minutes?

yours becasue it would yeild more info for me, you were stitting at l-1 for quite some time and your flip would be more informative to me.

you may but to be sitting at l-1 for a hefty time frame, scums had a chance to hammer at any point. i would look into who was on your train afterwards if you fliped town. odds would be that one or both scums were on your train, i wouldnt buy an entire town driven train on town in a newbie game

ika · Post Post #602 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2014 5:59 am

In post 599, Sakura Hana wrote:btw ika here's a suggestion, never say things like "If I die during the night look at X" because if you both are town guess who scum is going to kill for a frame job.

semi-joking response: but nacho is? ive seen him do it elsewhere on site and in newbie games

bjc · Post Post #603 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:00 am

So let's lynch ED dammit. Once ED saw I was in no danger of getting hammered he made some big post about how "oh look bjc is null now."

Sakura Hana · Post Post #604 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:01 am

In post 536, ika wrote:yes nobody wants to be lynched.

My fatalistic meta begs to differ

Sorry i just had to comment on that

RayFrost · Post Post #605 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:06 am

It's better to say "look at x regardless of wehtehr I die or live"

ika · Post Post #606 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:06 am

In post 604, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 536, ika wrote:yes nobody wants to be lynched.
My fatalistic meta begs to differ

Sorry i just had to comment on that

well it depends on role you have, if we have a jester (btw on our home site jester is not gmae ending and is commonly a possible role) then you are more inclined to not wanting to be lynched. i know there are scnarios where you do but im kinda refering it to gerneal sense in this one atm

ika · Post Post #607 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:08 am

In post 603, bjc wrote:So let's lynch ED dammit. Once ED saw I was in no danger of getting hammered he made some big post about how "oh look bjc is null now."

VOTE: bjc

l-1

enough of your survivalism play. at this point your play is becoming more hindeirng to me then helpful if your town. you are starting to act like you want to stall your own lynch.

bjc · Post Post #608 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:09 am

......... Okay. Whatever, someone hammer me so I can play in a different newb game.

bjc · Post Post #609 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:13 am

Also, lol at my play hindering you.

bjc · Post Post #610 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:15 am

Answer me this:

How is it stalling my own lynch when I along with others believe ED is scum? I'm not the only one that thinks ED is possible scum.

Sakura Hana · Post Post #611 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:16 am

In post 607, ika wrote:enough of your survivalism play. at this point your play is becoming more hindeirng to me then helpful if your town.

In post 608, bjc wrote:......... Okay. Whatever, someone hammer me so I can play in a different newb game.

^
Does this look like survivalist to you?
And if his play is hindering you then you're effectively pushing for a policy lynch, now that i finished reading im thinking on bjc as more town. Maybe because I've been in his position before.
Also Ika leaning more scum =/

bjc · Post Post #612 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:19 am

I have a hard time believing ika is scum. He seems to kinda ignore ED being a possible lynch cand, so I'd like to look into ika day two.

ED is a great starting point, IMO.

Sakura Hana · Post Post #613 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:20 am

In post 612, bjc wrote:ED is a great starting point, IMO.

I agree with this

Vote: ED

Go counterwagon!

ika · Post Post #614 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:21 am

In post 608, bjc wrote:......... Okay. Whatever, someone hammer me so I can play in a different newb game.

so thats it? your just giving up? thats all i needed to know.

UNVOTE:

VOTE: emerald

reaction passed.

bjc · Post Post #615 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:21 am

BS ika, you're still worth looking into next day. If there's a cop, you should be investigated by them.

bjc · Post Post #616 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:22 am

ED is L-2 IIRC.

ika · Post Post #617 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:24 am

In post 611, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 607, ika wrote:enough of your survivalism play. at this point your play is becoming more hindeirng to me then helpful if your town.

In post 608, bjc wrote:......... Okay. Whatever, someone hammer me so I can play in a different newb game.
^
Does this look like survivalist to you?
And if his play is hindering you then you're effectively pushing for a policy lynch, now that i finished reading im thinking on bjc as more town. Maybe because I've been in his position before.
Also Ika leaning more scum =/

it was a pure test to see his breaking point, he sat at l-1 for a very long time, and he continued to tryt o stall it out and push elsewhere. at first i thought it was flail scum, but his continued fight makes me think hes town. also his last post saying "fuck it lynch me" was all i needed to know to make me think hes town.

i still feel like there was survivalism play in it but it wasnt scum driven survivalism.

bjc · Post Post #618 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:25 am

Never mind the cop comment; if there's a roleblocker we could be headed for some WIFOM regarding a potential blocked investigation.

ika · Post Post #619 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:25 am

In post 615, bjc wrote:BS ika, you're still worth looking into next day. If there's a cop, you should be investigated by them.

i welcome this cop to check me. you seemed to have missed the entire point of my putting you at l-1. i have goten the info i needed

TierShift · Post Post #620 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:28 am

In post 611, Sakura Hana wrote:
In post 607, ika wrote:enough of your survivalism play. at this point your play is becoming more hindeirng to me then helpful if your town.

In post 608, bjc wrote:......... Okay. Whatever, someone hammer me so I can play in a different newb game.
^
Does this look like survivalist to you?
And if his play is hindering you then you're effectively pushing for a policy lynch, now that i finished reading im thinking on bjc as more town. Maybe because I've been in his position before.
Also Ika leaning more scum =/

Don't even try to insinuate 608 is not very very easily fakeable by scum.

That said, bjc doesn't look like it's gonna happen and emerald is, so I'll switch over the next few days if bjc doesn't start picking up votes again.

bjc · Post Post #621 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:29 am

No, put him at L-1 WITH INTENT TO HAMMER

bjc · Post Post #622 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:34 am

How on earth is TS's above post pro town in any way?

ika · Post Post #623 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:36 am

In post 622, bjc wrote:How on earth is TS's above post pro town in any way?

he had most null, tats why i wanted to lynch him so badly. his flip would give most info

Sakura Hana · Post Post #624 (ISO) » Fri Jan 31, 2014 6:40 am

In post 621, bjc wrote:No, put him at L-1 WITH INTENT TO HAMMER

Kinda hard to do both without being a double voter.
intent to hammer is done by a person outside of the wagon when the wagon is at L-1.