looks like incompetent to me. Gonna give it time, though, try to see if I can get a decent read.In post 177, XScorpion wrote:I don't think that the push against cxin is bad (I pretty much agree w/ Thor in 117). Re: 121 - Do you think cxin is competent town? Incompetent town? Scum?
It shows no original reasoning, and paired with your later comment about Thor being conf. town, it shows clear intent to buddy Thor. Then, on top of that, you try to pass the buck on the reasoning in relation to Thor when you are called out on it. By saying "Well, he no longer feels that way.", you were essentially trying to distance yourself from that thought process in relation to its Thor origins. That's scummy as crap.In post 216, T S O wrote:Let's assume this is true for a while.In post 207, Bulbazak wrote:You based your scumread on me off of his reasoning.
What would be wrong with this?
It's moved to probably town due to everyone else's reactions to you.In post 225, Thor665 wrote: I found Bulba putting me at a 'Dunno' read to be townish of him.
There is actually some truth in this statement, but not a fully correct observation as IMO Porkens is asking questions.In post 223, Zekrom25 wrote:you aren't scum hunting, you only post which ones you want goneIn post 222, Porkens wrote:What do you think I should be doing that I'm not?In post 219, Zekrom25 wrote:i feel Porkens is useless
like that ^In post 232, Smudger wrote:How do you ask questions properly?
It's a fluff post that I summarily ignored. How is it you interpret that post as an attempt at duping the player base into believing that's some sort of scum hunting attempt?In post 224, XScorpion wrote:Can you tell me what you think of post 66?
Are you reading the same posts I am? I'm pretty sure Zekrom is operating at a completely different level of game play than the rest of us. I don't see it as fluff.In post 234, Yates wrote:How is it you interpret that post as an attempt at duping the player base into believing that's some sort of scum hunting attempt?
He might have voted first, but I went after him, hard, in my very first post of the game. OMGUS is when you vote a person for no other reason than they voted you. This most definitely isn't that.In post 229, Smudger wrote: @TSO yes let's talk, why did you OMGUS vote Bulba? Yes you disguised it by putting some time between the posts but that is how I see it.
No, this is you twisting words. Again. I said that if you flip scum, Thor is conf. Town. I never called Thor confTown by himself.In post 228, Bulbazak wrote:But if the original reasoning is good enough, then why is it necessary to add onto it?
In post 228, Bulbazak wrote:And paired with your later comment about Thor being conf. town, it shows clear intent to buddy Thor.[/b]
Conversely, as far as I'm concerned, you can hammer right now even without a claim.In post 239, Bulbazak wrote:Zekrom, why aren't you answering my question? How is Thor not helpful?
P-edit: Absolutely not! First, I'd like to see intent given, along with time for claims and final reads, before a hammer falls. Anything else I will PL the next day. There's no reason to claim without intent being given, and you know better Bro. Second, we have 15 days before deadline. There is no need to quickhammer, especially since I think there are several issues we need to resolve before deadline.
But the original reasoning was not good enough. Both Thor and yourself have seen my play as town. Is my arguing over what I take to be a serious point really a scumtell? Heck, Thor has seen me repeatedly ride wagons on myself out as scum. How would I then be freaking out over something insignificant in RVS like he purporting me to be? Essentially, you leaping on for the same cut and dry reasoning without adding why you think that is true based on your own experiences with me, or even why it is likely to be true in this game, is just plain lazy. And I don't associate you with lazy.In post 243, T S O wrote: But if the original reasoning is good enough, then why is it necessary to add onto it?
This is you snipping one sentence from an entire argument and misrepresenting it as an argument in and of itself. I said that the comment paired with you lazily using Thor's argument on me showed an intent to buddy. You can't separate the actions. They have to be seen together as a whole, much like those 3 posts that you churned out shortly after each other. They were meant to work together as a whole.In post 243, T S O wrote:No, this is you twisting words. Again. I said that if you flip scum, Thor is conf. Town. I never called Thor confTown by himself.In post 228, Bulbazak wrote:And paired with your later comment about Thor being conf. town, it shows clear intent to buddy Thor.[/b]