Exactly that?
I don't give a damn what the role evidence says. I'm sticking by that judgment. This feels wrong. Everyone's interactions with him.
In post 2050, Cephrir wrote:So... you were changing your mind, and that one literally completely innocuous post changes your mind back to lolcephisscumfornoreasonimwillingtoexplain?
Yep!
Kaze, sure, but I play SSK so that I can
plausibly
claim vig. My kills still serve a serial killer agenda. I'm killing threats to me. But I'm not going to kill a player that I myself consider obvtown (and generally, not a player the town feels is obvtown even if I feel they aren't), specifically so that I can claim vig with truthful targets if I need to. (Also, as a serial killer, I would be far more prone to taking the stance of leashing serial killers.
)
VOTE: Metal Sonic.
In post 2088, Cephrir wrote:Kaze: SSK can potentially be town because we don't know how pie's role worked.
By the way, you guys are all idiots. Especially those who've played in Gundam, who know EXACTLY how a 1x BP works. And especially ESPECIALLY those who know action resolution. The BP is a passive ability--it activates when pie would die, protecting him from death once, no matter the timing of the attempted kill. The BG an active ability. It allows pie to protect someone from death, but having him be shot in their place. Thus, pie could have been shot at either night OR successfully protected either night. It could be one than the other, or the other and then the one. Pie shot, Pie shot. Pie protect, pie protect. Pie shot, pie protect. Pie protect, pie shot. None of these are any more nor less likely than one another. All are viable, because all are within the boundaries of the role.
In post 2106, macmollie wrote:oh hell no mastina you are always banging on about how leashing the sk is always good for town
*points to nightkills*
Yeaaaaaaah, no. On N1, Varsoon, and either pie or sangres were killed. On N2, Cabd and either pie or pie's target were killed. IF. If the serial killer's kills were plausibly "good". They could be leashed. But None of the N1 kill options are remotely like that. None of the N2 kills (aside from the incredibly-unlikely pie-protected-vigbait) are even remotely like that. The serial killer has made it clear that they're killing town. Intentionally. If they killed town accidentally, sure. Mercy. If they killed scum, sure. Mercy. But they didn't. They aimed for either obvtown players or conftown players. They're scum. Just scum that doesn't have scumbuddies.
If the serial killer changed their tune suddenly tonight, maybe.
Maybe
I'd give mercy. Assuming the change was legitimate, and that they've honestly changed their tune to that alternative rhythm. But if they continue to kill like they have? Or even have the intention of continuing to kill like they have? (Thus the maybe, rather than definitely.) Hell no, they don't get the leash. Because they're not willing to BE leashed. Yes, I advocate leashing serial killers. Yes, I think it good strategy. Yes, I normally would support it. But not THIS serial killer. Because THIS serial killer is clearly of the opinion that they are not to be leashed. We're not dealing with a rabid dog to be tamed. That, I'd support. We're dealing with a wolf, who's
hunting
humans. That, I cannot.
In post 2134, Skullduggery wrote:Which means that you think ActionDan tried to kill Sangres on Night 1, right? Why is ActionDan-Scum more plausible than SSK-Scum in your eyes?
No. In fact, I scumread Kaze for pulling this exact stunt. (And to some extent, Cephrir, too.)
Then who burned up Pieguy's Bulletproof on Night 1? It had to be either SSK or ActionDan. (I'll only entertain the possibility of Ninjas and Strongmen and the like if SSK flips Town.)
Or pie got killed N1. As I said, that's my MO as scum. It could be someone else's MO, here, too. I just don't know whose.
Do you think it's possible that SSK is going out of his way to replicate his Town play to fool you since you seem to be skilled at reading him?
Possible, but not probable. Honestly, the player more likely to be guilty of this is zMuffin.