The Fall of Gondolin Mafia: Game Over (The Tale of Gondolin)
Forum rules
- shos
-
shos Survivor
- shos
- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
In post 346, Tierce wrote:Actually, you know what? That's bullshit, JacobSavage. If I ask you what was the source of a Townread at a certain point and you give me an answer that has nothing to do with the time you posted the read at, it means the original read was made up and you don't have a good reason for it. (Furthermore, it's not like scum don't use meta and you know it, the reason the meta bit was good was because chamber looked for possible non-scum motivation before making accusations.)
UNVOTE: TheIrishPope
VOTE: JacobSavageTierce's Jacob-is-scum scale: +2
In post 345, Tierce wrote:
See post below, which was why the "as of this post" line was here. Try again.In post 343, JacobSavage wrote:
He actually took time to read an old game and posting something quite meaningful.In post 339, Tierce wrote:Jokes are great, but explaining the two Townreads would be even better! Why was chamber Town as of this postTierce's Jacob-is-scum scale: +1 (+3)
In post 347, Tierce wrote:(Plus you called me Possibly a Scummy Scum Butt and that's just Not Acceptable.)Tierce's Jacob-is-scum scale: +.5 (+3.5)
In post 350, Tierce wrote:
I didn't say you closed that possibility, I said (or implied) you were trying to figure out what his style in another game might mean in this game.In post 348, chamber wrote:
ummm... its not like his language had been broken or stilted this game? If anything what I did kept open the possibility of him being scum instead of closing it... which is the opposite (though less extreme) of what you said implied.In post 346, Tierce wrote: (Furthermore, it's not like scum don't use meta and you know it, the reason the meta bit was good was because chamber looked for possible non-scum motivation before making accusations.)
He "forgot"In post 349, TheIrishPope wrote:
mmmmm this doesn't follow. town can't be mistaken about their reasons of having a townread? it's just as likely that he forgotIn post 346, Tierce wrote:Actually, you know what? That's bullshit, JacobSavage. If I ask you what was the source of a Townread at a certain point and you give me an answer that has nothing to do with the time you posted the read at, it means the original read was made up and you don't have a good reason for it. (Furthermore, it's not like scum don't use meta and you know it, the reason the meta bit was good was because chamber looked for possible non-scum motivation before making accusations.)
UNVOTE: TheIrishPope
VOTE: JacobSavagewithin ten hoursof making that list, and within nine hours of saying he has a mild Townread on chamber?
Yeah, I'm not buying that. And I'd prefer it if you'd let him speak for himself before presenting handy excuses.Tierce's Jacob-is-scum scale: +2 (+5.5)
In post 353, Tierce wrote:Nothing, in principle. In practice, you're meddling. Let people speak for themselves before you intervene. I second guess myself enough, I don't need the "help" of others to do so.Tierce's Jacob-is-scum scale: +1 (+6.5)
In post 368, Tierce wrote:siridanilot, for the last fucking time:
Shut
the
hell
up.
YOU have no concept of what a team game is. YOU have no charisma whatsoever, and keep doing the same noisy bullshit you've been doing since the start of the game. You're not actually pushing for consolidation, because every single one of your posts is a torment to read. You're never going to manage to get the players to work together, so be quiet and let the grown ups do their thing. Post when you have somethingnewto say.
Gaaaaah. This isn't the Fall of Gondolin, this is Morgoth's cry over and over and over again.
JacobSavage--let's play spot the difference between chamber and CES's "neighborhood" posts.
Spyspy:
The English-Ur-quan translator failed in these sentences, I suspect. I think I know what you mean in each, but could you just clarify them?In post 351, SpyreX wrote:Now that you made me go back and actually read it I'm not surprised at it bodes well for the future.
However actually trying to engage in something in this morass is a good sign.
Chamber taking the time to go meta as scum at this point looking for a bite under what would have been the strangest pretenses ever is waay more likely town and scum.
PEdit: O hai!
Slow and steady and etc., I know, but humor me and be not-so-cryptic for a little while. Why SSK?
Tierce's Jacob-is-scum scale: +1 (+7.5)
In post 503, Tierce wrote:It's pretty damn obvious that if I thought one of them was scum I would be voting them. Natirasha's Post 464 was Town irritation.
Desperado, you're reachinghardwith the "SSK would only be reading Natirasha if he's Town". I refer to my scumreads' reads as "true" reads all the time to be practical, that doesn't mean anything.
JacobSavage's blatant "memory lapse" in less than half a day is still scummy and there should be more votes on him and CES is wrong.Tierce's Jacob-is-scum scale: +3 (+10.5)
In post 677, Tierce wrote:It was still pointless. The kind of stupid "oh, I'll wing it, I haven't thought that far ahead" reaction test that people so love these days.
Can I get someone interested in this lovely JacobSavage wagon? No? How about with the fact that he's questioning Espeonage about why he chose to do something here that was obviously a premade decision and that has nothing to do with his alignment? He's asking him why he chose to claim VT PRIOR TO THE START OF THE GAME. Oh, I don't know, the answer "because Espeonage is an idiot" might be relevant to his alignment before he even gets a role PM. You can judge someone on WHY they choose to follow the decision they made on an isolated, no-role-PM context, but not on why they made the decision in the first place and it should be obvious why.
Discussing CES Today is a waste of time.
SSK has a far more developed meta assessment of me than I expected. Where've you been hiding? Bring Natirasha over and vote with the cool kids.Tierce's Jacob-is-scum scale: +2 (+12.5)
In post 681, Tierce wrote:
SSK!In post 679, MafiaSSK wrote:
Tierce!In post 677, Tierce wrote:It was still pointless. The kind of stupid "oh, I'll wing it, I haven't thought that far ahead" reaction test that people so love these days.
Can I get someone interested in this lovely JacobSavage wagon? No? How about with the fact that he's questioning Espeonage about why he chose to do something here that was obviously a premade decision and that has nothing to do with his alignment? He's asking him why he chose to claim VT PRIOR TO THE START OF THE GAME. Oh, I don't know, the answer "because Espeonage is an idiot" might be relevant to his alignment before he even gets a role PM. You can judge someone on WHY they choose to follow the decision they made on an isolated, no-role-PM context, but not on why they made the decision in the first place and it should be obvious why.
Discussing CES Today is a waste of time.
SSK has a far more developed meta assessment of me than I expected. Where've you been hiding? Bring Natirasha over and vote with the cool kids.
First off, I've donewaytoo much meta research on you for my own good.
Secondly, I just don't feel as if the JacobSavage wagon is viable today. What do you think of Esp?
Oh, also, why do you think discussing CES today is a waste of time? He at least needs to be discussed.
We can still conjure up a wagon. Less feelings about viability, more votin' him. Let's make it viable in our hour of need.
CES is a tough nut to crack and would only end in a deadline lynch on someone else that is not Mr. Savage because people would be all waffly about Mr. Nibbler's one-liners. Discussing CES would be a distraction and not really help Today's resolution, because THAT lynch is not viable at all (hint: I'm not in it, it ain't happening). Besides, courtesy and what chamber said~ I can't read himwell enough to make a decision on D1, better to accept him as Town until I start reaching for the tinfoil headgear.
Espeonage is an idiot and probably a Town one. Of all the compromise options, it's the least bad one due to the claim, but I'd rather be lynching scum.Tierce's Jacob-is-scum scale: +1 (+13.5)
In post 688, Tierce wrote:I did say a role PM can change your mind on how you act, but inquiring about the initial, rolePMless reasoning is just faking scumhunting. It's something that has no relevance to the game.
I'm pretty sure I've been calling your wagon bad ever since I said that Reck's description of SpyreX made sense for a Town player who didn't realize why SpyreX is acting this way (hint: it's my fault). You're accusing TheIrishPope of being incompetent, not scum.
SpySpy! Good AND perfect lynch right here.Tierce's Jacob-is-scum scale: +1 (+14.5)
In post 749, Tierce wrote:I'm as obvTown as they come and that is a ridiculous vote with such timing as to not even result in proper wagon analysis. Vote Jacob.Tierce's Jacob-is-scum scale: +1 (+15.5)
In post 769, Tierce wrote:Why, TIP? Because I didn't bother to answer your reads question?
How is any of that is relevant right now? I'm voting the wagon that I think is on scum, I pushed it to where it is (hey look, someone who actually has logical skill and the charisma to back it up~), I really have no business haring off with other reads. Some of them are obvious as it is, and if you can't tell them by now, you're not going to get any more enlightenment through a reads list.
I'm being cryptic because I can and because there's really no point in discussing other things right now. Deal with it.
JacobSavage: if sirdanilot's (nonexistent) wagon is the "best of a bad bunch", why do you follow it up with this:
Who is "someone actually scummy" and how do you expect to get them lynched? Where do you want this wagon?In post 764, JacobSavage wrote:Literally the only reason I'd vote ANY of them is to avoid a no lynch and 24 hours is long enough to get a decent wagon on someone actually scummy.Tierce's Jacob-is-scum scale: +1 (+16.5)
In post 774, Tierce wrote:
Uhm, no. I did push the wagon, that's obvious--it was at two people and going nowhere until I did something about it. And if you've actually meta'd me, you know that yes, I am obvTown as Town and hardly have problems saying so, and that I push my suspects and manage to summon up wagons. You're putting it like I'm smothering the game with that stuff, when what I'm doing is trying to push my preferred lynch through (and doing it pretty successfully, apparently!).In post 770, MafiaSSK wrote:You know what, Tierce? I'm just going to say it. You're being pretty anti-town here. You're being selfish. You're claiming the whole JacobSavage wagon is your doing. You keep repeating just how "town" you are. But you're not the lynch for today.
I'll let JacobSavage be the lynch for today. But only because that's the real main wagon and it's deadline. It's a wagon that's based off of false premises by a bad wagon leader.
Vote: JacobSavage
The former is a jab at the Messieurs who keep clamoring for wagons without any real effective attempt at pushing them. Yeah, it's mean. I'm tired of them.Aegor wrote:
Will this continue the entire game? Let me know so I can act accordingly.In post 769, Tierce wrote:How is any of that is relevant right now? I'm voting the wagon that I think is on scum, I pushed it to where it is (hey look, someone who actually has logical skill and the charisma to back it up~), I really have no business haring off with other reads. Some of them are obvious as it is, and if you can't tell them by now, you're not going to get any more enlightenment through a reads list.
I'm being cryptic because I canand because there's really no point in discussing other things right now. Deal with it.
JS wagon is awful, but I want to see where it goes anyway.
VOTE: JacobSavage
Me being cryptic? Nah. But there's really no point to do otherwise at this moment. When my reads are worth sharing more thoroughly, sure.
I keep seeing a lot of people saying JacobSavage is a bad wagon (why?) even as they compromise onto it because it's the main wagon. It being the main wagon is a self-fulfilling prophecy, y'know.Tierce's Jacob-is-scum scale: +1 (+17.5)
In post 780, Tierce wrote:JacobSavage--we need a claim. There be hammer-happy people here, and the clock has run out.Tierce's Jacob-is-scum scale: +0 (+17.5)
Tierce's Jacob-is-scum scale: +0 (+17.5)
In post 799, JacobSavage wrote:I am Glorfindel, Town Bodyguard.
Basically I fought the Balrog but lost but in doing so I saved Idril Celebrindal.Tierce's Jacob-is-scum scale: -25 (-7.5)
Day2:
Tierce's Jacob-is-scum scale: N/A (confirmed town)
Day3:
Tierce's Jacob-is-scum scale: N/A (confirmed town)
Day4:
Tierce's Jacob-is-scum scale: N/A (confirmed town)
In my experience, rarely does one get off the roller coaster at the top of the hill.
Exceptions are confirmations (cop innocent, etc.) of alignment.
I saw no sign of that, and Jacob's alignment was scum.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
In post 1732, shos wrote:ABR is conftown
Scum have a jailkeeper. A stupid one, lol.
Well done ABR; you got lucky; lucky in that your actions didnt hurt town - and with that, they helped town.In post 1937, Tierce wrote:As scum, my priority is Town-looking targets, because they're not lynchable--everyone in a game will likely suspect you at one point or another, so it's pretty stupid to leave a paper trail like that. shos and you would likely have been kill targets for me if I were scum.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- PeregrineV
-
PeregrineV Survivor
- PeregrineV
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 21275
- Joined: February 23, 2011
- Location: Zendikar
I want you to answer that.In post 1947, Desperado wrote:
No one "refuted" your case because there isn't anything to refute, it's just a recitation of the facts. Tierce pushed JS early, forced him to claim along with someone who flipped scum, and then largely ignored him the rest of the game. This is scummy...why?In post 1921, PeregrineV wrote:Everyone has posted and no one has refuted my initial case on Tierce. Then, when I went back to look some more, it only reinforced it. Furthermore, no one has a single better reason for any other player.
What can be gained by getting the Mafia rolecop as a claimed bodyguard on day1?
It's Jacob, so chances are people want to lynch him anyway. A claim fends that off.
He claimed PR. But it's the kind that dies when it succeeds, so another way to fend off the lynch.
Everyone is skeptical, and harasses him about it all game, EXCEPT Tierce, who pushed him all the way up to the claim.
Tell me why this behavior is NOT scummy?
Did he fuck up his night actions? He claimed Bodyguard and flipped mafia rolecop. Explain the realtionship between his claim and his actual night actions.In post 1947, Desperado wrote: He was a claimed BG in a large game, which is exactly the kind of thing that resolves itself and isn't worth wasting time on and, lo and behold, he fucked up his night actions! Imagine that.
OK, give me your rational recitation of the facts where sirdanilot is scum. Because this would actually be the first time I've gotten anything like that from you.In post 1947, Desperado wrote:And Ihavepresented better reasons for sirdan, I've just been consistently stonewalled by an endless string of shitty pseudo-town clears for him, the latest being your "you think sirdanscum saw JSscum drowning and forced him to claim while still distancing? Impossible!" track.I will haveLimited Accesson weekends.- ActionDan
-
ActionDan Jack of All Trades
- ActionDan
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6536
- Joined: November 15, 2011
- Location: Inside the Trojan Horse
- shos
-
shos Survivor
- shos
- sirdanilot
-
sirdanilot Mafia Scum
- sirdanilot
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2657
- Joined: October 5, 2006
- Location: The Netherlands
Desp's case is so bullshitty I see no reason to respond to it.
ActionDan may be scum, based on what the others said about him. I kinda like his play so I didnt really want to look at him (I know, very bad of me, sue me) but maybe I cannot ignore him any longer. Still voting either tierce or esp today though.- Desperado
-
Desperado Survivor
- Desperado
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 12582
- Joined: February 18, 2013
- Location: Raleigh, NC
Because it's exactly what I would expect Tierce to do as town as well. Jacob claiming BG sorted him and Tierce moved on to more important things.In post 1953, PeregrineV wrote:I want you to answer that.
What can be gained by getting the Mafia rolecop as a claimed bodyguard on day1?
It's Jacob, so chances are people want to lynch him anyway. A claim fends that off.
He claimed PR. But it's the kind that dies when it succeeds, so another way to fend off the lynch.
Everyone is skeptical, and harasses him about it all game, EXCEPT Tierce, who pushed him all the way up to the claim.
Tell me why this behavior is NOT scummy?
First he claimed to have BG'd "the obvious target" on N2 and N3, and then later he said he did ABR N2 and AD N3. It played a large part in pushing his wagon.In post 1953, PeregrineV wrote:Did he fuck up his night actions? He claimed Bodyguard and flipped mafia rolecop. Explain the realtionship between his claim and his actual night actions.
I'm pretty sure it'd be the first time you've ever gotten anything like that from me in any game ever.In post 1953, PeregrineV wrote:OK, give me your rational recitation of the facts where sirdanilot is scum. Because this would actually be the first time I've gotten anything like that from you.- Tierce
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Tierce
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
- Plum
-
Plum
- Espeonage
-
Espeonage Survivor
- Espeonage
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11586
- Joined: December 17, 2009
- Location: Galar Maybe?
- Tierce
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Tierce
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
You said it yourself--JacobSavage claimed to protect ActionDan when he had just said that he had done the "obvious choice"--whatever the obvious choice was, it was not Action "One-Liner" Dan. shos was talking about his result--and any member of a scumteam would already know that JacobSavage didn't target ABR N2 if shos is Town. So tell me why Peregrine scum wouldn't immediately toss his hat in the ring for a bus when the lynch is inevitable?In post 1943, SpyreX wrote:Tierce you're drivin me nuts this game.
AD - scum means JS tossed him out in his nonsense night action claims which I have a hard time buying assuming rationality but..JS so maybe.ActionDan, PeregrineV, profit
But then PV is the one who insta-votes him for it?
One man down, another on the block and two others (more likely than not the entire rest of the scumteam) throw themselves out in a way that isn't gonna stop that lynch or even really make them look better for it?
I have a hard time choking that down.
Oh my, I'm shaking.In post 1945, sirdanilot wrote:If tierce doesn't answer why he didn't see that Shadoweh was scum at the point I described then I'm not changing my vote
Dahling, you've been praising my play far too well, I don't want that to end, so do go on doing what you are. If Shadoweh was so obvious scum, care to explain why ActionDan, who knows her better than I do, didn't spot it and essentially asked her to convince him to vote for you on D2? Either he's scum, or it wasn't obvious, and there was no wagon on her so it certainly wasn't my opinion alone that kept her unlynched before D3. Your bitching about it is still not my problem.
Elscouta: I guess? You'd probably be better served looking through my MD posts. This is a position I hold, though it doesn't necessarily correspond to the kills I make as scum because y'know, partners. IIRC, that was one of reasons I argued for Nacho's death in The Red Wedding. Point being: your reasoning is wrong because I don't support "people suspectme, let's kill them" as scum, so that kill pattern isn't mine.
If PeregrineV is Town and can't see the advantage of focusing on people who haven't claimed a protective role on D1, I don't know what else to say. He's saying that as scum, I drove my Rolecop buddy to claim Bodyguard on D1, knowing all kinds of roles that could catch him in a lie, from any sort of tracking abilities to investigative ones, in aPlumgame of all things? He claimed Bodyguard, I believed him, I moved the fuck on.
Do you want an actual recap of D1?In post 644, Plum wrote:
They were starting to push a TIP wagon. TIP was Town. Espeonage was being wagoned. Regardless of Espeonage's alignment, why on Earth would Tierce-scum derail a nice double-wagon on people who are not her Rolecop buddy to push said scum Rolecop? If Espeonage is scum and I was scum looking for a bus, his wagon was ripe and awesome and effortless. If Espeonage is Town and I was scum, I would have declined two Town wagons to push a scum PR in a likely power-heavy game and force him into a terrible claim that was bound to screw him over. It'd be a high-risk, low-profit move. As sirdanilot so eloquently put it, I am a goddess at this game and goddesses of practicality don't make errors of judgment like that.In post 677, Tierce wrote:Can I get someone interested in this lovely JacobSavage wagon? No? How about with the fact that he's questioning Espeonage about why he chose to do something here that was obviously a premade decision and that has nothing to do with his alignment? He's asking him why he chose to claim VT PRIOR TO THE START OF THE GAME. Oh, I don't know, the answer "because Espeonage is an idiot" might be relevant to his alignment before he even gets a role PM. You can judge someone on WHY they choose to follow the decision they made on an isolated, no-role-PM context, but not on why they made the decision in the first place and it should be obvious why.
I'm Town. I bought the claim, and saying that "everyone doubted JacobSavage's claim EXCEPT Tierce" is pretty obviously not what happened given how D2 and D3 played out.
But do continue to argue about me dropping a push on a player whose claim I accepted as probably-true-and-not-my-problem-anyway. How many people on that D1 wagon are you going to lynch because they didn't go after Jacob before late D3?
This should be real good.
---
Desperado: I don't think Shadoweh was bussing at the end of D2. It's much easier to see the interaction between her and ActionDan at that point as scum theater (including the whole "why isn't sirdanilot around to protest his lynch at 4:30 am!" between them) than her jump on the wagon at my behest (oooh, fancy vocabulary, it's evidence of all my Amazon goddess powers) on her scumbuddy, when we know she could easily pretend to be asleep instead of bussing.
And I'mbrilliantat this game, so you should vote with me and wait until sirdanilot inevitably fucks this up in LyLo.- sirdanilot
-
sirdanilot Mafia Scum
- sirdanilot
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2657
- Joined: October 5, 2006
- Location: The Netherlands
- Tierce
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Tierce
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
- sirdanilot
-
sirdanilot Mafia Scum
- sirdanilot
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2657
- Joined: October 5, 2006
- Location: The Netherlands
I am talking about day 3, not day 2. If you reread the events on day 2 the only obvious conclusion was that Shadoweh was scum.In post 1961, Tierce wrote:
Oh my, I'm shaking.In post 1945, sirdanilot wrote:If tierce doesn't answer why he didn't see that Shadoweh was scum at the point I described then I'm not changing my vote
Dahling, you've been praising my play far too well, I don't want that to end, so do go on doing what you are. If Shadoweh was so obvious scum, care to explain why ActionDan, who knows her better than I do, didn't spot it and essentially asked her to convince him to vote for you on D2? Either he's scum, or it wasn't obvious, and there was no wagon on her so it certainly wasn't my opinion alone that kept her unlynched before D3. Your bitching about it is still not my problem.
Why did you not see that immediately?
Still not changin my vote, and you're getting awful close to a lynch, so why not just answer?
Elscouta: I guess? You'd probably be better served looking through my MD posts. This is a position I hold, though it doesn't necessarily correspond to the kills I make as scum because y'know, partners. IIRC, that was one of reasons I argued for Nacho's death in The Red Wedding. Point being: your reasoning is wrong because I don't support "people suspectme, let's kill them" as scum, so that kill pattern isn't mine.
If PeregrineV is Town and can't see the advantage of focusing on people who haven't claimed a protective role on D1, I don't know what else to say. He's saying that as scum, I drove my Rolecop buddy to claim Bodyguard on D1, knowing all kinds of roles that could catch him in a lie, from any sort of tracking abilities to investigative ones, in aPlumgame of all things? He claimed Bodyguard, I believed him, I moved the fuck on.
Do you want an actual recap of D1?In post 644, Plum wrote:
They were starting to push a TIP wagon. TIP was Town. Espeonage was being wagoned. Regardless of Espeonage's alignment, why on Earth would Tierce-scum derail a nice double-wagon on people who are not her Rolecop buddy to push said scum Rolecop? If Espeonage is scum and I was scum looking for a bus, his wagon was ripe and awesome and effortless. If Espeonage is Town and I was scum, I would have declined two Town wagons to push a scum PR in a likely power-heavy game and force him into a terrible claim that was bound to screw him over. It'd be a high-risk, low-profit move. As sirdanilot so eloquently put it, I am a goddess at this game and goddesses of practicality don't make errors of judgment like that.In post 677, Tierce wrote:Can I get someone interested in this lovely JacobSavage wagon? No? How about with the fact that he's questioning Espeonage about why he chose to do something here that was obviously a premade decision and that has nothing to do with his alignment? He's asking him why he chose to claim VT PRIOR TO THE START OF THE GAME. Oh, I don't know, the answer "because Espeonage is an idiot" might be relevant to his alignment before he even gets a role PM. You can judge someone on WHY they choose to follow the decision they made on an isolated, no-role-PM context, but not on why they made the decision in the first place and it should be obvious why.
I'm Town. I bought the claim, and saying that "everyone doubted JacobSavage's claim EXCEPT Tierce" is pretty obviously not what happened given how D2 and D3 played out.
But do continue to argue about me dropping a push on a player whose claim I accepted as probably-true-and-not-my-problem-anyway. How many people on that D1 wagon are you going to lynch because they didn't go after Jacob before late D3?
This should be real good.
---
Desperado: I don't think Shadoweh was bussing at the end of D2. It's much easier to see the interaction between her and ActionDan at that point as scum theater (including the whole "why isn't sirdanilot around to protest his lynch at 4:30 am!" between them) than her jump on the wagon at my behest (oooh, fancy vocabulary, it's evidence of all my Amazon goddess powers) on her scumbuddy, when we know she could easily pretend to be asleep instead of bussing.
And I'mbrilliantat this game, so you should vote with me and wait until sirdanilot inevitably fucks this up in LyLo.[/quote]- sirdanilot
-
sirdanilot Mafia Scum
- sirdanilot
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2657
- Joined: October 5, 2006
- Location: The Netherlands
- Tierce
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Tierce
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
Because it was not the "only obvious conclusion". Her behavior around the D2 deadline looked Town.In post 1964, sirdanilot wrote:I am talking about day 3, not day 2. If you reread the events on day 2 the only obvious conclusion was that Shadoweh was scum.
Why did you not see that immediately?
Still not changin my vote, and you're getting awful close to a lynch, so why not just answer?
Difficult to get that from my posts, I know, must be the whole GOD(DESS) TALK that you're not able to decipher.
D3 started. I voted my main suspect, then went back and looked at Natirasha and Majiffy's posts. I should have used my goddess powers to travel back in time and discover the crumb before Plum even posted Majiffy's flip. Will do so next time, thanks for the notice! ^_^
While we are at it, because I am a kind and benevolent goddess of femininity, let's go and look at your D2 posts leading into D3:In post 1157, sirdanilot wrote:Majiffy's Shadoweh case actually looks good, though I always read him town until now, so not sheeping.
Still Townreading Shadoweh, and in the next post you say that CES is the most "scumread" of the list, so it's not like you're going after Shadoweh.In post 1220, sirdanilot wrote:4. The town's core, even though not all of these are necessarily town, they are the only ones that keep some amount of movement in the game
Majiffy, Shadoweh, sirdanilot, Tierce, Cogito Ergo Sum (also 3)
Fine with that Shadoweh Townread still.In post 1246, sirdanilot wrote:I prefer Jiffy's reads to AD's reads, or at least the abr/ces part.
AD aren't you scum?
Still Townreading Shadoweh.In post 1289, sirdanilot wrote:
This is horrible, especially the medium/null kinds of reads. I can understand your shos and Shadoweh reads. Your TIP read in principle I do not disagree with but your reasons are crap and pulled from a fresh backside ('condescending' as a scumtell? Really?). Your MafiaSSK read points to him being your buddy if MafiaSSK flips scum and vice versa.In post 1285, Elscouta wrote:MafiaSSK - no read / nothing particularly stroke out one way or another, but i didn't look particularly in this direction
Shadoweh - medium town read. Originally strong town read due to the general tone of her posts. Some doubt now due to Majiffy case (that i didn't digest fully, but that makes kinda sense) and the fact that she seems to hang out with bad people / on bad wagons
TIP - slight scum read. Mostly i find him useless and very condescending. Useless is neutral read, but condescending / discrediting cases is something a bit more scummy in my book
sho - very strong town read. Common suspicions, some posts that sounded very townie (most recent being #1275).
You don't mention her again until D3, where you vote her after I reveal Majiffy's crumb. So tell me again how Shadoweh was so obvious scum that I should have time-traveled to be able to spot it before I went through Majiffy's ISO on D3?- Tierce
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Tierce
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
And now if you'll excuse me, I'd rather go back to scumhunting instead of admiring your Renaissance painting of my glorious image.
Goodgoddessme I'm rereading the game why
As much as I get all kinds of bad flashbacks about dragons when trying to read Desperado, the fact that he dropped his vote on Natirasha-Town on D1, later called Majiffy Town, and this specific pair of posts--In post 1176, Desperado wrote:
Does he do that often as scum? We just finished a perfect scum win together and he was significantly more interested in the game than he appears to be right now.In post 1175, PeregrineV wrote:But, ABR is running at 100% below minimal.
--rings pretty Town. When he later voted ABR, he didn't use PeregrineV or sirdanilot's stances to justify it; it seemed a pretty fluid change of read, which makes these two posts genuine inquiry instead of trying to edge in a vote.In post 1178, Desperado wrote:
I wasn't speaking generally, I was talking about Albert specifically. My experience with his scum game is that he cares very much about what is going on and is extremely involved. Have you played with him before?In post 1177, sirdanilot wrote:^ I don't think being interested in the game or not is a scum tell, though being interested does help your faction.- Tierce
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Tierce
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
EBWOP:
How the Ages fly when you're fighting for your life and throwing people down the mountainside.In post 1961, Tierce wrote:given how D2 and D3and D4played out.
But do continue to argue about me dropping a push on a player whose claim I accepted as probably-true-and-not-my-problem-anyway. How many people on that D1 wagon are you going to lynch because they didn't go after Jacob before late D4?- ActionDan
-
ActionDan Jack of All Trades
- ActionDan
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6536
- Joined: November 15, 2011
- Location: Inside the Trojan Horse
- Tierce
-
Tierce Cache Me If You Can
- Tierce
- Cache Me If You Can
- Cache Me If You Can
- Posts: 9964
- Joined: November 8, 2011
- Location: Las Vegas, NV
...
Are my posts invisible? Bolded for your skimming convenience:
He's scum. Pls bus.In post 1961, Tierce wrote:
You said it yourself--JacobSavage claimed to protect ActionDan when he had just said that he had done the "obvious choice"--whatever the obvious choice was, it was not Action "One-Liner" Dan. shos was talking about his result--and any member of a scumteam would already know that JacobSavage didn't target ABR N2 if shos is Town.In post 1943, SpyreX wrote:Tierce you're drivin me nuts this game.
AD - scum means JS tossed him out in his nonsense night action claims which I have a hard time buying assuming rationality but..JS so maybe.ActionDan, PeregrineV, profit
But then PV is the one who insta-votes him for it?
One man down, another on the block and two others (more likely than not the entire rest of the scumteam) throw themselves out in a way that isn't gonna stop that lynch or even really make them look better for it?
I have a hard time choking that down.So tell me why Peregrine scum wouldn't immediately toss his hat in the ring for a bus when the lynch is inevitable?
[...]
If PeregrineV is Town and can't see the advantage of focusing on people who haven't claimed a protective role on D1, I don't know what else to say.He's saying that as scum, I drove my Rolecop buddy to claim Bodyguard on D1, knowing all kinds of roles that could catch him in a lie, from any sort of tracking abilities to investigative ones, in aPlumgame of all things? He claimed Bodyguard, I believed him, I moved the fuck on.
Do you want an actual recap of D1?In post 644, Plum wrote:
They were starting to push a TIP wagon. TIP was Town. Espeonage was being wagoned. Regardless of Espeonage's alignment, why on Earth would Tierce-scum derail a nice double-wagon on people who are not her Rolecop buddy to push said scum Rolecop? If Espeonage is scum and I was scum looking for a bus, his wagon was ripe and awesome and effortless. If Espeonage is Town and I was scum, I would have declined two Town wagons to push a scum PR in a likely power-heavy game and force him into a terrible claim that was bound to screw him over. It'd be a high-risk, low-profit move. As sirdanilot so eloquently put it, I am a goddess at this game and goddesses of practicality don't make errors of judgment like that.In post 677, Tierce wrote:Can I get someone interested in this lovely JacobSavage wagon? No? How about with the fact that he's questioning Espeonage about why he chose to do something here that was obviously a premade decision and that has nothing to do with his alignment? He's asking him why he chose to claim VT PRIOR TO THE START OF THE GAME. Oh, I don't know, the answer "because Espeonage is an idiot" might be relevant to his alignment before he even gets a role PM. You can judge someone on WHY they choose to follow the decision they made on an isolated, no-role-PM context, but not on why they made the decision in the first place and it should be obvious why.
I'm Town. I bought the claim, and saying that "everyone doubted JacobSavage's claim EXCEPT Tierce" ispretty obviously not what happened given how D2 and D3 played out.
But do continue to argue about me dropping a push on a player whose claim I accepted as probably-true-and-not-my-problem-anyway. How many people on that D1 wagon are you going to lynch because they didn't go after Jacob before late D4?- ActionDan
-
ActionDan Jack of All Trades
- ActionDan
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6536
- Joined: November 15, 2011
- Location: Inside the Trojan Horse
- shos
-
shos Survivor
- shos
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
VOTE: sirdan
That is a product of poe.
Mostly townreads,peoplei want to keep alive, and well tierces poats yhis page are overwhelming for scum.
Ill admit i have yet to win as town against tierce, though. Dat gurl touches me deep.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose. - shos
- ActionDan
- Tierce
- ActionDan
- Tierce
- Tierce
- Tierce
- sirdanilot
- sirdanilot
- Tierce
- sirdanilot
- Tierce
- Espeonage
- Tierce
- Desperado
- sirdanilot
- ActionDan
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV
- PeregrineV